接受手术的年轻肺癌患者:年龄小于 50 岁与大于 50 岁患者的临床病理特征和预后比较

Rachel T. Leo BA, Evert A. Sugarbaker BS, Miles McAllister BA, Anupama Singh MD, Rafael R. Barcelos MD, Ali Basil Ali MD, Raphael Bueno MD, Michael T. Jaklitsch MD, Paula Ugalde Figueroa MD, Scott J. Swanson MD
{"title":"接受手术的年轻肺癌患者:年龄小于 50 岁与大于 50 岁患者的临床病理特征和预后比较","authors":"Rachel T. Leo BA,&nbsp;Evert A. Sugarbaker BS,&nbsp;Miles McAllister BA,&nbsp;Anupama Singh MD,&nbsp;Rafael R. Barcelos MD,&nbsp;Ali Basil Ali MD,&nbsp;Raphael Bueno MD,&nbsp;Michael T. Jaklitsch MD,&nbsp;Paula Ugalde Figueroa MD,&nbsp;Scott J. Swanson MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We investigated clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival of young surgical patients with non–small cell lung cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective review of an institutional database of patients aged 50 years or younger undergoing resection for non–small cell lung cancer between January 1995 and March 2022. A control group of patients older than age 50 years was selected by stratified random sampling. Relevant characteristics were compared with Wilcoxon rank sum,χ,<sup>2</sup> and Fisher exact tests. Propensity-score weighting was used to control for confounders. OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 196 patients aged 50 years or younger and 232 patients older than age 50 years. Median age was 46 years (interquartile range, 43-49 years) in the younger group and 69 years (interquartile range, 63-74 years) in the older group. Younger patients were more often women, non-White, and with fewer comorbidities. They more often presented with symptoms, stage III or IV disease, and more often received neoadjuvant therapy. In unweighted analysis, younger patients showed superior OS (log-rank <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). After propensity score weighting for procedure type, histologic type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and smoking status, there was no significant difference in OS at 5 years between younger and older groups (70.62% vs 72.99%; weighted log-rank <em>P</em> = .084). Younger patients showed superior OS (weighted log-rank <em>P</em> = .0006) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (weighted log-rank <em>P</em> = .017) for clinical stage I, but not any other stage. lymphovascular invasion was an independent risk factor for worsened OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival across ages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recognizing lung cancer as a differential diagnosis for patients aged 50 years or younger is crucial because this group shows superior outcomes for stage I disease. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic risk factor across age groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 409-422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young lung cancer patients undergoing surgery: Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in patients aged ≤50 years versus >50 years\",\"authors\":\"Rachel T. Leo BA,&nbsp;Evert A. Sugarbaker BS,&nbsp;Miles McAllister BA,&nbsp;Anupama Singh MD,&nbsp;Rafael R. Barcelos MD,&nbsp;Ali Basil Ali MD,&nbsp;Raphael Bueno MD,&nbsp;Michael T. Jaklitsch MD,&nbsp;Paula Ugalde Figueroa MD,&nbsp;Scott J. Swanson MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We investigated clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival of young surgical patients with non–small cell lung cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective review of an institutional database of patients aged 50 years or younger undergoing resection for non–small cell lung cancer between January 1995 and March 2022. A control group of patients older than age 50 years was selected by stratified random sampling. Relevant characteristics were compared with Wilcoxon rank sum,χ,<sup>2</sup> and Fisher exact tests. Propensity-score weighting was used to control for confounders. OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 196 patients aged 50 years or younger and 232 patients older than age 50 years. Median age was 46 years (interquartile range, 43-49 years) in the younger group and 69 years (interquartile range, 63-74 years) in the older group. Younger patients were more often women, non-White, and with fewer comorbidities. They more often presented with symptoms, stage III or IV disease, and more often received neoadjuvant therapy. In unweighted analysis, younger patients showed superior OS (log-rank <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). After propensity score weighting for procedure type, histologic type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and smoking status, there was no significant difference in OS at 5 years between younger and older groups (70.62% vs 72.99%; weighted log-rank <em>P</em> = .084). Younger patients showed superior OS (weighted log-rank <em>P</em> = .0006) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (weighted log-rank <em>P</em> = .017) for clinical stage I, but not any other stage. lymphovascular invasion was an independent risk factor for worsened OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival across ages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recognizing lung cancer as a differential diagnosis for patients aged 50 years or younger is crucial because this group shows superior outcomes for stage I disease. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic risk factor across age groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS open\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 409-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624004443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624004443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨年轻非小细胞肺癌手术患者的临床病理特征、总生存期(OS)和局部无复发生存率。方法回顾性分析1995年1月至2022年3月间接受非小细胞肺癌切除术的50岁及以下患者的机构数据库。采用分层随机抽样的方法选取年龄大于50岁的患者作为对照组。相关特征采用Wilcoxon秩和、χ 2和Fisher精确检验进行比较。倾向得分加权用于控制混杂因素。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险回归分析OS和局部无复发生存率。结果196例患者年龄在50岁以下,232例患者年龄在50岁以上。年轻组的中位年龄为46岁(43-49岁),老年组的中位年龄为69岁(63-74岁)。年轻患者多为女性,非白人,合并症较少。他们更常出现症状,III期或IV期疾病,更常接受新辅助治疗。在非加权分析中,年轻患者表现出更好的OS (log-rank P <;。)。在对手术类型、组织学类型、Charlson共病指数和吸烟状况进行倾向评分加权后,年轻组和老年组5岁时的OS无显著差异(70.62% vs 72.99%;加权log-rank P = .084)。年轻患者在临床I期表现出更好的OS(加权log-rank P = .0006)和局部无复发生存率(加权log-rank P = .017),但在其他任何阶段则没有。淋巴血管侵袭是各年龄段OS恶化和局部无复发生存的独立危险因素。结论:认识到50岁及以下患者的肺癌鉴别诊断是至关重要的,因为该组在I期疾病中表现出更好的预后。淋巴血管侵袭是各年龄组独立的预后危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Young lung cancer patients undergoing surgery: Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in patients aged ≤50 years versus >50 years

Young lung cancer patients undergoing surgery: Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in patients aged ≤50 years versus >50 years

Objective

We investigated clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival of young surgical patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

Methods

Retrospective review of an institutional database of patients aged 50 years or younger undergoing resection for non–small cell lung cancer between January 1995 and March 2022. A control group of patients older than age 50 years was selected by stratified random sampling. Relevant characteristics were compared with Wilcoxon rank sum,χ,2 and Fisher exact tests. Propensity-score weighting was used to control for confounders. OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

We identified 196 patients aged 50 years or younger and 232 patients older than age 50 years. Median age was 46 years (interquartile range, 43-49 years) in the younger group and 69 years (interquartile range, 63-74 years) in the older group. Younger patients were more often women, non-White, and with fewer comorbidities. They more often presented with symptoms, stage III or IV disease, and more often received neoadjuvant therapy. In unweighted analysis, younger patients showed superior OS (log-rank P < .0001). After propensity score weighting for procedure type, histologic type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and smoking status, there was no significant difference in OS at 5 years between younger and older groups (70.62% vs 72.99%; weighted log-rank P = .084). Younger patients showed superior OS (weighted log-rank P = .0006) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (weighted log-rank P = .017) for clinical stage I, but not any other stage. lymphovascular invasion was an independent risk factor for worsened OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival across ages.

Conclusions

Recognizing lung cancer as a differential diagnosis for patients aged 50 years or younger is crucial because this group shows superior outcomes for stage I disease. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic risk factor across age groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信