多韧带膝关节损伤患者术后康复机会有限,患者报告的结果相似:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Shane S. Korber, Amir Fathi, Ioanna K. Bolia, Cailan L. Feingold, Eric H. Lin, Samantha A. Solaru, Neilen Benvegnu, Joseph N. Liu, George F. Rick Hatch 3rd
{"title":"多韧带膝关节损伤患者术后康复机会有限,患者报告的结果相似:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Shane S. Korber,&nbsp;Amir Fathi,&nbsp;Ioanna K. Bolia,&nbsp;Cailan L. Feingold,&nbsp;Eric H. Lin,&nbsp;Samantha A. Solaru,&nbsp;Neilen Benvegnu,&nbsp;Joseph N. Liu,&nbsp;George F. Rick Hatch 3rd","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) are typically high-energy traumatic injuries requiring surgical reconstruction and extensive post-operative rehabilitation. This study aimed to examine differences in outcomes of patients with different access to post-operative rehabilitation following multiligament knee reconstruction (MLKR). We hypothesize that patients with limited access to rehabilitation will demonstrate worse outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who sustained an MLKI between 2007 and 2019 and who underwent MLKR by a single surgeon were retrospectively identified and invited to participate. Patients less than 1 year post-operative were excluded. Data recorded included patient demographics, intraoperative procedure performed, patient access to rehabilitation after surgery (limited versus full access), and multiple post-operative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A comparison of PROMs was performed between patients with limited versus full access to rehabilitation using descriptive statistics (STATA). The level of statistical significance was set at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-three patients (17.4% female) met the inclusion criteria and had accessible rehabilitation data. Of those, 69 (83.1%) patients had full access to rehabilitation, and 14 patients (16.9%) had limited access to post-operative rehabilitation. There was no difference in mean follow-up time (2.6 and 2.2 years, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.96) or baseline patient characteristics. Patients with limited access to post-operative rehabilitation had significantly worse Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and PROMIS Physical Function (<i>p</i> = 0.023) scores compared to patients with full access to rehabilitation. PROMIS mobility, Lysholm and multiligament quality of life (MLQOL) measures were not significantly different.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent MLKI reconstruction with limited access to rehabilitation demonstrated worse PROMIS pain and physical function scores than those with full access to rehabilitation in the short term. However, these differences do not meet minimum clinically important difference values, suggesting similar outcomes. Other PROMs, such as PROMIS mobility, Lysholm and MLQOL scores, were similar between patients with and without full access to rehabilitation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70245","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiligament knee injury patients with limited access to post-operative rehabilitation exhibit similar patient-reported outcomes: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Shane S. Korber,&nbsp;Amir Fathi,&nbsp;Ioanna K. Bolia,&nbsp;Cailan L. Feingold,&nbsp;Eric H. Lin,&nbsp;Samantha A. Solaru,&nbsp;Neilen Benvegnu,&nbsp;Joseph N. Liu,&nbsp;George F. Rick Hatch 3rd\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) are typically high-energy traumatic injuries requiring surgical reconstruction and extensive post-operative rehabilitation. This study aimed to examine differences in outcomes of patients with different access to post-operative rehabilitation following multiligament knee reconstruction (MLKR). We hypothesize that patients with limited access to rehabilitation will demonstrate worse outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who sustained an MLKI between 2007 and 2019 and who underwent MLKR by a single surgeon were retrospectively identified and invited to participate. Patients less than 1 year post-operative were excluded. Data recorded included patient demographics, intraoperative procedure performed, patient access to rehabilitation after surgery (limited versus full access), and multiple post-operative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A comparison of PROMs was performed between patients with limited versus full access to rehabilitation using descriptive statistics (STATA). The level of statistical significance was set at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighty-three patients (17.4% female) met the inclusion criteria and had accessible rehabilitation data. Of those, 69 (83.1%) patients had full access to rehabilitation, and 14 patients (16.9%) had limited access to post-operative rehabilitation. There was no difference in mean follow-up time (2.6 and 2.2 years, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.96) or baseline patient characteristics. Patients with limited access to post-operative rehabilitation had significantly worse Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and PROMIS Physical Function (<i>p</i> = 0.023) scores compared to patients with full access to rehabilitation. PROMIS mobility, Lysholm and multiligament quality of life (MLQOL) measures were not significantly different.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who underwent MLKI reconstruction with limited access to rehabilitation demonstrated worse PROMIS pain and physical function scores than those with full access to rehabilitation in the short term. However, these differences do not meet minimum clinically important difference values, suggesting similar outcomes. Other PROMs, such as PROMIS mobility, Lysholm and MLQOL scores, were similar between patients with and without full access to rehabilitation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70245\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的膝关节多韧带损伤(MLKI)是一种典型的高能外伤性损伤,需要手术重建和广泛的术后康复。本研究旨在探讨多韧带膝关节重建(MLKR)术后不同康复途径患者预后的差异。我们假设获得康复机会有限的患者会表现出更差的结果。方法回顾性分析2007年至2019年期间接受MLKI手术并由单一外科医生行MLKR手术的患者。排除术后1年以内的患者。记录的数据包括患者人口统计、术中操作、患者术后康复(有限与完全康复)和多个术后患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。使用描述性统计(STATA)对有限和完全康复患者的PROMs进行比较。p <; 0.05为显著性水平。结果83例患者(女性17.4%)符合纳入标准,康复资料可及。其中,69例(83.1%)患者完全康复,14例(16.9%)患者术后康复受限。平均随访时间(分别为2.6年和2.2年,p = 0.96)和基线患者特征均无差异。术后康复机会有限的患者与完全康复的患者相比,患者报告的预后测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛(p = 0.021)和PROMIS身体功能(p = 0.023)评分明显较差。PROMIS活动度、Lysholm和多韧带生活质量(MLQOL)指标无显著差异。结论接受MLKI重建且康复受限的患者在短期内表现出较差的PROMIS疼痛和身体功能评分。然而,这些差异不满足最小临床重要差异值,提示相似的结果。其他PROMs,如PROMIS流动性,Lysholm和MLQOL评分,在有和没有完全获得康复的患者之间相似。证据水平III级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multiligament knee injury patients with limited access to post-operative rehabilitation exhibit similar patient-reported outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

