埃及含有再生混凝土骨料的沥青混合料的比较生命周期评估

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
D. El-Tahan, A. Gabr, S. Dessouky, S. El-Badawy
{"title":"埃及含有再生混凝土骨料的沥青混合料的比较生命周期评估","authors":"D. El-Tahan,&nbsp;A. Gabr,&nbsp;S. Dessouky,&nbsp;S. El-Badawy","doi":"10.1007/s10163-025-02191-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) for hot mix asphalt (HMA) and warm mix asphalts (WMAs) manufactured using two different technologies. The investigated asphalt mixtures were prepared with recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) as a replacement for coarse natural aggregates (NAs). The OpenLCA version 1.10.3 software was utilized for modeling the processes analyzed in this study and the life cycle inputs/outputs associated with the functional unit characterized during the life cycle impact assessment phase using the TRACI v.2.1 method. The production cost analysis was then applied to compare the investigated asphalt mixtures. The results showed that the impact of the processes associated with the production of RCA is the best for all the analyzed impact categories than NA. For the asphalt mixture production, the environmental impact of WMA with Sasobit as an organic additive was lower than HMA by 5–10%, while WMA with Asphamin as a synthetic zeolite additive increased the environmental impact values by 4–43%. In terms of production cost, the HMA showed the lowest cost compared to WMA. In addition, the use of RCA as a substitution to NA yielded a slight decrease of up to 4% in the total production of the asphalt mixtures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 3","pages":"1462 - 1477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative life cycle assessment of asphalt mixtures containing recycled concrete aggregate in Egypt\",\"authors\":\"D. El-Tahan,&nbsp;A. Gabr,&nbsp;S. Dessouky,&nbsp;S. El-Badawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-025-02191-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) for hot mix asphalt (HMA) and warm mix asphalts (WMAs) manufactured using two different technologies. The investigated asphalt mixtures were prepared with recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) as a replacement for coarse natural aggregates (NAs). The OpenLCA version 1.10.3 software was utilized for modeling the processes analyzed in this study and the life cycle inputs/outputs associated with the functional unit characterized during the life cycle impact assessment phase using the TRACI v.2.1 method. The production cost analysis was then applied to compare the investigated asphalt mixtures. The results showed that the impact of the processes associated with the production of RCA is the best for all the analyzed impact categories than NA. For the asphalt mixture production, the environmental impact of WMA with Sasobit as an organic additive was lower than HMA by 5–10%, while WMA with Asphamin as a synthetic zeolite additive increased the environmental impact values by 4–43%. In terms of production cost, the HMA showed the lowest cost compared to WMA. In addition, the use of RCA as a substitution to NA yielded a slight decrease of up to 4% in the total production of the asphalt mixtures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"1462 - 1477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02191-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02191-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了热拌沥青(HMA)和温拌沥青(wma)的综合生命周期评估(LCA)。所研究的沥青混合料是用再生混凝土骨料(RCAs)作为粗天然骨料(NAs)的替代品制备的。使用OpenLCA 1.10.3版本软件对本研究分析的过程进行建模,并使用TRACI v.2.1方法对生命周期影响评估阶段表征的功能单元相关的生命周期输入/输出进行建模。然后应用生产成本分析对所研究的沥青混合料进行了比较。结果表明,在所有分析的影响类别中,与RCA生产相关的工艺的影响都比NA好。对于沥青混合料的生产,以Sasobit为有机添加剂的WMA的环境影响值比HMA低5-10%,而以Asphamin为合成沸石添加剂的WMA的环境影响值提高了4-43%。在生产成本方面,与WMA相比,HMA的成本最低。此外,使用RCA作为NA的替代品,在沥青混合物的总产量中略有下降,最高可达4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative life cycle assessment of asphalt mixtures containing recycled concrete aggregate in Egypt

This paper presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) for hot mix asphalt (HMA) and warm mix asphalts (WMAs) manufactured using two different technologies. The investigated asphalt mixtures were prepared with recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) as a replacement for coarse natural aggregates (NAs). The OpenLCA version 1.10.3 software was utilized for modeling the processes analyzed in this study and the life cycle inputs/outputs associated with the functional unit characterized during the life cycle impact assessment phase using the TRACI v.2.1 method. The production cost analysis was then applied to compare the investigated asphalt mixtures. The results showed that the impact of the processes associated with the production of RCA is the best for all the analyzed impact categories than NA. For the asphalt mixture production, the environmental impact of WMA with Sasobit as an organic additive was lower than HMA by 5–10%, while WMA with Asphamin as a synthetic zeolite additive increased the environmental impact values by 4–43%. In terms of production cost, the HMA showed the lowest cost compared to WMA. In addition, the use of RCA as a substitution to NA yielded a slight decrease of up to 4% in the total production of the asphalt mixtures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信