左心室辅助装置植入时二尖瓣返流:是否应该治疗?

Hiroki Kohno MD, PhD , Goro Matsumiya MD, PhD , Yoshikatsu Saiki MD, PhD , Koichiro Kinugawa MD, PhD , Minoru Ono MD, PhD
{"title":"左心室辅助装置植入时二尖瓣返流:是否应该治疗?","authors":"Hiroki Kohno MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Goro Matsumiya MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoshikatsu Saiki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Koichiro Kinugawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Minoru Ono MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Mitral regurgitation may persist or progress after left ventricular assist device implantation. However, whether preexisting mitral regurgitation should be corrected at the time of implantation remains to be determined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective, registry-based analysis was performed on 1398 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients who underwent implantation between 2010 and 2022. Patients were compared for significant mitral regurgitation, defined as moderate-to-severe or greater mitral regurgitation after implantation, and major adverse events during left ventricular assist device support. Comparisons were made between patients untreated for mitral regurgitation but who had moderate or greater preexisting mitral regurgitation (n = 414) and those who had no or mild preexisting mitral regurgitation (n = 368) (cohort 1), and between patients with moderate or greater mitral regurgitation who underwent concomitant mitral valve surgery (n = 86) and those who did not (n = 414) (cohort 2).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cumulative incidence of significant mitral regurgitation was higher in patients with untreated moderate or greater mitral regurgitation in both cohorts (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 and <em>P</em> = .025, cohorts 1 and 2, respectively). However, the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality and readmission, and the risk of other major left ventricular assist device complications such as stroke and right heart failure were comparable between groups in both cohorts. The results were also consistent for the propensity score–matched population created in each cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant mitral regurgitation may be prevented by concomitant surgery, but late survival and the risk of other major adverse events were not significantly improved by the procedure and were similar between patients with untreated moderate or greater mitral regurgitation and those with no or untreated mild mitral regurgitation. Our results suggest that mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation may have only limited benefits from concomitant surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 96-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitral regurgitation at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation: Should it be treated or not?\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Kohno MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Goro Matsumiya MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoshikatsu Saiki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Koichiro Kinugawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Minoru Ono MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Mitral regurgitation may persist or progress after left ventricular assist device implantation. However, whether preexisting mitral regurgitation should be corrected at the time of implantation remains to be determined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective, registry-based analysis was performed on 1398 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients who underwent implantation between 2010 and 2022. Patients were compared for significant mitral regurgitation, defined as moderate-to-severe or greater mitral regurgitation after implantation, and major adverse events during left ventricular assist device support. Comparisons were made between patients untreated for mitral regurgitation but who had moderate or greater preexisting mitral regurgitation (n = 414) and those who had no or mild preexisting mitral regurgitation (n = 368) (cohort 1), and between patients with moderate or greater mitral regurgitation who underwent concomitant mitral valve surgery (n = 86) and those who did not (n = 414) (cohort 2).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cumulative incidence of significant mitral regurgitation was higher in patients with untreated moderate or greater mitral regurgitation in both cohorts (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 and <em>P</em> = .025, cohorts 1 and 2, respectively). However, the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality and readmission, and the risk of other major left ventricular assist device complications such as stroke and right heart failure were comparable between groups in both cohorts. The results were also consistent for the propensity score–matched population created in each cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant mitral regurgitation may be prevented by concomitant surgery, but late survival and the risk of other major adverse events were not significantly improved by the procedure and were similar between patients with untreated moderate or greater mitral regurgitation and those with no or untreated mild mitral regurgitation. Our results suggest that mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation may have only limited benefits from concomitant surgery.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS open\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 96-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266627362500049X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266627362500049X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的左心室辅助装置植入后二尖瓣反流可能持续或恶化。然而,是否应该在植入时纠正先前存在的二尖瓣反流仍有待确定。方法回顾性分析2010年至2022年间1398例接受连续血流左室辅助装置植入的患者。比较患者的明显二尖瓣反流,定义为植入后中度至重度或更严重的二尖瓣反流,以及左心室辅助装置支持期间的主要不良事件。比较未接受二尖瓣反流治疗但有中度或更严重二尖瓣反流的患者(n = 414)和没有或轻度二尖瓣反流的患者(n = 368)(队列1)。同时接受二尖瓣手术的中度或重度二尖瓣反流患者(n = 86)和未接受二尖瓣手术的患者(n = 414)(队列2)。结果在两组患者中,未经治疗的中度或重度二尖瓣反流患者显著二尖瓣反流的累积发生率均较高(P <;0.001和P = 0.025,分别为队列1和2)。然而,在两个队列中,全因死亡率和再入院的累积发生率,以及其他主要左心室辅助装置并发症(如中风和右心衰)的风险在两组之间是可比的。在每个队列中创建的倾向评分匹配人群的结果也是一致的。结论合并二尖瓣反流可以预防严重的二尖瓣反流,但合并二尖瓣反流的患者晚期生存和其他主要不良事件的风险并没有显著提高,而且未经治疗的中度或重度二尖瓣反流患者与没有或未经治疗的轻度二尖瓣反流患者的生存率和其他主要不良事件的风险相似。我们的研究结果表明,在左心室辅助装置植入期间二尖瓣反流可能只有有限的好处,从伴随手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mitral regurgitation at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation: Should it be treated or not?

Objective

Mitral regurgitation may persist or progress after left ventricular assist device implantation. However, whether preexisting mitral regurgitation should be corrected at the time of implantation remains to be determined.

Methods

A retrospective, registry-based analysis was performed on 1398 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients who underwent implantation between 2010 and 2022. Patients were compared for significant mitral regurgitation, defined as moderate-to-severe or greater mitral regurgitation after implantation, and major adverse events during left ventricular assist device support. Comparisons were made between patients untreated for mitral regurgitation but who had moderate or greater preexisting mitral regurgitation (n = 414) and those who had no or mild preexisting mitral regurgitation (n = 368) (cohort 1), and between patients with moderate or greater mitral regurgitation who underwent concomitant mitral valve surgery (n = 86) and those who did not (n = 414) (cohort 2).

Results

The cumulative incidence of significant mitral regurgitation was higher in patients with untreated moderate or greater mitral regurgitation in both cohorts (P < .001 and P = .025, cohorts 1 and 2, respectively). However, the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality and readmission, and the risk of other major left ventricular assist device complications such as stroke and right heart failure were comparable between groups in both cohorts. The results were also consistent for the propensity score–matched population created in each cohort.

Conclusions

Significant mitral regurgitation may be prevented by concomitant surgery, but late survival and the risk of other major adverse events were not significantly improved by the procedure and were similar between patients with untreated moderate or greater mitral regurgitation and those with no or untreated mild mitral regurgitation. Our results suggest that mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation may have only limited benefits from concomitant surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信