Multiligament knee injury patients with limited access to post-operative rehabilitation exhibit similar patient-reported outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

Purpose

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) are typically high-energy traumatic injuries requiring surgical reconstruction and extensive post-operative rehabilitation. This study aimed to examine differences in outcomes of patients with different access to post-operative rehabilitation following multiligament knee reconstruction (MLKR). We hypothesize that patients with limited access to rehabilitation will demonstrate worse outcomes.

Methods

Patients who sustained an MLKI between 2007 and 2019 and who underwent MLKR by a single surgeon were retrospectively identified and invited to participate. Patients less than 1 year post-operative were excluded. Data recorded included patient demographics, intraoperative procedure performed, patient access to rehabilitation after surgery (limited versus full access), and multiple post-operative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A comparison of PROMs was performed between patients with limited versus full access to rehabilitation using descriptive statistics (STATA). The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Eighty-three patients (17.4% female) met the inclusion criteria and had accessible rehabilitation data. Of those, 69 (83.1%) patients had full access to rehabilitation, and 14 patients (16.9%) had limited access to post-operative rehabilitation. There was no difference in mean follow-up time (2.6 and 2.2 years, respectively, p = 0.96) or baseline patient characteristics. Patients with limited access to post-operative rehabilitation had significantly worse Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain (p = 0.021) and PROMIS Physical Function (p = 0.023) scores compared to patients with full access to rehabilitation. PROMIS mobility, Lysholm and multiligament quality of life (MLQOL) measures were not significantly different.

Conclusion

Patients who underwent MLKI reconstruction with limited access to rehabilitation demonstrated worse PROMIS pain and physical function scores than those with full access to rehabilitation in the short term. However, these differences do not meet minimum clinically important difference values, suggesting similar outcomes. Other PROMs, such as PROMIS mobility, Lysholm and MLQOL scores, were similar between patients with and without full access to rehabilitation.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信