小儿麻醉中雷马唑仑诱导镇静的时间特征:回复

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1111/anae.16615
Yu-Bo Fang, Hua-Cheng Liu
{"title":"小儿麻醉中雷马唑仑诱导镇静的时间特征:回复","authors":"Yu-Bo Fang, Hua-Cheng Liu","doi":"10.1111/anae.16615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We appreciate the insightful commentary from Li et al. [<span>1</span>]. In our multicentre trial, the median time to loss of consciousness during induction of anaesthesia was 45 s and 25 s, for children aged 3–6 y receiving 0.3 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> remimazolam vs. 2.5 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> propofol, respectively [<span>2</span>]. Although the pharmacokinetic simulation from Li et al. suggests increased drug efficacy, our findings regarding time to loss of consciousness were consistent with previous paediatric research [<span>3</span>]. The use of remimazolam monotherapy for anaesthetic induction did indeed necessitate higher doses [<span>4</span>]. Notably, opioid co-administration can reduce the dose of sedative drugs, and our protocol for anaesthesia induction included intravenous administration of 3 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> fentanyl 3 min before injection of the study drugs. Consequently, we observed a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score of 3 or 2 in some patients before injection of the study drugs. This sequential approach was designed specifically to synchronise tracheal intubation with the peak opioid analgesic effect, accounting for known pharmacokinetic variability in paediatric populations.</p>\n<p>Regarding the methods, our protocol mandated randomised administration of initial bolus doses; an injection duration &lt; 60 s; and a standardised assessment of loss of consciousness with no response to gentle shoulder shaking. Consequently, establishing robust temporal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models between sedative drug administration and loss of consciousness through covariate-adjusted analyses (e.g. age, sex and BMI) using both linear and logistic regression approaches is crucial in optimising safe and effective anaesthetic induction in paediatric anaesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal characteristics of remimazolam-induced sedation in paediatric anaesthesia: a reply\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Bo Fang, Hua-Cheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We appreciate the insightful commentary from Li et al. [<span>1</span>]. In our multicentre trial, the median time to loss of consciousness during induction of anaesthesia was 45 s and 25 s, for children aged 3–6 y receiving 0.3 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> remimazolam vs. 2.5 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> propofol, respectively [<span>2</span>]. Although the pharmacokinetic simulation from Li et al. suggests increased drug efficacy, our findings regarding time to loss of consciousness were consistent with previous paediatric research [<span>3</span>]. The use of remimazolam monotherapy for anaesthetic induction did indeed necessitate higher doses [<span>4</span>]. Notably, opioid co-administration can reduce the dose of sedative drugs, and our protocol for anaesthesia induction included intravenous administration of 3 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> fentanyl 3 min before injection of the study drugs. Consequently, we observed a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score of 3 or 2 in some patients before injection of the study drugs. This sequential approach was designed specifically to synchronise tracheal intubation with the peak opioid analgesic effect, accounting for known pharmacokinetic variability in paediatric populations.</p>\\n<p>Regarding the methods, our protocol mandated randomised administration of initial bolus doses; an injection duration &lt; 60 s; and a standardised assessment of loss of consciousness with no response to gentle shoulder shaking. Consequently, establishing robust temporal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models between sedative drug administration and loss of consciousness through covariate-adjusted analyses (e.g. age, sex and BMI) using both linear and logistic regression approaches is crucial in optimising safe and effective anaesthetic induction in paediatric anaesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16615\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16615","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们感谢Li等人的深刻评论。在我们的多中心试验中,对于3-6岁接受0.3 mg麻醉的儿童,诱导麻醉期间意识丧失的中位时间为45秒和25秒。Kg-1雷马唑仑vs. 2.5 mg。Kg-1异丙酚,分别为[2]。虽然Li等人的药代动力学模拟表明药物疗效增加,但我们关于意识丧失时间的发现与先前的儿科研究一致[10]。使用雷马唑仑单药治疗麻醉诱导确实需要更高的剂量。值得注意的是,阿片类药物联合给药可以减少镇静药物的剂量,我们的麻醉诱导方案包括静脉给药3 μg。Kg-1芬太尼在注射研究药物前3分钟。因此,我们观察到一些患者在注射研究药物前的警觉性/镇静评分为3或2。这种顺序方法专门用于同步气管插管与阿片类镇痛作用的峰值,考虑到儿科人群中已知的药代动力学变异性。关于方法,我们的方案要求随机给药初始剂量;注射时间60秒;还有对意识丧失的标准评估如果轻微的肩部晃动没有反应。因此,通过使用线性和逻辑回归方法进行协变量调整分析(如年龄、性别和体重指数),在镇静药物给药和意识丧失之间建立可靠的时间药代动力学-药效学模型,对于优化安全有效的儿科麻醉诱导至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal characteristics of remimazolam-induced sedation in paediatric anaesthesia: a reply

We appreciate the insightful commentary from Li et al. [1]. In our multicentre trial, the median time to loss of consciousness during induction of anaesthesia was 45 s and 25 s, for children aged 3–6 y receiving 0.3 mg.kg-1 remimazolam vs. 2.5 mg.kg-1 propofol, respectively [2]. Although the pharmacokinetic simulation from Li et al. suggests increased drug efficacy, our findings regarding time to loss of consciousness were consistent with previous paediatric research [3]. The use of remimazolam monotherapy for anaesthetic induction did indeed necessitate higher doses [4]. Notably, opioid co-administration can reduce the dose of sedative drugs, and our protocol for anaesthesia induction included intravenous administration of 3 μg.kg-1 fentanyl 3 min before injection of the study drugs. Consequently, we observed a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score of 3 or 2 in some patients before injection of the study drugs. This sequential approach was designed specifically to synchronise tracheal intubation with the peak opioid analgesic effect, accounting for known pharmacokinetic variability in paediatric populations.

Regarding the methods, our protocol mandated randomised administration of initial bolus doses; an injection duration < 60 s; and a standardised assessment of loss of consciousness with no response to gentle shoulder shaking. Consequently, establishing robust temporal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models between sedative drug administration and loss of consciousness through covariate-adjusted analyses (e.g. age, sex and BMI) using both linear and logistic regression approaches is crucial in optimising safe and effective anaesthetic induction in paediatric anaesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信