乙状窦后入路减少前庭神经鞘瘤手术脑脊液漏:回顾性临床研究

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Louise Deboeuf, Michel Kalamarides, Olivier Sterkers, Bruno Law-Ye, Ghizlène Lahlou, Daniele Bernardeschi, Lauranne Alciato
{"title":"乙状窦后入路减少前庭神经鞘瘤手术脑脊液漏:回顾性临床研究","authors":"Louise Deboeuf,&nbsp;Michel Kalamarides,&nbsp;Olivier Sterkers,&nbsp;Bruno Law-Ye,&nbsp;Ghizlène Lahlou,&nbsp;Daniele Bernardeschi,&nbsp;Lauranne Alciato","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06519-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Cerebrospinal fluid leak can occur after retrosigmoid craniectomy and lead to substantial patient morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare two closure techniques for vestibular schwannoma resection in terms of cerebrospinal fluid leak and other procedure-related issues.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective monocentric study included patients who underwent surgery for vestibular schwannoma resection via a retrosigmoid approach by the same oto-neurosurgical team. Before 2019, the retrosigmoid approach consisted of a craniectomy and the closure involved autologous abdominal fat graft obliteration (previous procedure). After 2019, the authors performed a craniotomy and used S53P4 bioactive glass granules to close the craniotomy site (new procedure).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 193 patients, 79 with the previous procedure and 114 the new procedure. Cerebrospinal fluid leak developed postoperatively in 3 patients with the new procedure and 14 with the previous procedure (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Need for surgical revision to treat the leak was lower with the new than previous procedure (1 vs 6 patients, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and the median length of hospital stay was reduced by 2 days with the new procedure (&lt; 0.001).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The craniotomy/bioactive glass obliteration technique was associated with less cerebrospinal fluid leak as compared with craniectomy/autologous fat graft obliteration, less revision surgery and a shorter hospital stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06519-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing cerebrospinal fluid leak in vestibular schwannoma surgery via a retrosigmoid approach: a retrospective clinical study\",\"authors\":\"Louise Deboeuf,&nbsp;Michel Kalamarides,&nbsp;Olivier Sterkers,&nbsp;Bruno Law-Ye,&nbsp;Ghizlène Lahlou,&nbsp;Daniele Bernardeschi,&nbsp;Lauranne Alciato\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00701-025-06519-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Cerebrospinal fluid leak can occur after retrosigmoid craniectomy and lead to substantial patient morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare two closure techniques for vestibular schwannoma resection in terms of cerebrospinal fluid leak and other procedure-related issues.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective monocentric study included patients who underwent surgery for vestibular schwannoma resection via a retrosigmoid approach by the same oto-neurosurgical team. Before 2019, the retrosigmoid approach consisted of a craniectomy and the closure involved autologous abdominal fat graft obliteration (previous procedure). After 2019, the authors performed a craniotomy and used S53P4 bioactive glass granules to close the craniotomy site (new procedure).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 193 patients, 79 with the previous procedure and 114 the new procedure. Cerebrospinal fluid leak developed postoperatively in 3 patients with the new procedure and 14 with the previous procedure (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Need for surgical revision to treat the leak was lower with the new than previous procedure (1 vs 6 patients, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and the median length of hospital stay was reduced by 2 days with the new procedure (&lt; 0.001).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The craniotomy/bioactive glass obliteration technique was associated with less cerebrospinal fluid leak as compared with craniectomy/autologous fat graft obliteration, less revision surgery and a shorter hospital stay.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06519-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06519-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06519-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的乙状结肠后颅骨切除术后可发生脑脊液漏,导致患者大量发病。本研究的目的是比较两种前庭神经鞘瘤切除术中脑脊液泄漏和其他手术相关问题的闭合技术。方法本回顾性单中心研究纳入了同一耳神经外科团队经乙状窦后入路行前庭神经鞘瘤切除术的患者。在2019年之前,乙状结肠后入路包括颅骨切除术,闭合包括自体腹部脂肪移植闭塞(以前的手术)。2019年后,作者进行了开颅手术,并使用S53P4生物活性玻璃颗粒封闭开颅部位(新手术)。结果共纳入193例患者,79例既往手术,114例新手术。新手术组3例术后发生脑脊液漏,旧手术组14例(p <;0.01)。与以前的手术相比,新手术的手术翻修治疗泄漏的需要更低(1例对6例,p = 0.02),新手术的住院时间中位数减少了2天(<;0.001)。结论开颅术/生物活性玻璃闭塞术与开颅术/自体脂肪闭塞术相比,脑脊液漏少,翻修手术少,住院时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing cerebrospinal fluid leak in vestibular schwannoma surgery via a retrosigmoid approach: a retrospective clinical study

Objective

Cerebrospinal fluid leak can occur after retrosigmoid craniectomy and lead to substantial patient morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare two closure techniques for vestibular schwannoma resection in terms of cerebrospinal fluid leak and other procedure-related issues.

Methods

This retrospective monocentric study included patients who underwent surgery for vestibular schwannoma resection via a retrosigmoid approach by the same oto-neurosurgical team. Before 2019, the retrosigmoid approach consisted of a craniectomy and the closure involved autologous abdominal fat graft obliteration (previous procedure). After 2019, the authors performed a craniotomy and used S53P4 bioactive glass granules to close the craniotomy site (new procedure).

Results

We included 193 patients, 79 with the previous procedure and 114 the new procedure. Cerebrospinal fluid leak developed postoperatively in 3 patients with the new procedure and 14 with the previous procedure (p < 0.01). Need for surgical revision to treat the leak was lower with the new than previous procedure (1 vs 6 patients, p = 0.02) and the median length of hospital stay was reduced by 2 days with the new procedure (< 0.001).

Conclusion

The craniotomy/bioactive glass obliteration technique was associated with less cerebrospinal fluid leak as compared with craniectomy/autologous fat graft obliteration, less revision surgery and a shorter hospital stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信