{"title":"松嫩地块东部新元古代变质沉积岩:中亚造山带东部微大陆块体早期演化及构造亲和意义","authors":"Yi-Ting Xue , Jie Tang , Wen-Li Hao , Jin-Peng Luan , Xin-Yu Long , Shuang Liang , Ji-Shuang Ding , Wen-Liang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.precamres.2025.107791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The early tectonic evolution and affinity of microcontinental massifs in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt are uncertain. Here, we present LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb and <em>in situ</em> mica Rb–Sr ages, zircon Hf isotopic compositions, and geochemical data for metasedimentary rocks in the eastern Songnen Massif in NE China to constrain their depositional ages and sedimentary provenance, and decipher the early tectonic evolution and affinity of the Songnen Massif. The detrital zircon U–Pb ages yield seven main Neoproterozoic age populations, at ca. 730, ca. 760, ca. 795, ca. 830, ca. 855, ca. 890, and ca. 930 Ma, with six Paleo–Mesoproterozoic and Archean populations at ca. 1020, 1520–1220, 1750–1600, 2050–1950, 2500–2300, and ca. 2800 Ma. Combining this with the ages of later intrusive rocks and overlying sedimentary rocks, we conclude that the Xinxing and Hongguang formations of the Zhangguangcailing Group and the Liangzihe and Honglin formations of the Dongfengshan Group in the study area were deposited during the Neoproterozoic. The <em>in situ</em> mica Rb–Sr ages of the Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks suggest that metamorphism occurred during the Middle–Late Jurassic in the eastern Songnen Massif, possibly related to closure of the Mudanjiang Ocean between the Songnen and Jiamusi massifs. Geochemical data for these Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks suggest that they were sourced mainly from felsic igneous rocks located close to the sedimentary basin. Furthermore, the consistency between Neoproterozoic detrital zircon age populations and the episodes of magmatism documented in the eastern Songnen Massif suggests that the Neoproterozoic detritus was sourced from the Songnen Massif itself. The occurrence of Paleoproterozoic–Mesoproterozoic detrital zircon grains, together with two-stage Hf model (T<sub>DM2</sub>) ages (2.2–1.0 Ga) of zircon grains from Neoproterozoic granitoids, indicates that Paleoproterozoic–Mesoproterozoic crustal material existed in the Songnen Massif. The metasedimentary rocks of the Zhangguangcailing and Dongfengshan groups have similar geochemical compositions and detrital zircon age populations, suggesting that they were formed in a continental arc setting. In addition, the Neoproterozoic–early Paleozoic detrital zircon age peaks, metamorphism, and sedimentary environment of Neoproterozoic strata suggest that the Songnen Massif was part of the North Indo-Australie Orogen and located close to the Tarim Craton during the Neoproterozoic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49674,"journal":{"name":"Precambrian Research","volume":"422 ","pages":"Article 107791"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks in the eastern Songnen Massif, NE China: Implications for the early evolution and tectonic affinity of microcontinental massifs in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic belt\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Ting Xue , Jie Tang , Wen-Li Hao , Jin-Peng Luan , Xin-Yu Long , Shuang Liang , Ji-Shuang Ding , Wen-Liang Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.precamres.2025.107791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The early tectonic evolution and affinity of microcontinental massifs in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt are uncertain. Here, we present LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb and <em>in situ</em> mica Rb–Sr ages, zircon Hf isotopic compositions, and geochemical data for metasedimentary rocks in the eastern Songnen Massif in NE China to constrain their depositional ages and sedimentary provenance, and decipher the early tectonic evolution and affinity of the Songnen Massif. The detrital zircon U–Pb ages yield seven main Neoproterozoic age populations, at ca. 730, ca. 760, ca. 795, ca. 830, ca. 855, ca. 890, and ca. 930 Ma, with six Paleo–Mesoproterozoic and Archean populations at ca. 1020, 1520–1220, 1750–1600, 2050–1950, 2500–2300, and ca. 2800 Ma. Combining this with the ages of later intrusive rocks and overlying sedimentary rocks, we conclude that the Xinxing and Hongguang formations of the Zhangguangcailing Group and the Liangzihe and Honglin formations of the Dongfengshan Group in the study area were deposited during the Neoproterozoic. The <em>in situ</em> mica Rb–Sr ages of the Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks suggest that metamorphism occurred during the Middle–Late Jurassic in the eastern Songnen Massif, possibly related to closure of the Mudanjiang Ocean between the Songnen and Jiamusi massifs. Geochemical data for these Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks suggest that they were sourced mainly from felsic igneous rocks located close to the sedimentary basin. Furthermore, the consistency between Neoproterozoic detrital zircon age populations and the episodes of magmatism documented in the eastern Songnen Massif suggests that the Neoproterozoic detritus was sourced from the Songnen Massif itself. The occurrence of Paleoproterozoic–Mesoproterozoic detrital zircon grains, together with two-stage Hf model (T<sub>DM2</sub>) ages (2.2–1.0 Ga) of zircon grains from Neoproterozoic granitoids, indicates that Paleoproterozoic–Mesoproterozoic crustal material existed in the Songnen Massif. The metasedimentary rocks of the Zhangguangcailing and Dongfengshan groups have similar geochemical compositions and detrital zircon age populations, suggesting that they were formed in a continental arc setting. In addition, the Neoproterozoic–early Paleozoic detrital zircon age peaks, metamorphism, and sedimentary environment of Neoproterozoic strata suggest that the Songnen Massif was part of the North Indo-Australie Orogen and located close to the Tarim Craton during the Neoproterozoic.