护理团队属性预测在住院病人开处方时利用药物基因组信息的可能性

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Zhong Huang, Matthew Jack, Kevin J. O'Leary, Edith A. Nutescu, Thomas Chen, Gregory W. Ruhnke, David George, Larry K. House, Randall Knoebel, Seth Hartman, Anish Choksi, Kiang-Teck J. Yeo, Minoli A. Perera, Mark J. Ratain, David O. Meltzer, Peter H. O'Donnell
{"title":"护理团队属性预测在住院病人开处方时利用药物基因组信息的可能性","authors":"Zhong Huang,&nbsp;Matthew Jack,&nbsp;Kevin J. O'Leary,&nbsp;Edith A. Nutescu,&nbsp;Thomas Chen,&nbsp;Gregory W. Ruhnke,&nbsp;David George,&nbsp;Larry K. House,&nbsp;Randall Knoebel,&nbsp;Seth Hartman,&nbsp;Anish Choksi,&nbsp;Kiang-Teck J. Yeo,&nbsp;Minoli A. Perera,&nbsp;Mark J. Ratain,&nbsp;David O. Meltzer,&nbsp;Peter H. O'Donnell","doi":"10.1111/cts.70193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Medication prescribing is imperfect, and unintended side effects complicate patient care. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is an emerging solution that associates genotypes with personalized drug-related outcomes, but it has not been widely adopted. We hypothesize that patient and provider attributes may predict and promote PGx utilization. We studied PGx using data from the ACCOuNT study, a multi-institutional prospective trial that implemented broad preemptive PGx result delivery for African American inpatients [Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03225820]. Patients were genotyped, and their PGx information was made available within an integrated informatics portal. Utilization of PGx data (defined as the active choice to review PGx information) was left to the enrolled provider's discretion. Our primary endpoint was to identify patient and care team attributes associated with PGx use. We identified statistically significant univariate predictors and utilized logistic regression to compare relative predictiveness. This study included 187 patients (60.4% female, median age 55, 75.4% treated at the University of Chicago, 17.6% at Northwestern University, and 7.0% at the University of Illinois Chicago) and 188 providers (63.8% MD, 22.3% PharmD, 6.4% PA, and 7.4% APN). In multivariate analysis, we found that the use of PGx information in a prior admission significantly predicted the use in subsequent admissions (OR 7.62, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Similarly, pharmacist participation on care teams significantly predicted PGx use (OR 4.52, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). In the first systematic analysis of the impact of patient and care team factors on inpatient PGx clinical decision support (CDS) adoption, we found that actionable care team attributes, such as pharmacist participation or successful initial adoption measures, predict PGx CDS use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70193","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care Team Attributes Predict Likelihood of Utilizing Pharmacogenomic Information During Inpatient Prescribing\",\"authors\":\"Zhong Huang,&nbsp;Matthew Jack,&nbsp;Kevin J. O'Leary,&nbsp;Edith A. Nutescu,&nbsp;Thomas Chen,&nbsp;Gregory W. Ruhnke,&nbsp;David George,&nbsp;Larry K. House,&nbsp;Randall Knoebel,&nbsp;Seth Hartman,&nbsp;Anish Choksi,&nbsp;Kiang-Teck J. Yeo,&nbsp;Minoli A. Perera,&nbsp;Mark J. Ratain,&nbsp;David O. Meltzer,&nbsp;Peter H. O'Donnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Medication prescribing is imperfect, and unintended side effects complicate patient care. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is an emerging solution that associates genotypes with personalized drug-related outcomes, but it has not been widely adopted. We hypothesize that patient and provider attributes may predict and promote PGx utilization. We studied PGx using data from the ACCOuNT study, a multi-institutional prospective trial that implemented broad preemptive PGx result delivery for African American inpatients [Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03225820]. Patients were genotyped, and their PGx information was made available within an integrated informatics portal. Utilization of PGx data (defined as the active choice to review PGx information) was left to the enrolled provider's discretion. Our primary endpoint was to identify patient and care team attributes associated with PGx use. We identified statistically significant univariate predictors and utilized logistic regression to compare relative predictiveness. This study included 187 patients (60.4% female, median age 55, 75.4% treated at the University of Chicago, 17.6% at Northwestern University, and 7.0% at the University of Illinois Chicago) and 188 providers (63.8% MD, 22.3% PharmD, 6.4% PA, and 7.4% APN). In multivariate analysis, we found that the use of PGx information in a prior admission significantly predicted the use in subsequent admissions (OR 7.62, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Similarly, pharmacist participation on care teams significantly predicted PGx use (OR 4.52, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). In the first systematic analysis of the impact of patient and care team factors on inpatient PGx clinical decision support (CDS) adoption, we found that actionable care team attributes, such as pharmacist participation or successful initial adoption measures, predict PGx CDS use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70193\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70193\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物处方是不完美的,意外的副作用使病人护理复杂化。药物基因组学(PGx)是一种新兴的解决方案,将基因型与个性化药物相关的结果联系起来,但尚未被广泛采用。我们假设患者和提供者的属性可以预测和促进PGx的利用。我们使用ACCOuNT研究的数据来研究PGx, ACCOuNT研究是一项多机构前瞻性试验,在非裔美国住院患者中实施了广泛的先发制人的PGx结果传递[Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03225820]。对患者进行基因分型,并在综合信息学门户网站中提供他们的PGx信息。PGx数据的使用(定义为主动选择审查PGx信息)由注册的提供者自行决定。我们的主要终点是确定与PGx使用相关的患者和护理团队属性。我们确定了统计上显著的单变量预测因子,并利用逻辑回归来比较相对预测性。该研究包括187名患者(60.4%为女性,中位年龄55岁,75.4%在芝加哥大学接受治疗,17.6%在西北大学接受治疗,7.0%在伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校接受治疗)和188名提供者(63.8% MD, 22.3% PharmD, 6.4% PA和7.4% APN)。在多变量分析中,我们发现PGx信息在先前入院中的使用显著预测了后续入院的使用(OR 7.62, p < 0.05)。同样,药师参与护理团队显著预测PGx使用(OR 4.52, p < 0.05)。在第一次系统分析患者和护理团队因素对住院患者PGx临床决策支持(CDS)采用的影响时,我们发现可操作的护理团队属性,如药剂师参与或成功的初始采用措施,预测PGx CDS的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Care Team Attributes Predict Likelihood of Utilizing Pharmacogenomic Information During Inpatient Prescribing

