基于机器人的SIPE训练促进患者认知参与:一项随机对照研究

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Chun-Chun Chang, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Liang-Shiou Ou
{"title":"基于机器人的SIPE训练促进患者认知参与:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Chun-Chun Chang,&nbsp;Gwo-Jen Hwang,&nbsp;Liang-Shiou Ou","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Health education aims to encourage individuals to voluntarily take action to improve their health. Throughout this process, adult learners can make informed decisions to change their behaviours and enhance their well-being. In medical institutions, employing appropriate instructional strategies to facilitate changes in health behaviours is crucial for enhancing patients' health knowledge, attitudes, and skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Health education courses within hospitals are based on the Selection-Instruction-Practicing-Evaluation (SIPE) model, which is grounded in the self-determination theory (SDT). Due to constraints in human resources, the traditional SIPE (T-SIPE) mode is generally carried out with one-way practice without evaluating learners' outcomes or providing personalised feedback. This limitation hampers patients' self-care abilities and self-confidence. By referencing the embodied cognition theory, a robot-based SIPE (R-SIPE) approach was proposed to enhance patients' cognitive engagement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the approach, a true experiment was conducted in a health education course by randomly assigning 90 subjects to the experimental and control groups, adopting the R-SIPE and T-SIPE modes, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results revealed that the R-SIPE group showed better learning achievement, self-confidence, technology acceptance, and learning satisfaction compared to the T-SIPE group. It was concluded that using robots to provide interactive learning, personalised materials, practice tests, and evaluation had great potential in health education. It is therefore suggested that different health education courses be developed to enhance patients' self-care abilities and increase their confidence in dealing with diseases.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting Patients' Cognitive Engagement With Robot-Based SIPE Training: A Randomised Controlled Study\",\"authors\":\"Chun-Chun Chang,&nbsp;Gwo-Jen Hwang,&nbsp;Liang-Shiou Ou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcal.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Health education aims to encourage individuals to voluntarily take action to improve their health. Throughout this process, adult learners can make informed decisions to change their behaviours and enhance their well-being. In medical institutions, employing appropriate instructional strategies to facilitate changes in health behaviours is crucial for enhancing patients' health knowledge, attitudes, and skills.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Health education courses within hospitals are based on the Selection-Instruction-Practicing-Evaluation (SIPE) model, which is grounded in the self-determination theory (SDT). Due to constraints in human resources, the traditional SIPE (T-SIPE) mode is generally carried out with one-way practice without evaluating learners' outcomes or providing personalised feedback. This limitation hampers patients' self-care abilities and self-confidence. By referencing the embodied cognition theory, a robot-based SIPE (R-SIPE) approach was proposed to enhance patients' cognitive engagement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the approach, a true experiment was conducted in a health education course by randomly assigning 90 subjects to the experimental and control groups, adopting the R-SIPE and T-SIPE modes, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results revealed that the R-SIPE group showed better learning achievement, self-confidence, technology acceptance, and learning satisfaction compared to the T-SIPE group. It was concluded that using robots to provide interactive learning, personalised materials, practice tests, and evaluation had great potential in health education. It is therefore suggested that different health education courses be developed to enhance patients' self-care abilities and increase their confidence in dealing with diseases.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康教育的目的是鼓励个人自愿采取行动来改善他们的健康。在这个过程中,成人学习者可以做出明智的决定来改变他们的行为,提高他们的幸福感。在医疗机构中,采用适当的教学策略促进健康行为的改变,对于提高患者的健康知识、态度和技能至关重要。目的医院健康教育课程建立在以自我决定理论为基础的选择-指导-实践-评价(SIPE)模式之上。由于人力资源的限制,传统的SIPE (T-SIPE)模式通常是单向的练习,不评估学习者的结果或提供个性化的反馈。这种限制阻碍了患者的自我照顾能力和自信心。参考具身认知理论,提出了一种基于机器人的SIPE (R-SIPE)方法来提高患者的认知参与。方法在某健康教育课程中进行真实实验,将90名受试者随机分为实验组和对照组,分别采用R-SIPE和T-SIPE模式。结果与结论与T-SIPE组相比,R-SIPE组在学习成绩、自信心、技术接受度和学习满意度方面均有显著提高。结论认为,利用机器人提供互动学习、个性化材料、实践测试和评估在健康教育中具有很大的潜力。因此,建议开设不同的健康教育课程,以提高病人的自我照顾能力,增强他们处理疾病的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting Patients' Cognitive Engagement With Robot-Based SIPE Training: A Randomised Controlled Study

Background

Health education aims to encourage individuals to voluntarily take action to improve their health. Throughout this process, adult learners can make informed decisions to change their behaviours and enhance their well-being. In medical institutions, employing appropriate instructional strategies to facilitate changes in health behaviours is crucial for enhancing patients' health knowledge, attitudes, and skills.

Objective

Health education courses within hospitals are based on the Selection-Instruction-Practicing-Evaluation (SIPE) model, which is grounded in the self-determination theory (SDT). Due to constraints in human resources, the traditional SIPE (T-SIPE) mode is generally carried out with one-way practice without evaluating learners' outcomes or providing personalised feedback. This limitation hampers patients' self-care abilities and self-confidence. By referencing the embodied cognition theory, a robot-based SIPE (R-SIPE) approach was proposed to enhance patients' cognitive engagement.

Method

To assess the approach, a true experiment was conducted in a health education course by randomly assigning 90 subjects to the experimental and control groups, adopting the R-SIPE and T-SIPE modes, respectively.

Results and Conclusions

The results revealed that the R-SIPE group showed better learning achievement, self-confidence, technology acceptance, and learning satisfaction compared to the T-SIPE group. It was concluded that using robots to provide interactive learning, personalised materials, practice tests, and evaluation had great potential in health education. It is therefore suggested that different health education courses be developed to enhance patients' self-care abilities and increase their confidence in dealing with diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信