选择正确的治疗退行性脊髓型颈椎病

Q2 Medicine
Jong-Beom Park , Gun Woo Lee
{"title":"选择正确的治疗退行性脊髓型颈椎病","authors":"Jong-Beom Park ,&nbsp;Gun Woo Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive degenerative disorder of the spinal cord that can lead to significant and irreversible neurological deficits if left untreated. Determining the most appropriate treatment strategy requires a thorough assessment of disease severity, patient-specific factors, and comparative benefits of surgical versus non-surgical interventions.</div><div>Conservative treatment, including physical therapy, pharmacological treatment, and lifestyle modifications, might be considered for patients with mild symptoms and those deemed unsuitable for surgery. However, for cases with moderate to severe myelopathy or progressive neurological deterioration, surgical treatment remains the gold standard. Surgical options—including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), laminoplasty, and laminectomy with or without fusion—should be selected based on the pattern of spinal cord compression, sagittal alignment, and patient comorbidities. ACDF and ACCF are preferred for focal anterior compression at limited levels, whereas laminoplasty is generally indicated for multilevel posterior compression in patients with preserved cervical lordosis. For cases with cervical kyphosis or significant instability, laminectomy with fusion is often required. In certain complex cases, a combined anterior-posterior approach may be necessary to achieve adequate decompression, restore spinal alignment, and enhance stability, particularly in patients with severe deformities or multilevel involvement.</div><div>Recent advances in minimally invasive spine surgery and motion-preserving techniques, such as cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), have broadened the spectrum of treatment options, offering potential benefits for reducing perioperative morbidity and preserving segmental motion. Additionally, acute spinal cord injury due to trauma in a spondylotic spine, particularly central cord syndrome (CCS), represents a critical consideration in treatment planning. The role of anterior versus posterior surgery, including the rationale for decision-making, has been expanded to highlight key factors such as sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, and spinal alignment. Moreover, we discuss the role of laminectomy without fusion in DCM management, evaluating its indications and limitations. Decision-making must carefully weigh patient-reported outcomes, complication risks, and long-term functional prognosis. This review provides an expert synthesis of current evidence and guidelines for DCM treatment, integrating the latest surgical innovations and a patient-centered approach to optimize clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 103014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing the right treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy\",\"authors\":\"Jong-Beom Park ,&nbsp;Gun Woo Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive degenerative disorder of the spinal cord that can lead to significant and irreversible neurological deficits if left untreated. Determining the most appropriate treatment strategy requires a thorough assessment of disease severity, patient-specific factors, and comparative benefits of surgical versus non-surgical interventions.</div><div>Conservative treatment, including physical therapy, pharmacological treatment, and lifestyle modifications, might be considered for patients with mild symptoms and those deemed unsuitable for surgery. However, for cases with moderate to severe myelopathy or progressive neurological deterioration, surgical treatment remains the gold standard. Surgical options—including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), laminoplasty, and laminectomy with or without fusion—should be selected based on the pattern of spinal cord compression, sagittal alignment, and patient comorbidities. ACDF and ACCF are preferred for focal anterior compression at limited levels, whereas laminoplasty is generally indicated for multilevel posterior compression in patients with preserved cervical lordosis. For cases with cervical kyphosis or significant instability, laminectomy with fusion is often required. In certain complex cases, a combined anterior-posterior approach may be necessary to achieve adequate decompression, restore spinal alignment, and enhance stability, particularly in patients with severe deformities or multilevel involvement.