H. P. D. T. Hewa Pathirana, I. Wijesekara, L. L. W. C. Yalegama, M. A. Jayasinghe, K. P. Waidyarathne, C. N. Hitigedera
{"title":"富含特定成分的增值椰子(Cocos nucifera L)琼脂的血糖生成指数预测模型","authors":"H. P. D. T. Hewa Pathirana, I. Wijesekara, L. L. W. C. Yalegama, M. A. Jayasinghe, K. P. Waidyarathne, C. N. Hitigedera","doi":"10.1007/s12355-025-01535-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coconut (<i>Cocos nucifera</i> L) jaggery is an alternative sweetener, especially among rural Asian communities. The focus of this study is the evaluation of <i>in vitro</i> digestibility and prediction of glycemic index (PGI) for four types of coconut jaggery; jaggery produced from traditional sap collection method using hal bark (<i>Vateria capalifera</i>) (HAL Jaggery), the jaggery prepared from pure sap collected from a novel sap collection device (NSCM Jaggery), jaggery from collected sap through a novel sap collection method with 0.2% cinnamon (<i>Cinnamomum zeylanicum)</i> (CIN Jaggery) and the jaggery value added with 0.05% of nutmeg (<i>Myristica fragrans)</i> (NUT Jaggery). Digestion and digestibility tests for each type of sweetener were done with cane sugar as a comparison. Results revealed that four types of jaggery have different hydrolysis rates from 30 to 180 min. The hydrolysis index (HI) of cane sugar was significantly higher than that of the others (55 ± 0.023%), whereas the lowest HI was observed in NUT Jaggery (32 ± 0.014%). According to the <i>in vitro</i> glycemic prediction, all four types of coconut jaggery samples were categorized under a medium GI sweetener, while cane sugar was categorized as a high GI (69.91 ± 0.02) sweetener.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"27 3","pages":"765 - 770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Modeling of Glycemic Indices of Value-Added Coconut (Cocos nucifera L) Jaggery Enriched with Specific Ingredients\",\"authors\":\"H. P. D. T. Hewa Pathirana, I. Wijesekara, L. L. W. C. Yalegama, M. A. Jayasinghe, K. P. Waidyarathne, C. N. Hitigedera\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12355-025-01535-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Coconut (<i>Cocos nucifera</i> L) jaggery is an alternative sweetener, especially among rural Asian communities. The focus of this study is the evaluation of <i>in vitro</i> digestibility and prediction of glycemic index (PGI) for four types of coconut jaggery; jaggery produced from traditional sap collection method using hal bark (<i>Vateria capalifera</i>) (HAL Jaggery), the jaggery prepared from pure sap collected from a novel sap collection device (NSCM Jaggery), jaggery from collected sap through a novel sap collection method with 0.2% cinnamon (<i>Cinnamomum zeylanicum)</i> (CIN Jaggery) and the jaggery value added with 0.05% of nutmeg (<i>Myristica fragrans)</i> (NUT Jaggery). Digestion and digestibility tests for each type of sweetener were done with cane sugar as a comparison. Results revealed that four types of jaggery have different hydrolysis rates from 30 to 180 min. The hydrolysis index (HI) of cane sugar was significantly higher than that of the others (55 ± 0.023%), whereas the lowest HI was observed in NUT Jaggery (32 ± 0.014%). According to the <i>in vitro</i> glycemic prediction, all four types of coconut jaggery samples were categorized under a medium GI sweetener, while cane sugar was categorized as a high GI (69.91 ± 0.02) sweetener.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sugar Tech\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"765 - 770\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sugar Tech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-025-01535-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-025-01535-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictive Modeling of Glycemic Indices of Value-Added Coconut (Cocos nucifera L) Jaggery Enriched with Specific Ingredients
Coconut (Cocos nucifera L) jaggery is an alternative sweetener, especially among rural Asian communities. The focus of this study is the evaluation of in vitro digestibility and prediction of glycemic index (PGI) for four types of coconut jaggery; jaggery produced from traditional sap collection method using hal bark (Vateria capalifera) (HAL Jaggery), the jaggery prepared from pure sap collected from a novel sap collection device (NSCM Jaggery), jaggery from collected sap through a novel sap collection method with 0.2% cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) (CIN Jaggery) and the jaggery value added with 0.05% of nutmeg (Myristica fragrans) (NUT Jaggery). Digestion and digestibility tests for each type of sweetener were done with cane sugar as a comparison. Results revealed that four types of jaggery have different hydrolysis rates from 30 to 180 min. The hydrolysis index (HI) of cane sugar was significantly higher than that of the others (55 ± 0.023%), whereas the lowest HI was observed in NUT Jaggery (32 ± 0.014%). According to the in vitro glycemic prediction, all four types of coconut jaggery samples were categorized under a medium GI sweetener, while cane sugar was categorized as a high GI (69.91 ± 0.02) sweetener.
期刊介绍:
The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.