超声诊断巨细胞动脉炎内膜-中膜厚度的准确性:系统回顾

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Camila Pitasi , Fernando Lamarca , Veronica Vilela , Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos , Markus Aschwanden , Stephan Imfeld , Daniel Staub , Thomas Daikeler
{"title":"超声诊断巨细胞动脉炎内膜-中膜厚度的准确性:系统回顾","authors":"Camila Pitasi ,&nbsp;Fernando Lamarca ,&nbsp;Veronica Vilela ,&nbsp;Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos ,&nbsp;Markus Aschwanden ,&nbsp;Stephan Imfeld ,&nbsp;Daniel Staub ,&nbsp;Thomas Daikeler","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of quantitative intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement by ultrasound (US) for diagnosing GCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review of the following electronic databases was performed: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, and Google Scholar (no date and language restriction, last search June 3, 2024). Studies that tested IMT`s diagnostic accuracy as a primary outcome in GCA suspected patients were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 2786 records screened by title and abstracts, 7 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The proposed IMT cut-off values for vasculitis in between the studies varied between 0.4 and 0.44, and 0.81 and 1.2 mm for the temporal (TA) and the axillary artery (Axa), respectively. Most cut-off values were post hoc calculated. Diagnostic accuracy vis-à-vis qualitative judgement of the respective segments by US or MRI was high (sensitivities: 76 to 100 %, specificities: 85.7 to 100 %) despite the different cut-offs used. All studies have a high risk of bias in at least two QUADAS-2 domains due to patient selection issues, lack of US blinding, and use of the index test as part of the reference standard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The seven studies had considerable drawbacks due to biases across several domains. This might explain the high reported diagnostic accuracy for defining vasculitis of the TA and Axa segments, despite different cut-off values and reference standards being used in these studies. Reliable IMT cut-off values of the TA and the Axa for diagnosing GCA are not yet available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 152725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of the intima-media thickness by ultrasound for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Camila Pitasi ,&nbsp;Fernando Lamarca ,&nbsp;Veronica Vilela ,&nbsp;Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos ,&nbsp;Markus Aschwanden ,&nbsp;Stephan Imfeld ,&nbsp;Daniel Staub ,&nbsp;Thomas Daikeler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of quantitative intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement by ultrasound (US) for diagnosing GCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review of the following electronic databases was performed: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, and Google Scholar (no date and language restriction, last search June 3, 2024). Studies that tested IMT`s diagnostic accuracy as a primary outcome in GCA suspected patients were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 2786 records screened by title and abstracts, 7 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The proposed IMT cut-off values for vasculitis in between the studies varied between 0.4 and 0.44, and 0.81 and 1.2 mm for the temporal (TA) and the axillary artery (Axa), respectively. Most cut-off values were post hoc calculated. Diagnostic accuracy vis-à-vis qualitative judgement of the respective segments by US or MRI was high (sensitivities: 76 to 100 %, specificities: 85.7 to 100 %) despite the different cut-offs used. All studies have a high risk of bias in at least two QUADAS-2 domains due to patient selection issues, lack of US blinding, and use of the index test as part of the reference standard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The seven studies had considerable drawbacks due to biases across several domains. This might explain the high reported diagnostic accuracy for defining vasculitis of the TA and Axa segments, despite different cut-off values and reference standards being used in these studies. Reliable IMT cut-off values of the TA and the Axa for diagnosing GCA are not yet available.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152725\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225000964\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225000964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨超声定量测量血管内膜-中膜厚度(IMT)对GCA的诊断价值。方法系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、Lilacs、谷歌Scholar等电子数据库(无日期和语言限制,最后检索日期为2024年6月3日)。将IMT诊断准确性作为疑似GCA患者的主要预后指标的研究纳入其中。使用QUADAS-2工具评估研究的质量。结果经标题和摘要筛选的2786篇文献中,有7篇符合纳入标准。在这两项研究中,血管炎的IMT截止值分别在0.4和0.44之间,颞动脉(TA)和腋窝动脉(Axa)的IMT截止值分别在0.81和1.2 mm之间。大多数临界值是事后计算的。尽管使用了不同的截止值,但通过US或MRI对各自节段进行定性判断的诊断准确性-à-vis很高(敏感性:76%至100%,特异性:85.7%至100%)。由于患者选择问题,缺乏美国盲法,以及使用指数检验作为参考标准的一部分,所有研究在至少两个QUADAS-2领域存在高偏倚风险。结论由于在多个领域存在偏倚,这7项研究存在相当大的缺陷。这可能解释了尽管在这些研究中使用了不同的临界值和参考标准,但在定义TA和Axa节段血管炎时报道的高诊断准确性。目前还没有可靠的TA和Axa诊断GCA的IMT截止值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Accuracy of the intima-media thickness by ultrasound for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review

Accuracy of the intima-media thickness by ultrasound for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review

Objectives

To evaluate the performance of quantitative intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement by ultrasound (US) for diagnosing GCA.

Methods

A systematic literature review of the following electronic databases was performed: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, and Google Scholar (no date and language restriction, last search June 3, 2024). Studies that tested IMT`s diagnostic accuracy as a primary outcome in GCA suspected patients were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results

Among 2786 records screened by title and abstracts, 7 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The proposed IMT cut-off values for vasculitis in between the studies varied between 0.4 and 0.44, and 0.81 and 1.2 mm for the temporal (TA) and the axillary artery (Axa), respectively. Most cut-off values were post hoc calculated. Diagnostic accuracy vis-à-vis qualitative judgement of the respective segments by US or MRI was high (sensitivities: 76 to 100 %, specificities: 85.7 to 100 %) despite the different cut-offs used. All studies have a high risk of bias in at least two QUADAS-2 domains due to patient selection issues, lack of US blinding, and use of the index test as part of the reference standard.

Conclusion

The seven studies had considerable drawbacks due to biases across several domains. This might explain the high reported diagnostic accuracy for defining vasculitis of the TA and Axa segments, despite different cut-off values and reference standards being used in these studies. Reliable IMT cut-off values of the TA and the Axa for diagnosing GCA are not yet available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信