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precambrian Research\",\"volume\":\"422 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precambrian Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926825001172\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precambrian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926825001172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
中亚造山带东部微大陆块体的早期构造演化和亲缘关系尚不确定。在此,我们介绍了中国东北松嫩地块东部锆石U-Pb年龄、原位云母Rb-Sr年龄、锆石Hf同位素组成和地球化学数据,以确定其沉积年龄和沉积产地,并解读松嫩地块的早期构造演化和亲缘关系。碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄得出了七个主要的新元古代年龄群,分别位于约1020 Ma、1520-1220 Ma、1750-1600 Ma、2050-1950 Ma、2500-2300 Ma 和 2800 Ma。结合后期侵入岩和上覆沉积岩的年龄,我们认为研究区内的张广才岭组新兴层、红光层和东风山组梁子河层、红林层沉积于新元古代。新新生代变质岩的原位云母Rb-Sr年龄表明,松嫩地块东部的变质作用发生在中-晚侏罗世,可能与松嫩地块和佳木斯地块之间牡丹江洋的闭合有关。这些新新生代变质岩的地球化学数据表明,它们主要来源于沉积盆地附近的长粒火成岩。此外,新新生代碎屑锆石年龄群与松嫩平原东部记录的岩浆活动之间的一致性表明,新新生代碎屑岩来源于松嫩平原本身。古生代-中生代锆石碎屑颗粒的出现,以及新元古代花岗岩中锆石颗粒的两级Hf模型(TDM2)年龄(2.2-1.0 Ga),表明松嫩平原存在古生代-中生代地壳物质。张广才岭组和东风山组的变质岩具有相似的地球化学组成和锆英石年龄群,表明它们是在大陆弧环境中形成的。此外,新元古代-早古生代的锆英石年龄峰值、变质作用和新元古代地层的沉积环境表明,松嫩平原在新元古代是北印度-澳大利亚造山带的一部分,并靠近塔里木克拉通。
Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks in the eastern Songnen Massif, NE China: Implications for the early evolution and tectonic affinity of microcontinental massifs in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic belt
The early tectonic evolution and affinity of microcontinental massifs in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt are uncertain. Here, we present LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb and in situ mica Rb–Sr ages, zircon Hf isotopic compositions, and geochemical data for metasedimentary rocks in the eastern Songnen Massif in NE China to constrain their depositional ages and sedimentary provenance, and decipher the early tectonic evolution and affinity of the Songnen Massif. The detrital zircon U–Pb ages yield seven main Neoproterozoic age populations, at ca. 730, ca. 760, ca. 795, ca. 830, ca. 855, ca. 890, and ca. 930 Ma, with six Paleo–Mesoproterozoic and Archean populations at ca. 1020, 1520–1220, 1750–1600, 2050–1950, 2500–2300, and ca. 2800 Ma. Combining this with the ages of later intrusive rocks and overlying sedimentary rocks, we conclude that the Xinxing and Hongguang formations of the Zhangguangcailing Group and the Liangzihe and Honglin formations of the Dongfengshan Group in the study area were deposited during the Neoproterozoic. The in situ mica Rb–Sr ages of the Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks suggest that metamorphism occurred during the Middle–Late Jurassic in the eastern Songnen Massif, possibly related to closure of the Mudanjiang Ocean between the Songnen and Jiamusi massifs. Geochemical data for these Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks suggest that they were sourced mainly from felsic igneous rocks located close to the sedimentary basin. Furthermore, the consistency between Neoproterozoic detrital zircon age populations and the episodes of magmatism documented in the eastern Songnen Massif suggests that the Neoproterozoic detritus was sourced from the Songnen Massif itself. The occurrence of Paleoproterozoic–Mesoproterozoic detrital zircon grains, together with two-stage Hf model (TDM2) ages (2.2–1.0 Ga) of zircon grains from Neoproterozoic granitoids, indicates that Paleoproterozoic–Mesoproterozoic crustal material existed in the Songnen Massif. The metasedimentary rocks of the Zhangguangcailing and Dongfengshan groups have similar geochemical compositions and detrital zircon age populations, suggesting that they were formed in a continental arc setting. In addition, the Neoproterozoic–early Paleozoic detrital zircon age peaks, metamorphism, and sedimentary environment of Neoproterozoic strata suggest that the Songnen Massif was part of the North Indo-Australie Orogen and located close to the Tarim Craton during the Neoproterozoic.
期刊介绍:
Precambrian Research publishes studies on all aspects of the early stages of the composition, structure and evolution of the Earth and its planetary neighbours. With a focus on process-oriented and comparative studies, it covers, but is not restricted to, subjects such as:
(1) Chemical, biological, biochemical and cosmochemical evolution; the origin of life; the evolution of the oceans and atmosphere; the early fossil record; palaeobiology;
(2) Geochronology and isotope and elemental geochemistry;
(3) Precambrian mineral deposits;
(4) Geophysical aspects of the early Earth and Precambrian terrains;
(5) Nature, formation and evolution of the Precambrian lithosphere and mantle including magmatic, depositional, metamorphic and tectonic processes.
In addition, the editors particularly welcome integrated process-oriented studies that involve a combination of the above fields and comparative studies that demonstrate the effect of Precambrian evolution on Phanerozoic earth system processes.
Regional and localised studies of Precambrian phenomena are considered appropriate only when the detail and quality allow illustration of a wider process, or when significant gaps in basic knowledge of a particular area can be filled.