{"title":"埃及含有再生混凝土骨料的沥青混合料的比较生命周期评估","authors":"D. El-Tahan, A. Gabr, S. Dessouky, S. El-Badawy","doi":"10.1007/s10163-025-02191-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) for hot mix asphalt (HMA) and warm mix asphalts (WMAs) manufactured using two different technologies. The investigated asphalt mixtures were prepared with recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) as a replacement for coarse natural aggregates (NAs). The OpenLCA version 1.10.3 software was utilized for modeling the processes analyzed in this study and the life cycle inputs/outputs associated with the functional unit characterized during the life cycle impact assessment phase using the TRACI v.2.1 method. The production cost analysis was then applied to compare the investigated asphalt mixtures. The results showed that the impact of the processes associated with the production of RCA is the best for all the analyzed impact categories than NA. For the asphalt mixture production, the environmental impact of WMA with Sasobit as an organic additive was lower than HMA by 5–10%, while WMA with Asphamin as a synthetic zeolite additive increased the environmental impact values by 4–43%. In terms of production cost, the HMA showed the lowest cost compared to WMA. In addition, the use of RCA as a substitution to NA yielded a slight decrease of up to 4% in the total production of the asphalt mixtures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 3","pages":"1462 - 1477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative life cycle assessment of asphalt mixtures containing recycled concrete aggregate in Egypt\",\"authors\":\"D. El-Tahan, A. Gabr, S. Dessouky, S. El-Badawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-025-02191-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) for hot mix asphalt (HMA) and warm mix asphalts (WMAs) manufactured using two different technologies. The investigated asphalt mixtures were prepared with recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) as a replacement for coarse natural aggregates (NAs). The OpenLCA version 1.10.3 software was utilized for modeling the processes analyzed in this study and the life cycle inputs/outputs associated with the functional unit characterized during the life cycle impact assessment phase using the TRACI v.2.1 method. The production cost analysis was then applied to compare the investigated asphalt mixtures. The results showed that the impact of the processes associated with the production of RCA is the best for all the analyzed impact categories than NA. For the asphalt mixture production, the environmental impact of WMA with Sasobit as an organic additive was lower than HMA by 5–10%, while WMA with Asphamin as a synthetic zeolite additive increased the environmental impact values by 4–43%. In terms of production cost, the HMA showed the lowest cost compared to WMA. In addition, the use of RCA as a substitution to NA yielded a slight decrease of up to 4% in the total production of the asphalt mixtures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"1462 - 1477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02191-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02191-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative life cycle assessment of asphalt mixtures containing recycled concrete aggregate in Egypt
This paper presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) for hot mix asphalt (HMA) and warm mix asphalts (WMAs) manufactured using two different technologies. The investigated asphalt mixtures were prepared with recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) as a replacement for coarse natural aggregates (NAs). The OpenLCA version 1.10.3 software was utilized for modeling the processes analyzed in this study and the life cycle inputs/outputs associated with the functional unit characterized during the life cycle impact assessment phase using the TRACI v.2.1 method. The production cost analysis was then applied to compare the investigated asphalt mixtures. The results showed that the impact of the processes associated with the production of RCA is the best for all the analyzed impact categories than NA. For the asphalt mixture production, the environmental impact of WMA with Sasobit as an organic additive was lower than HMA by 5–10%, while WMA with Asphamin as a synthetic zeolite additive increased the environmental impact values by 4–43%. In terms of production cost, the HMA showed the lowest cost compared to WMA. In addition, the use of RCA as a substitution to NA yielded a slight decrease of up to 4% in the total production of the asphalt mixtures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles.
The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management.
The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).