Christian Schwöppe, Caroline Brand, Kathrin Hessling, Heike Hintelmann, Andrew F. Berdel, Georg Lenz, Torsten Kessler, Manfred Fobker, Christoph Schliemann, Wolfgang E. Berdel
{"title":"824:单独静脉应用或与前文trabectedin联合应用时靶向组织因子tTF-NGR的比较药代动力学(PK)","authors":"Christian Schwöppe, Caroline Brand, Kathrin Hessling, Heike Hintelmann, Andrew F. Berdel, Georg Lenz, Torsten Kessler, Manfred Fobker, Christoph Schliemann, Wolfgang E. Berdel","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trabectedin is a treatment option for relapsed/refractory soft tissue sarcomas (STS). CD13 is a neutral aminopeptidase expressed on invasive endothelial cells (EC) such as in the tumor vasculature. CD13-targeted tissue factor (tTF-NGR) is a recombinant pro-coagulatory fusion protein with a molecular weight of 30381.98 g/mol which accumulates in the tumor vasculature leading to tumor vascular occlusion and tumor infarction. Giving both compounds in sequence could trap trabectedin inside tumors and increase its efficacy. Vice versa trabectedin optimizes activity of tTF-NGR by externalizing phosphatidylserine (PS) on the surface of EC. PK of safety patients treated at our hospital within a multicenter trial of a combination of trabectedin and tTF-NGR in advanced STS patients refractory to 1st line systemic therapy (TRABTRAP, EudraCT 2020-005858-21) were compared with PK from our phase I monotherapy study with tTF-NGR (EudraCT 2016-003042-85). We compared standard PK parameters for tTF-NGR at identical dose levels (1.0 to 3.0 mg/m2) from TRABTRAP and phase I within the same laboratory with identical methods and calculations. Although some PK differences between phase I and TRABTRAP were more pronounced at lower dose levels, global values such as Cmax, AUC, t1/2alpha, t1/2term, and Kel indicated an increased AUC with a delayed elimination of tTF-NGR when given after trabectedin. As tTF-NGR was always given daily, we measured the remaining tTF-NGR concentrations before subsequent applications and found significantly increased values in the combination protocol (1 mg/m2: p<0.0001; 3 mg/m2: p<0.0002) when compared with the phase I values, suggesting a possible accumulation of tTF-NGR which we did not observe with monotherapy. A specific way of tTF-NGR elimination in the vascular system is the internalization of the tTF-NGR:CD13 complex into EC. Using flow cytometry and fluorescence labeling with tTF-NGR and EC in vitro, expression of CD13 on EC was slightly diminished by trabectedin exposure. Also, tTF-NGR binding to CD13 (p<0.01) and internalization (p=0.01) decreased when tested on control and trabectedin-exposed EC. Both lead to more tTF-NGR molecules remaining in the circulation, explaining part of the delayed elimination. Further, we compared functionality of tTF-NGR in the plasma of patients from phase I and TRABTRAP. On the basis of equal protein amounts and without influence of confounders such as storage, the ability of factor VIIa:tTF-NGR:CD13 to activate factor X to Xa was higher when trabectedin was given to the patients before. Among possible explanations are the decreased liver protease levels after trabectedin, which could influence the functionality of tTF-NGR. In summary, these results explain why the Maximum Tolerated Dose level for tTF-NGR established in the TRABTRAP safety cohort is lower than the 3 mg/m2 in the phase I study. Citation Format: Christian Schwöppe, Caroline Brand, Kathrin Hessling, Heike Hintelmann, Andrew F. Berdel, Georg Lenz, Torsten Kessler, Manfred Fobker, Christoph Schliemann, Wolfgang E. Berdel. Comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) of targeted tissue factor tTF-NGR when intravenously applied alone or in combination with preceding trabectedin [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular s); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1): nr 824.","PeriodicalId":9441,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract 824: Comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) of targeted tissue factor tTF-NGR when intravenously applied alone or in combination with preceding trabectedin\",\"authors\":\"Christian Schwöppe, Caroline Brand, Kathrin Hessling, Heike Hintelmann, Andrew F. Berdel, Georg Lenz, Torsten Kessler, Manfred Fobker, Christoph Schliemann, Wolfgang E. Berdel\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trabectedin is a treatment option for relapsed/refractory soft tissue sarcomas (STS). CD13 is a neutral aminopeptidase expressed on invasive endothelial cells (EC) such as in the tumor vasculature. CD13-targeted tissue factor (tTF-NGR) is a recombinant pro-coagulatory fusion protein with