重新考虑液滴撞击固体表面的最大变形问题

Droplet Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1002/dro2.163
Zhifeng Hu, Haojiang Ran, He Shan, Fuqiang Chu, Zuankai Wang, Ruzhu Wang
{"title":"重新考虑液滴撞击固体表面的最大变形问题","authors":"Zhifeng Hu,&nbsp;Haojiang Ran,&nbsp;He Shan,&nbsp;Fuqiang Chu,&nbsp;Zuankai Wang,&nbsp;Ruzhu Wang","doi":"10.1002/dro2.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Droplet impact on solid surfaces is widely involved in diverse applications such as spray cooling, self-cleaning, and hydrovoltaic technology. Maximum solid‒liquid contact area yielded by droplet spreading is one key parameter determining energy conversion between droplets and surfaces. However, for the maximum deformation of impact droplets, the contact length and droplet width are usually mixed indiscriminately, resulting in unignored prediction errors in the maximum contact area. Herein, we investigate and highlight the difference between the maximum contact length and maximum droplet width. The maximum droplet width is never smaller than the maximum contact length, and the difference appears once the contact angle exceeds 90° (which becomes more significant on superhydrophobic surfaces), regardless of impact velocities, liquid viscosities, and system scales (from macroscale to nanoscale). A theoretical model analyzing the structure of the spreading rim is proposed to demonstrate and quantitatively predict the above difference, agreeing well with experimental results. Based on molecular dynamics simulations, the theoretical analysis is further extended to the scenario of nanodroplets impacting on solid surfaces. Reconsideration on the maximum deformation of impact droplets underscores the often-overlooked yet significant difference between maximum values of contact length and droplet width, which is crucial for applications involving droplet‒interface interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":100381,"journal":{"name":"Droplet","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dro2.163","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconsideration on the maximum deformation of droplets impacting on solid surfaces\",\"authors\":\"Zhifeng Hu,&nbsp;Haojiang Ran,&nbsp;He Shan,&nbsp;Fuqiang Chu,&nbsp;Zuankai Wang,&nbsp;Ruzhu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dro2.163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Droplet impact on solid surfaces is widely involved in diverse applications such as spray cooling, self-cleaning, and hydrovoltaic technology. Maximum solid‒liquid contact area yielded by droplet spreading is one key parameter determining energy conversion between droplets and surfaces. However, for the maximum deformation of impact droplets, the contact length and droplet width are usually mixed indiscriminately, resulting in unignored prediction errors in the maximum contact area. Herein, we investigate and highlight the difference between the maximum contact length and maximum droplet width. The maximum droplet width is never smaller than the maximum contact length, and the difference appears once the contact angle exceeds 90° (which becomes more significant on superhydrophobic surfaces), regardless of impact velocities, liquid viscosities, and system scales (from macroscale to nanoscale). A theoretical model analyzing the structure of the spreading rim is proposed to demonstrate and quantitatively predict the above difference, agreeing well with experimental results. Based on molecular dynamics simulations, the theoretical analysis is further extended to the scenario of nanodroplets impacting on solid surfaces. Reconsideration on the maximum deformation of impact droplets underscores the often-overlooked yet significant difference between maximum values of contact length and droplet width, which is crucial for applications involving droplet‒interface interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Droplet\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dro2.163\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Droplet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dro2.163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Droplet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dro2.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

液滴对固体表面的冲击广泛涉及各种应用,如喷雾冷却、自清洁和水力发电技术。液滴扩散产生的最大固液接触面积是决定液滴与表面能量转换的关键参数之一。然而,对于冲击液滴的最大变形,通常将接触长度和液滴宽度混在一起,导致最大接触面积的预测误差不可忽视。在此,我们研究并强调了最大接触长度和最大液滴宽度之间的差异。无论撞击速度、液体粘度和系统尺度(从宏观尺度到纳米尺度)如何,最大液滴宽度永远不会小于最大接触长度,一旦接触角超过90°(在超疏水表面上变得更加明显),差异就会出现。提出了一种理论模型,分析了扩轮缘的结构,对上述差异进行了论证和定量预测,与实验结果吻合较好。在分子动力学模拟的基础上,进一步将理论分析扩展到纳米液滴撞击固体表面的场景。重新考虑撞击液滴的最大变形强调了接触长度最大值和液滴宽度之间经常被忽视但重要的差异,这对于涉及液滴界面相互作用的应用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reconsideration on the maximum deformation of droplets impacting on solid surfaces

Reconsideration on the maximum deformation of droplets impacting on solid surfaces

Droplet impact on solid surfaces is widely involved in diverse applications such as spray cooling, self-cleaning, and hydrovoltaic technology. Maximum solid‒liquid contact area yielded by droplet spreading is one key parameter determining energy conversion between droplets and surfaces. However, for the maximum deformation of impact droplets, the contact length and droplet width are usually mixed indiscriminately, resulting in unignored prediction errors in the maximum contact area. Herein, we investigate and highlight the difference between the maximum contact length and maximum droplet width. The maximum droplet width is never smaller than the maximum contact length, and the difference appears once the contact angle exceeds 90° (which becomes more significant on superhydrophobic surfaces), regardless of impact velocities, liquid viscosities, and system scales (from macroscale to nanoscale). A theoretical model analyzing the structure of the spreading rim is proposed to demonstrate and quantitatively predict the above difference, agreeing well with experimental results. Based on molecular dynamics simulations, the theoretical analysis is further extended to the scenario of nanodroplets impacting on solid surfaces. Reconsideration on the maximum deformation of impact droplets underscores the often-overlooked yet significant difference between maximum values of contact length and droplet width, which is crucial for applications involving droplet‒interface interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信