致 "成人维持性血液透析患者虚弱风险预测模型 "的信:系统回顾和方法评估

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Xue Chen, Dianpu Zhang
{"title":"致 \"成人维持性血液透析患者虚弱风险预测模型 \"的信:系统回顾和方法评估","authors":"Xue Chen, Dianpu Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jan.16998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with great interest the recent article ‘Risk Prediction Models for Frailty in Adult Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Methodological Appraisal’ by Zhang et al. (<span>2025</span>), an important contribution to the field of predictive modelling in nephrology. The authors adeptly summarised methodological challenges and highlighted the critical gaps in the development and validation of frailty prediction models. However, through a deeper reflection, we would like to revisit and expand upon certain aspects of their findings, particularly regarding the methodological rigour, clinical utility, and future directions for research and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letter to ‘Risk Prediction Models for Frailty in Adult Maintenance Haemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Methodological Appraisal’\",\"authors\":\"Xue Chen, Dianpu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We read with great interest the recent article ‘Risk Prediction Models for Frailty in Adult Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Methodological Appraisal’ by Zhang et al. (<span>2025</span>), an important contribution to the field of predictive modelling in nephrology. The authors adeptly summarised methodological challenges and highlighted the critical gaps in the development and validation of frailty prediction models. However, through a deeper reflection, we would like to revisit and expand upon certain aspects of their findings, particularly regarding the methodological rigour, clinical utility, and future directions for research and implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16998\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了 Zhang 等人最近发表的文章《成人维持性血液透析患者虚弱的风险预测模型:Zhang 等人(2025 年)撰写的文章《成人维持性血液透析患者的虚弱风险预测模型:系统回顾与方法评估》对肾脏病学的预测建模领域做出了重要贡献。作者巧妙地总结了方法学方面的挑战,并强调了在开发和验证虚弱预测模型方面存在的关键差距。然而,通过更深入的思考,我们希望重新审视并扩展他们研究结果的某些方面,尤其是方法的严谨性、临床实用性以及未来的研究和实施方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Letter to ‘Risk Prediction Models for Frailty in Adult Maintenance Haemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Methodological Appraisal’

We read with great interest the recent article ‘Risk Prediction Models for Frailty in Adult Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Methodological Appraisal’ by Zhang et al. (2025), an important contribution to the field of predictive modelling in nephrology. The authors adeptly summarised methodological challenges and highlighted the critical gaps in the development and validation of frailty prediction models. However, through a deeper reflection, we would like to revisit and expand upon certain aspects of their findings, particularly regarding the methodological rigour, clinical utility, and future directions for research and implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信