Care Team Attributes Predict Likelihood of Utilizing Pharmacogenomic Information During Inpatient Prescribing

Medication prescribing is imperfect, and unintended side effects complicate patient care. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is an emerging solution that associates genotypes with personalized drug-related outcomes, but it has not been widely adopted. We hypothesize that patient and provider attributes may predict and promote PGx utilization. We studied PGx using data from the ACCOuNT study, a multi-institutional prospective trial that implemented broad preemptive PGx result delivery for African American inpatients [Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03225820]. Patients were genotyped, and their PGx information was made available within an integrated informatics portal. Utilization of PGx data (defined as the active choice to review PGx information) was left to the enrolled provider's discretion. Our primary endpoint was to identify patient and care team attributes associated with PGx use. We identified statistically significant univariate predictors and utilized logistic regression to compare relative predictiveness. This study included 187 patients (60.4% female, median age 55, 75.4% treated at the University of Chicago, 17.6% at Northwestern University, and 7.0% at the University of Illinois Chicago) and 188 providers (63.8% MD, 22.3% PharmD, 6.4% PA, and 7.4% APN). In multivariate analysis, we found that the use of PGx information in a prior admission significantly predicted the use in subsequent admissions (OR 7.62, p < 0.05). Similarly, pharmacist participation on care teams significantly predicted PGx use (OR 4.52, p < 0.05). In the first systematic analysis of the impact of patient and care team factors on inpatient PGx clinical decision support (CDS) adoption, we found that actionable care team attributes, such as pharmacist participation or successful initial adoption measures, predict PGx CDS use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信