调整拉伸强度对健康成人活动范围和被动僵硬的急性影响:一项随机交叉试验

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Taizan Fukaya , Shingo Matsuo , Manabu Miyazaki , Masahiro Iwata , Genki Hatano , Eiji Yamanaka , Wakako Tsuchida , Yuji Asai , Shigeyuki Suzuki
{"title":"调整拉伸强度对健康成人活动范围和被动僵硬的急性影响:一项随机交叉试验","authors":"Taizan Fukaya ,&nbsp;Shingo Matsuo ,&nbsp;Manabu Miyazaki ,&nbsp;Masahiro Iwata ,&nbsp;Genki Hatano ,&nbsp;Eiji Yamanaka ,&nbsp;Wakako Tsuchida ,&nbsp;Yuji Asai ,&nbsp;Shigeyuki Suzuki","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.04.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Static stretching, a common method used to improve flexibility, has traditionally involved repeated stretching until reaching the initial or pre-determined stretching angle or torque. However, recent recommendations suggest that stretching until reaching a new maximal angle may offer greater benefits owing to increased stretching intensity. This study aimed to examine the acute effects of resetting the static stretching intensity on flexibility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized crossover trial, 14 healthy participants performed 300-s of static stretching of the right hamstrings randomly under two conditions: resetting the stretching intensity at new maximal knee extension angles every 30 s (10 × 30-s) or no-resetting (1 × 300-s). The outcomes assessed included range of motion (ROM), passive torque (PT) at pain onset, passive stiffness before and after stretching, and stretching angle during stretching.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the 10 × 30-s condition, stretching angle was increased gradually (p &lt; 0.05). Significant improvements were observed in ROM, PT at pain onset, and passive stiffness (p &lt; 0.05) after stretching under both conditions. Moreover, the relative improvement in these parameters was greater under the 10 × 30-s condition than under the 1 × 300-s condition (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that resetting stretching intensity can enhance flexibility, possibly due to the increased stretching intensity, underscoring the importance of individualized stretching approaches to optimize flexibility outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"43 ","pages":"Pages 42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute effects of resetting the stretching intensity on range of motion and passive stiffness in healthy adults: A randomized crossover trial\",\"authors\":\"Taizan Fukaya ,&nbsp;Shingo Matsuo ,&nbsp;Manabu Miyazaki ,&nbsp;Masahiro Iwata ,&nbsp;Genki Hatano ,&nbsp;Eiji Yamanaka ,&nbsp;Wakako Tsuchida ,&nbsp;Yuji Asai ,&nbsp;Shigeyuki Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.04.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Static stretching, a common method used to improve flexibility, has traditionally involved repeated stretching until reaching the initial or pre-determined stretching angle or torque. However, recent recommendations suggest that stretching until reaching a new maximal angle may offer greater benefits owing to increased stretching intensity. This study aimed to examine the acute effects of resetting the static stretching intensity on flexibility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized crossover trial, 14 healthy participants performed 300-s of static stretching of the right hamstrings randomly under two conditions: resetting the stretching intensity at new maximal knee extension angles every 30 s (10 × 30-s) or no-resetting (1 × 300-s). The outcomes assessed included range of motion (ROM), passive torque (PT) at pain onset, passive stiffness before and after stretching, and stretching angle during stretching.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the 10 × 30-s condition, stretching angle was increased gradually (p &lt; 0.05). Significant improvements were observed in ROM, PT at pain onset, and passive stiffness (p &lt; 0.05) after stretching under both conditions. Moreover, the relative improvement in these parameters was greater under the 10 × 30-s condition than under the 1 × 300-s condition (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that resetting stretching intensity can enhance flexibility, possibly due to the increased stretching intensity, underscoring the importance of individualized stretching approaches to optimize flexibility outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 42-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225001329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225001329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静态拉伸是一种常用的提高柔韧性的方法,传统上需要反复拉伸,直到达到初始或预先确定的拉伸角度或扭矩。然而,最近的建议表明,拉伸直到达到一个新的最大角度可能会提供更大的好处,因为增加拉伸强度。本研究旨在探讨重置静态拉伸强度对柔韧性的急性影响。方法在随机交叉试验中,14名健康受试者在两种条件下随机进行300秒的右腿筋静态拉伸:每30秒以新的最大膝关节伸展角度重置拉伸强度(10 × 30-s)或不重置(1 × 300-s)。评估的结果包括活动范围(ROM)、疼痛发作时的被动扭矩(PT)、拉伸前后的被动刚度以及拉伸时的拉伸角度。结果在10 × 30-s条件下,拉伸角度逐渐增大(p <;0.05)。在ROM、疼痛发作时的PT和被动僵硬(p <;0.05)。而且,10 × 30-s条件下这些参数的相对改善大于1 × 300-s条件下(p <;0.05)。结论这些研究结果表明,调整拉伸强度可以增强柔韧性,这可能是由于拉伸强度的增加,强调了个性化拉伸方法对优化柔韧性结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute effects of resetting the stretching intensity on range of motion and passive stiffness in healthy adults: A randomized crossover trial

Introduction

Static stretching, a common method used to improve flexibility, has traditionally involved repeated stretching until reaching the initial or pre-determined stretching angle or torque. However, recent recommendations suggest that stretching until reaching a new maximal angle may offer greater benefits owing to increased stretching intensity. This study aimed to examine the acute effects of resetting the static stretching intensity on flexibility.

Methods

In this randomized crossover trial, 14 healthy participants performed 300-s of static stretching of the right hamstrings randomly under two conditions: resetting the stretching intensity at new maximal knee extension angles every 30 s (10 × 30-s) or no-resetting (1 × 300-s). The outcomes assessed included range of motion (ROM), passive torque (PT) at pain onset, passive stiffness before and after stretching, and stretching angle during stretching.

Results

During the 10 × 30-s condition, stretching angle was increased gradually (p < 0.05). Significant improvements were observed in ROM, PT at pain onset, and passive stiffness (p < 0.05) after stretching under both conditions. Moreover, the relative improvement in these parameters was greater under the 10 × 30-s condition than under the 1 × 300-s condition (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that resetting stretching intensity can enhance flexibility, possibly due to the increased stretching intensity, underscoring the importance of individualized stretching approaches to optimize flexibility outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信