美国透析机构的商业医疗保险和护理质量

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Anshul Bhatnagar , Allison C. Reaves , Daniel E. Weiner , Kevin F. Erickson
{"title":"美国透析机构的商业医疗保险和护理质量","authors":"Anshul Bhatnagar ,&nbsp;Allison C. Reaves ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Weiner ,&nbsp;Kevin F. Erickson","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.100992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Commercial health insurance typically reimburses at a higher rate for dialysis than Medicare. A recent ruling by the US Supreme Court could result in many commercially insured patients who receive dialysis forgoing their private health insurance and shifting to Medicare as the primary payer. Our objective was to determine whether differences in commercial payers as a proportion of payer mix affect the quality of care at dialysis facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Population</h3><div>We examined US patients receiving dialysis from US Dialysis Facility Reports and the Dialysis Facility Compare websites in 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Exposures</h3><div>Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients with commercial health insurance.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><div>Seven key dialysis facility quality metrics included in Dialysis Facility Compare star ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for observed confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 7,194 US dialysis facilities, an average of 4.4% of prevalent dialysis patients had commercial insurance. Each 10% absolute increase in the percentage of dialysis patients in a facility with commercial insurance was associated with an adjusted 8.3% (3.0%-13.6%) lower standardized mortality ratio. Commercial health insurance was not significantly associated with the remaining quality metrics examined, including standardized fistula rate, long-term catheter rate, standardized hospitalization ratio, standardized transfusion ratio, dialysis adequacy, and In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient experience score.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>The potential for unobserved confounders including social risk factors limits the ability to make causal inferences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><div>Dialysis facilities with a higher percentage of patients with commercial health insurance had better performance in standardized mortality ratio. If this association reflects a causal connection, then increased shifting of coverage from commercial health insurance to Medicare could adversely affect the quality of care at dialysis facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>A recent US Supreme Court decision may lead US patients receiving dialysis to shift from commercial health insurance to Medicare. Our objective was to determine whether differences in commercial payers as a proportion of dialysis facility payer mix affect the quality of care at dialysis facilities. In an analysis of dialysis facility quality ratings from 2019, more commercial insurance was associated with better performance in standardized mortality ratio but not with other key dialysis facility quality measures. This finding suggests that the shifting of coverage from commercial health insurance to Medicare could adversely affect quality of care at US dialysis facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 100992"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial Health Insurance and Quality of Care in US Dialysis Facilities\",\"authors\":\"Anshul Bhatnagar ,&nbsp;Allison C. Reaves ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Weiner ,&nbsp;Kevin F. Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.100992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Commercial health insurance typically reimburses at a higher rate for dialysis than Medicare. A recent ruling by the US Supreme Court could result in many commercially insured patients who receive dialysis forgoing their private health insurance and shifting to Medicare as the primary payer. Our objective was to determine whether differences in commercial payers as a proportion of payer mix affect the quality of care at dialysis facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Population</h3><div>We examined US patients receiving dialysis from US Dialysis Facility Reports and the Dialysis Facility Compare websites in 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Exposures</h3><div>Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients with commercial health insurance.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><div>Seven key dialysis facility quality metrics included in Dialysis Facility Compare star ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for observed confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 7,194 US dialysis facilities, an average of 4.4% of prevalent dialysis patients had commercial insurance. Each 10% absolute increase in the percentage of dialysis patients in a facility with commercial insurance was associated with an adjusted 8.3% (3.0%-13.6%) lower standardized mortality ratio. Commercial health insurance was not significantly associated with the remaining quality metrics examined, including standardized fistula rate, long-term catheter rate, standardized hospitalization ratio, standardized transfusion ratio, dialysis adequacy, and In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient experience score.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>The potential for unobserved confounders including social risk factors limits the ability to make causal inferences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><div>Dialysis facilities with a higher percentage of patients with commercial health insurance had better performance in standardized mortality ratio. If this association reflects a causal connection, then increased shifting of coverage from commercial health insurance to Medicare could adversely affect the quality of care at dialysis facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>A recent US Supreme Court decision may lead US patients receiving dialysis to shift from commercial health insurance to Medicare. Our objective was to determine whether differences in commercial payers as a proportion of dialysis facility payer mix affect the quality of care at dialysis facilities. In an analysis of dialysis facility quality ratings from 2019, more commercial insurance was associated with better performance in standardized mortality ratio but not with other key dialysis facility quality measures. This finding suggests that the shifting of coverage from commercial health insurance to Medicare could adversely affect quality of care at US dialysis facilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 100992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059525000287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059525000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理及目的:商业医疗保险对透析的赔偿率通常高于医疗保险。美国最高法院最近的一项裁决可能会导致许多接受透析的商业保险患者放弃他们的私人健康保险,而转向医疗保险作为主要付款人。我们的目的是确定商业支付者在支付者组合中所占比例的差异是否会影响透析设施的护理质量。研究设计横断面研究。设置,我们调查了2019年从美国透析设施报告和透析设施比较网站接受透析的美国患者。有商业健康保险的流行透析患者的百分比。结果:透析设施比较星级评分中包括七个关键的透析设施质量指标。分析方法根据观察到的混杂因素调整多变量线性回归模型。结果在美国7194个透析机构中,平均4.4%的流行透析患者有商业保险。在有商业保险的机构中透析患者的绝对百分比每增加10%,标准化死亡率就会降低8.3%(3.0%-13.6%)。商业健康保险与检验的其他质量指标没有显著相关,包括标准化瘘管率、长期导管率、标准化住院率、标准化输血率、透析充分性和中心血液透析消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统患者体验评分。局限性:包括社会风险因素在内的未观察到的混杂因素限制了进行因果推断的能力。结论与相关性:商业医疗保险患者比例越高的医疗机构在标准化死亡率方面表现越好。如果这种关联反映了一种因果关系,那么从商业健康保险到医疗保险的覆盖范围的增加可能会对透析设施的护理质量产生不利影响。美国最高法院最近的一项裁决可能导致接受透析的美国患者从商业健康保险转向医疗保险。我们的目的是确定商业支付者在透析设施支付者组合中所占比例的差异是否会影响透析设施的护理质量。在对2019年透析设施质量评级的分析中,更多的商业保险与标准化死亡率的更好表现相关,但与其他关键透析设施质量指标无关。这一发现表明,覆盖范围从商业健康保险转移到医疗保险可能会对美国透析设施的护理质量产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commercial Health Insurance and Quality of Care in US Dialysis Facilities