a molecular weight of 30381.98 g/mol which accumulates in the tumor vasculature leading to tumor vascular occlusion and tumor infarction. Giving both compounds in sequence could trap trabectedin inside tumors and increase its efficacy. Vice versa trabectedin optimizes activity of tTF-NGR by externalizing phosphatidylserine (PS) on the surface of EC. PK of safety patients treated at our hospital within a multicenter trial of a combination of trabectedin and tTF-NGR in advanced STS patients refractory to 1st line systemic therapy (TRABTRAP, EudraCT 2020-005858-21) were compared with PK from our phase I monotherapy study with tTF-NGR (EudraCT 2016-003042-85). We compared standard PK parameters for tTF-NGR at identical dose levels (1.0 to 3.0 mg/m2) from TRABTRAP and phase I within the same laboratory with identical methods and calculations. Although some PK differences between phase I and TRABTRAP were more pronounced at lower dose levels, global values such as Cmax, AUC, t1/2alpha, t1/2term, and Kel indicated an increased AUC with a delayed elimination of tTF-NGR when given after trabectedin. As tTF-NGR was always given daily, we measured the remaining tTF-NGR concentrations before subsequent applications and found significantly increased values in the combination protocol (1 mg/m2: p<0.0001; 3 mg/m2: p<0.0002) when compared with the phase I values, suggesting a possible accumulation of tTF-NGR which we did not observe with monotherapy. A specific way of tTF-NGR elimination in the vascular system is the internalization of the tTF-NGR:CD13 complex into EC. Using flow cytometry and fluorescence labeling with tTF-NGR and EC in vitro, expression of CD13 on EC was slightly diminished by trabectedin exposure. Also, tTF-NGR binding to CD13 (p<0.01) and internalization (p=0.01) decreased when tested on control and trabectedin-exposed EC. Both lead to more tTF-NGR molecules remaining in the circulation, explaining part of the delayed elimination. Further, we compared functionality of tTF-NGR in the plasma of patients from phase I and TRABTRAP. On the basis of equal protein amounts and without influence of confounders such as storage, the ability of factor VIIa:tTF-NGR:CD13 to activate factor X to Xa was higher when trabectedin was given to the patients before. Among possible explanations are the decreased liver protease levels after trabectedin, which could influence the functionality of tTF-NGR. In summary, these results explain why the Maximum Tolerated Dose level for tTF-NGR established in the TRABTRAP safety cohort is lower than the 3 mg/m2 in the phase I study. Citation Format: Christian Schwöppe, Caroline Brand, Kathrin Hessling, Heike Hintelmann, Andrew F. Berdel, Georg Lenz, Torsten Kessler, Manfred Fobker, Christoph Schliemann, Wolfgang E. Berdel. Comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) of targeted tissue factor tTF-NGR when intravenously applied alone or in combination with preceding trabectedin [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular s); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1): nr 824.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-824\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Trabectedin是复发/难治性软组织肉瘤(STS)的治疗选择。CD13是一种在侵袭性内皮细胞(EC)如肿瘤血管中表达的中性氨基肽酶。cd13靶向组织因子(tTF-NGR)是一种分子量为30381.98 g/mol的重组促凝融合蛋白,在肿瘤血管中积累,导致肿瘤血管闭塞和肿瘤梗死。按顺序给予这两种化合物可以将trabectedin困在肿瘤内并提高其疗效。反之,trabectedin通过外化EC表面的磷脂酰丝氨酸(PS)来优化tTF-NGR的活性。在我们医院的一项多中心试验中,trabectedin和tTF-NGR联合治疗一线全身治疗难治性晚期STS患者(TRABTRAP, EudraCT 2020-005858-21)的安全性患者的PK与我们的tTF-NGR一期单药治疗研究(EudraCT 2016-003042-85)的PK进行了比较。我们用相同的方法和计算方法比较了TRABTRAP和第一阶段在相同剂量水平(1.0至3.0 mg/m2)下tTF-NGR的标准PK参数。尽管在较低剂量水平下,一期和TRABTRAP之间的一些PK差异更为明显,但总体值(如Cmax、AUC、t1/2alpha、t1/2term和Kel)表明,在trabectedin给药后,AUC增加,tTF-NGR消除延迟。由于tTF-NGR总是每天给药,我们在后续应用前测量了剩余的tTF-NGR浓度,发现在联合方案中值显着增加(1 mg/m2: p<0.0001;3 mg/m2: p<0.0002),与I期值相比,表明tTF-NGR可能积累,这是我们在单药治疗中没有观察到的。tTF-NGR在血管系统中消除的一种具体方式是tTF-NGR:CD13复合物内化到EC中。流式细胞术和体外tTF-NGR和EC荧光标记显示,暴露于trabectedin后,EC上CD13的表达略有降低。此外,tTF-NGR与CD13的结合(p<0.01)和内化(p=0.01)在对照和trabectedin暴露的EC中测试时下降。两者都导致更多的tTF-NGR分子留在循环中,这部分解释了延迟消除的原因。此外,我们比较了I期和TRABTRAP患者血浆中tTF-NGR的功能。在蛋白量相等的基础上,不受储存等混杂因素的影响,患者在给予trabectedin之前,因子VIIa:tTF-NGR:CD13激活因子X到Xa的能力更高。一个可能的解释是,trabectedin后肝脏蛋白酶水平下降,这可能影响tTF-NGR的功能。总之,这些结果解释了为什么TRABTRAP安全性队列中tTF-NGR的最大耐受剂量水平低于I期研究中的3mg /m2。引文格式:Christian Schwöppe, Caroline Brand, Kathrin Hessling, Heike Hintelmann, Andrew F. Berdel, Georg Lenz, Torsten Kessler, Manfred Fobker, Christoph Schliemann, Wolfgang E. Berdel。靶向组织因子tTF-NGR单独静脉应用或与前文trabectedin联合应用时的比较药代动力学(PK)[摘要]。摘自:《2025年美国癌症研究协会年会论文集》;第1部分(常规);2025年4月25日至30日;费城(PA): AACR;中国癌症杂志,2015;31(8):391 - 391。
