MathFlowLens仪表板:共同设计教师编排工具,以参与围绕学生数学策略的话语

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tamisha Thompson, Jennifer St. John, Siddhartha Pradhan, Erin Ottmar
{"title":"MathFlowLens仪表板:共同设计教师编排工具,以参与围绕学生数学策略的话语","authors":"Tamisha Thompson,&nbsp;Jennifer St. John,&nbsp;Siddhartha Pradhan,&nbsp;Erin Ottmar","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Educational technologies typically provide teachers with analytics regarding student proficiency, but few digital tools provide teachers with process-based information about students' variable problem-solving strategies as they solve problems. Utilising design thinking and co-designing with teachers can provide insight to researchers about what educators need to make instructional decisions based on student problem-solving data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This case study presents a collaboration where researchers and teachers co-designed MathFlowLens, a teacher-facing dashboard that provides analytics and visualisations about students' diverse problem-solving strategies and behaviours used when solving online math problems in the classroom.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Over several sessions, teachers discussed, mocked up, and were provided with behavioural data and strategy visualisations from students' math problem-solving that demonstrated the variability of strategic approaches. Throughout this process, the team documented, transcribed, and used these conversations and artefacts to inform the design and development of the teacher tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Teachers discussed and designed prototypes of data dashboards and provided the research team with ongoing feedback to inform the iteration of the tool development.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MathFlowLens Dashboard: Co-Designing Teacher Orchestration Tools to Engage in Discourse Around Students' Mathematical Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Tamisha Thompson,&nbsp;Jennifer St. John,&nbsp;Siddhartha Pradhan,&nbsp;Erin Ottmar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcal.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Educational technologies typically provide teachers with analytics regarding student proficiency, but few digital tools provide teachers with process-based information about students' variable problem-solving strategies as they solve problems. Utilising design thinking and co-designing with teachers can provide insight to researchers about what educators need to make instructional decisions based on student problem-solving data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This case study presents a collaboration where researchers and teachers co-designed MathFlowLens, a teacher-facing dashboard that provides analytics and visualisations about students' diverse problem-solving strategies and behaviours used when solving online math problems in the classroom.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Over several sessions, teachers discussed, mocked up, and were provided with behavioural data and strategy visualisations from students' math problem-solving that demonstrated the variability of strategic approaches. Throughout this process, the team documented, transcribed, and used these conversations and artefacts to inform the design and development of the teacher tool.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Teachers discussed and designed prototypes of data dashboards and provided the research team with ongoing feedback to inform the iteration of the tool development.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育技术通常为教师提供有关学生熟练程度的分析,但很少有数字工具为教师提供有关学生在解决问题时各种解决问题策略的基于过程的信息。利用设计思维和与教师共同设计可以为研究人员提供洞察力,了解教育工作者需要根据学生解决问题的数据做出哪些教学决策。本案例研究展示了一项合作,研究人员和教师共同设计了MathFlowLens,这是一个面向教师的仪表板,可以分析和可视化学生在课堂上解决在线数学问题时使用的各种解决问题的策略和行为。方法在几次会议中,教师们讨论、模拟并提供了学生解决数学问题的行为数据和策略可视化,这些数据和策略可视化展示了策略方法的可变性。在整个过程中,团队记录、转录并使用这些对话和工件来通知教师工具的设计和开发。教师们讨论并设计了数据仪表板的原型,并为研究团队提供了持续的反馈,以告知工具开发的迭代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MathFlowLens Dashboard: Co-Designing Teacher Orchestration Tools to Engage in Discourse Around Students' Mathematical Strategies

Background

Educational technologies typically provide teachers with analytics regarding student proficiency, but few digital tools provide teachers with process-based information about students' variable problem-solving strategies as they solve problems. Utilising design thinking and co-designing with teachers can provide insight to researchers about what educators need to make instructional decisions based on student problem-solving data.

Objectives

This case study presents a collaboration where researchers and teachers co-designed MathFlowLens, a teacher-facing dashboard that provides analytics and visualisations about students' diverse problem-solving strategies and behaviours used when solving online math problems in the classroom.

Methods

Over several sessions, teachers discussed, mocked up, and were provided with behavioural data and strategy visualisations from students' math problem-solving that demonstrated the variability of strategic approaches. Throughout this process, the team documented, transcribed, and used these conversations and artefacts to inform the design and development of the teacher tool.

Results and Conclusions

Teachers discussed and designed prototypes of data dashboards and provided the research team with ongoing feedback to inform the iteration of the tool development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信