</div><div>Recent advances in minimally invasive spine surgery and motion-preserving techniques, such as cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), have broadened the spectrum of treatment options, offering potential benefits for reducing perioperative morbidity and preserving segmental motion. Additionally, acute spinal cord injury due to trauma in a spondylotic spine, particularly central cord syndrome (CCS), represents a critical consideration in treatment planning. The role of anterior versus posterior surgery, including the rationale for decision-making, has been expanded to highlight key factors such as sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, and spinal alignment. Moreover, we discuss the role of laminectomy without fusion in DCM management, evaluating its indications and limitations. Decision-making must carefully weigh patient-reported outcomes, complication risks, and long-term functional prognosis. This review provides an expert synthesis of current evidence and guidelines for DCM treatment, integrating the latest surgical innovations and a patient-centered approach to optimize clinical outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

退行性颈脊髓病(DCM)是一种进行性脊髓退行性疾病,如果不及时治疗,可导致严重和不可逆转的神经功能缺损。确定最合适的治疗策略需要对疾病严重程度、患者特异性因素以及手术与非手术干预的比较效益进行全面评估。对于症状轻微和不适合手术的患者,可考虑采用保守治疗,包括物理治疗、药物治疗和改变生活方式。然而,对于中度至重度脊髓病或进行性神经恶化的病例,手术治疗仍然是金标准。手术选择——包括前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)、前路颈椎椎体切除术和融合术(ACCF)、椎板成形术、椎板切除术伴或不伴融合术——应根据脊髓受压、矢状位对齐和患者合并症的模式来选择。ACDF和ACCF适用于有限水平的局灶前压迫,而椎板成形术通常适用于保留颈椎前凸的患者的多水平后压迫。对于颈椎后凸或明显不稳定的病例,通常需要椎板切除术合并融合。在某些复杂的病例中,可能需要前后联合入路来实现充分的减压,恢复脊柱对齐,并增强稳定性,特别是在严重畸形或多节段受累的患者中。微创脊柱手术和运动保持技术的最新进展,如颈椎间盘置换术(CDA),拓宽了治疗选择的范围,为减少围手术期发病率和保持节段性运动提供了潜在的好处。此外,由于脊柱裂症的创伤引起的急性脊髓损伤,特别是中央脊髓综合征(CCS),在治疗计划中是一个重要的考虑因素。前路与后路手术的作用,包括决策的基本原理,已经扩展到突出关键因素,如矢状垂直轴、T1斜率和脊柱对齐。此外,我们还讨论了无融合椎板切除术在DCM治疗中的作用,评估其适应症和局限性。决策必须仔细权衡患者报告的结果、并发症风险和长期功能预后。本文综述了目前DCM治疗的证据和指南,整合了最新的外科创新和以患者为中心的方法来优化临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choosing the right treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive degenerative disorder of the spinal cord that can lead to significant and irreversible neurological deficits if left untreated. Determining the most appropriate treatment strategy requires a thorough assessment of disease severity, patient-specific factors, and comparative benefits of surgical versus non-surgical interventions.
Conservative treatment, including physical therapy, pharmacological treatment, and lifestyle modifications, might be considered for patients with mild symptoms and those deemed unsuitable for surgery. However, for cases with moderate to severe myelopathy or progressive neurological deterioration, surgical treatment remains the gold standard. Surgical options—including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), laminoplasty, and laminectomy with or without fusion—should be selected based on the pattern of spinal cord compression, sagittal alignment, and patient comorbidities. ACDF and ACCF are preferred for focal anterior compression at limited levels, whereas laminoplasty is generally indicated for multilevel posterior compression in patients with preserved cervical lordosis. For cases with cervical kyphosis or significant instability, laminectomy with fusion is often required. In certain complex cases, a combined anterior-posterior approach may be necessary to achieve adequate decompression, restore spinal alignment, and enhance stability, particularly in patients with severe deformities or multilevel involvement.
Recent advances in minimally invasive spine surgery and motion-preserving techniques, such as cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), have broadened the spectrum of treatment options, offering potential benefits for reducing perioperative morbidity and preserving segmental motion. Additionally, acute spinal cord injury due to trauma in a spondylotic spine, particularly central cord syndrome (CCS), represents a critical consideration in treatment planning. The role of anterior versus posterior surgery, including the rationale for decision-making, has been expanded to highlight key factors such as sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, and spinal alignment. Moreover, we discuss the role of laminectomy without fusion in DCM management, evaluating its indications and limitations. Decision-making must carefully weigh patient-reported outcomes, complication risks, and long-term functional prognosis. This review provides an expert synthesis of current evidence and guidelines for DCM treatment, integrating the latest surgical innovations and a patient-centered approach to optimize clinical outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信