Anna Yan Zhang, Gloria Hoi Yan Wong, Terry Yat Sang Lum, Bob Woods, Aimee Spector
{"title":"痴呆患者认知刺激治疗组的建设性参与：一项混合方法研究","authors":"Anna Yan Zhang, Gloria Hoi Yan Wong, Terry Yat Sang Lum, Bob Woods, Aimee Spector","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical guidelines recommend personalized activities and group cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for promoting cognition, independence, and well-being in persons with dementia. Constructive engagement (CE), the state of being occupied positively in purposeful activities, is theoretically an essential process in personalized activities and CST. However, whether CE develops over time and what contributes to it are unknown. We investigated changes in CE during CST and its contributors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a mixed-methods study. We used time sampling to record the time proportion of persons with dementia (<i>n</i> = 113) spent in constructive, passive, non–task-related engagement and non-engagement during early, middle, and late phases in a 14-session group CST. We tested changes in time proportion between phases using repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA). We analyzed qualitative interviews of CST facilitators (<i>n</i> = 12) thematically to explore contributors to CE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Persons with dementia spent 51% and 46% of their time in constructive and passive engagement, respectively. Time of engagement in non–task-related activities and non-engagement was minimal. CE remained stable at around 50% of activity time throughout the intervention course, except for a slight increase from the early to middle phase (48% to 55%, F (2224) = 3.779, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Age (<i>r </i>= −0.26, <i>p</i> < 0.01), cognitive function (<i>r </i>= −0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and activities of daily living (<i>r </i>= 0.20, <i>p</i> < 0.05) at baseline were significantly correlated with CE, but gender and education were not. Contributors to CE include (1) tailoring activities, (2) using group dynamics, and (3) promoting positive experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussions</h3>\n \n <p>Group CST engages persons with dementia well, regardless of their differences in gender and literacy levels. CE remained relatively stable during CST, and younger, more physically and cognitively able people showed slightly greater CE. In group-based interventions, facilitators' skills and techniques could enhance CE. Future studies may focus on how CE as a plausible change mechanism further improves the intervention outcomes of persons with dementia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is a non-pharmacological intervention that involves group-based activities and exercises to improve cognition and quality of life for persons with dementia, but the specific mechanisms behind it are not yet fully understood.</li>\n \n <li>This study is the first to investigate constructive engagement (CE), which describes active involvement in meaningful activities or complex interventions, specifically CST, for persons with dementia.</li>\n \n <li>CST engages them well, regardless of gender and literacy differences. CE time increases at the early intervention phase and stabilizes later on. CE occupies around half of the intervention time throughout CST, which can still be further increased by activity design and facilitators' skills.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructive engagement in cognitive stimulation therapy groups among people with dementia: A mixed-methods study\",\"authors\":\"Anna Yan Zhang, Gloria Hoi Yan Wong, Terry Yat Sang Lum, Bob Woods, Aimee Spector\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/trc2.70075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical guidelines recommend personalized activities and group cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for promoting cognition, independence, and well-being in persons with dementia. Constructive engagement (CE), the state of being occupied positively in purposeful activities, is theoretically an essential process in personalized activities and CST. However, whether CE develops over time and what contributes to it are unknown. We investigated changes in CE during CST and its contributors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a mixed-methods study. We used time sampling to record the time proportion of persons with dementia (<i>n</i> = 113) spent in constructive, passive, non–task-related engagement and non-engagement during early, middle, and late phases in a 14-session group CST. We tested changes in time proportion between phases using repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA). We analyzed qualitative interviews of CST facilitators (<i>n</i> = 12) thematically to explore contributors to CE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Persons with dementia spent 51% and 46% of their time in constructive and passive engagement, respectively. Time of engagement in non–task-related activities and non-engagement was minimal. CE remained stable at around 50% of activity time throughout the intervention course, except for a slight increase from the early to middle phase (48% to 55%, F (2224) = 3.779, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Age (<i>r </i>= −0.26, <i>p</i> < 0.01), cognitive function (<i>r </i>= −0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and activities of daily living (<i>r </i>= 0.20, <i>p</i> < 0.05) at baseline were significantly correlated with CE, but gender and education were not. Contributors to CE include (1) tailoring activities, (2) using group dynamics, and (3) promoting positive experiences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Group CST engages persons with dementia well, regardless of their differences in gender and literacy levels. CE remained relatively stable during CST, and younger, more physically and cognitively able people showed slightly greater CE. In group-based interventions, facilitators' skills and techniques could enhance CE. Future studies may focus on how CE as a plausible change mechanism further improves the intervention outcomes of persons with dementia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is a non-pharmacological intervention that involves group-based activities and exercises to improve cognition and quality of life for persons with dementia, but the specific mechanisms behind it are not yet fully understood.</li>\\n \\n <li>This study is the first to investigate constructive engagement (CE), which describes active involvement in meaningful activities or complex interventions, specifically CST, for persons with dementia.</li>\\n \\n <li>CST engages them well, regardless of gender and literacy differences. CE time increases at the early intervention phase and stabilizes later on. CE occupies around half of the intervention time throughout CST, which can still be further increased by activity design and facilitators' skills.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70075\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constructive engagement in cognitive stimulation therapy groups among people with dementia: A mixed-methods study
Introduction
Clinical guidelines recommend personalized activities and group cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for promoting cognition, independence, and well-being in persons with dementia. Constructive engagement (CE), the state of being occupied positively in purposeful activities, is theoretically an essential process in personalized activities and CST. However, whether CE develops over time and what contributes to it are unknown. We investigated changes in CE during CST and its contributors.
Methods
This is a mixed-methods study. We used time sampling to record the time proportion of persons with dementia (n = 113) spent in constructive, passive, non–task-related engagement and non-engagement during early, middle, and late phases in a 14-session group CST. We tested changes in time proportion between phases using repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA). We analyzed qualitative interviews of CST facilitators (n = 12) thematically to explore contributors to CE.
Results
Persons with dementia spent 51% and 46% of their time in constructive and passive engagement, respectively. Time of engagement in non–task-related activities and non-engagement was minimal. CE remained stable at around 50% of activity time throughout the intervention course, except for a slight increase from the early to middle phase (48% to 55%, F (2224) = 3.779, p < 0.05). Age (r = −0.26, p < 0.01), cognitive function (r = −0.29, p < 0.01), and activities of daily living (r = 0.20, p < 0.05) at baseline were significantly correlated with CE, but gender and education were not. Contributors to CE include (1) tailoring activities, (2) using group dynamics, and (3) promoting positive experiences.
Discussions
Group CST engages persons with dementia well, regardless of their differences in gender and literacy levels. CE remained relatively stable during CST, and younger, more physically and cognitively able people showed slightly greater CE. In group-based interventions, facilitators' skills and techniques could enhance CE. Future studies may focus on how CE as a plausible change mechanism further improves the intervention outcomes of persons with dementia.
Highlights
Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is a non-pharmacological intervention that involves group-based activities and exercises to improve cognition and quality of life for persons with dementia, but the specific mechanisms behind it are not yet fully understood.
This study is the first to investigate constructive engagement (CE), which describes active involvement in meaningful activities or complex interventions, specifically CST, for persons with dementia.
CST engages them well, regardless of gender and literacy differences. CE time increases at the early intervention phase and stabilizes later on. CE occupies around half of the intervention time throughout CST, which can still be further increased by activity design and facilitators' skills.
期刊介绍：
Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