Rationale & Objective

Commercial health insurance typically reimburses at a higher rate for dialysis than Medicare. A recent ruling by the US Supreme Court could result in many commercially insured patients who receive dialysis forgoing their private health insurance and shifting to Medicare as the primary payer. Our objective was to determine whether differences in commercial payers as a proportion of payer mix affect the quality of care at dialysis facilities.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting & Population

We examined US patients receiving dialysis from US Dialysis Facility Reports and the Dialysis Facility Compare websites in 2019.

Exposures

Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients with commercial health insurance.

Outcomes

Seven key dialysis facility quality metrics included in Dialysis Facility Compare star ratings.

Analytical Approach

Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for observed confounders.

Results

Among 7,194 US dialysis facilities, an average of 4.4% of prevalent dialysis patients had commercial insurance. Each 10% absolute increase in the percentage of dialysis patients in a facility with commercial insurance was associated with an adjusted 8.3% (3.0%-13.6%) lower standardized mortality ratio. Commercial health insurance was not significantly associated with the remaining quality metrics examined, including standardized fistula rate, long-term catheter rate, standardized hospitalization ratio, standardized transfusion ratio, dialysis adequacy, and In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient experience score.

Limitations

The potential for unobserved confounders including social risk factors limits the ability to make causal inferences.

Conclusions and Relevance

Dialysis facilities with a higher percentage of patients with commercial health insurance had better performance in standardized mortality ratio. If this association reflects a causal connection, then increased shifting of coverage from commercial health insurance to Medicare could adversely affect the quality of care at dialysis facilities.

Plain Language Summary

A recent US Supreme Court decision may lead US patients receiving dialysis to shift from commercial health insurance to Medicare. Our objective was to determine whether differences in commercial payers as a proportion of dialysis facility payer mix affect the quality of care at dialysis facilities. In an analysis of dialysis facility quality ratings from 2019, more commercial insurance was associated with better performance in standardized mortality ratio but not with other key dialysis facility quality measures. This finding suggests that the shifting of coverage from commercial health insurance to Medicare could adversely affect quality of care at US dialysis facilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信