Abstract 824: Comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) of targeted tissue factor tTF-NGR when intravenously applied alone or in combination with preceding trabectedin
Trabectedin is a treatment option for relapsed/refractory soft tissue sarcomas (STS). CD13 is a neutral aminopeptidase expressed on invasive endothelial cells (EC) such as in the tumor vasculature. CD13-targeted tissue factor (tTF-NGR) is a recombinant pro-coagulatory fusion protein with a molecular weight of 30381.98 g/mol which accumulates in the tumor vasculature leading to tumor vascular occlusion and tumor infarction. Giving both compounds in sequence could trap trabectedin inside tumors and increase its efficacy. Vice versa trabectedin optimizes activity of tTF-NGR by externalizing phosphatidylserine (PS) on the surface of EC. PK of safety patients treated at our hospital within a multicenter trial of a combination of trabectedin and tTF-NGR in advanced STS patients refractory to 1st line systemic therapy (TRABTRAP, EudraCT 2020-005858-21) were compared with PK from our phase I monotherapy study with tTF-NGR (EudraCT 2016-003042-85). We compared standard PK parameters for tTF-NGR at identical dose levels (1.0 to 3.0 mg/m2) from TRABTRAP and phase I within the same laboratory with identical methods and calculations. Although some PK differences between phase I and TRABTRAP were more pronounced at lower dose levels, global values such as Cmax, AUC, t1/2alpha, t1/2term, and Kel indicated an increased AUC with a delayed elimination of tTF-NGR when given after trabectedin. As tTF-NGR was always given daily, we measured the remaining tTF-NGR concentrations before subsequent applications and found significantly increased values in the combination protocol (1 mg/m2: p<0.0001; 3 mg/m2: p<0.0002) when compared with the phase I values, suggesting a possible accumulation of tTF-NGR which we did not observe with monotherapy. A specific way of tTF-NGR elimination in the vascular system is the internalization of the tTF-NGR:CD13 complex into EC. Using flow cytometry and fluorescence labeling with tTF-NGR and EC in vitro, expression of CD13 on EC was slightly diminished by trabectedin exposure. Also, tTF-NGR binding to CD13 (p<0.01) and internalization (p=0.01) decreased when tested on control and trabectedin-exposed EC. Both lead to more tTF-NGR molecules remaining in the circulation, explaining part of the delayed elimination. Further, we compared functionality of tTF-NGR in the plasma of patients from phase I and TRABTRAP. On the basis of equal protein amounts and without influence of confounders such as storage, the ability of factor VIIa:tTF-NGR:CD13 to activate factor X to Xa was higher when trabectedin was given to the patients before. Among possible explanations are the decreased liver protease levels after trabectedin, which could influence the functionality of tTF-NGR. In summary, these results explain why the Maximum Tolerated Dose level for tTF-NGR established in the TRABTRAP safety cohort is lower than the 3 mg/m2 in the phase I study. Citation Format: Christian Schwöppe, Caroline Brand, Kathrin Hessling, Heike Hintelmann, Andrew F. Berdel, Georg Lenz, Torsten Kessler, Manfred Fobker, Christoph Schliemann, Wolfgang E. Berdel. Comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) of targeted tissue factor tTF-NGR when intravenously applied alone or in combination with preceding trabectedin [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular s); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1): nr 824.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Research, published by the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), is a journal that focuses on impactful original studies, reviews, and opinion pieces relevant to the broad cancer research community. Manuscripts that present conceptual or technological advances leading to insights into cancer biology are particularly sought after. The journal also places emphasis on convergence science, which involves bridging multiple distinct areas of cancer research.
With primary subsections including Cancer Biology, Cancer Immunology, Cancer Metabolism and Molecular Mechanisms, Translational Cancer Biology, Cancer Landscapes, and Convergence Science, Cancer Research has a comprehensive scope. It is published twice a month and has one volume per year, with a print ISSN of 0008-5472 and an online ISSN of 1538-7445.
Cancer Research is abstracted and/or indexed in various databases and platforms, including BIOSIS Previews (R) Database, MEDLINE, Current Contents/Life Sciences, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Web of Science.