基于Hodges模型和阈值概念的住宅和社区护理中剥夺自由保障的概念映射

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Peter Jones
{"title":"基于Hodges模型和阈值概念的住宅和社区护理中剥夺自由保障的概念映射","authors":"Peter Jones","doi":"10.1111/jep.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>This article combines recent work on a generic model of care called ‘Hodges' Health Career—Care Domains—Model’ and the threshold concepts framework, with the issue of deprivation of liberty Safeguards. Created within higher education for health and social care, Hodges' model is used relationally with a practice-based emphasis to explore the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in residential care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The context is long-term care for people living with learning disability, dementia and chronic physical health problems. That is, people unable to live in their own home (even with support) who are cared for in residential, and nursing homes and specialised/intensive care units. Hodges' model, which can also be described as a conceptual framework, is combined with threshold concepts to illustrate how deprivation of liberty safeguards can be integrated in theory and practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study is descriptive and draws on the author's experience as a community mental health nurse for older adults and nursing home liaison. The emphasis is practice-based, adopting a conceptual mapping approach supported by discussion and literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Resources are provided and avenues for further and ongoing study are also given in conclusion.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Conceptual Mapping Exercise of Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in Residential & Community Care Using Hodges' Model and Threshold Concepts\",\"authors\":\"Peter Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>This article combines recent work on a generic model of care called ‘Hodges' Health Career—Care Domains—Model’ and the threshold concepts framework, with the issue of deprivation of liberty Safeguards. Created within higher education for health and social care, Hodges' model is used relationally with a practice-based emphasis to explore the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in residential care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The context is long-term care for people living with learning disability, dementia and chronic physical health problems. That is, people unable to live in their own home (even with support) who are cared for in residential, and nursing homes and specialised/intensive care units. Hodges' model, which can also be described as a conceptual framework, is combined with threshold concepts to illustrate how deprivation of liberty safeguards can be integrated in theory and practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study is descriptive and draws on the author's experience as a community mental health nurse for older adults and nursing home liaison. The emphasis is practice-based, adopting a conceptual mapping approach supported by discussion and literature.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Resources are provided and avenues for further and ongoing study are also given in conclusion.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理论依据 本文结合了最近在 "霍奇斯健康职业-护理领域-模型 "通用护理模型和阈值概念框架方面的工作,探讨了剥夺自由的保障措施问题。霍奇斯模式是在健康和社会护理高等教育中创立的,它以实践为基础,以关系为重点,用于探讨寄宿护理中的剥夺自由保障措施。 目的和目标 为有学习障碍、痴呆症和慢性身体健康问题的人提供长期护理。也就是说,无法在自己家中生活(即使有支持)的人需要在养老院、护理院和特殊/重症监护病房接受护理。霍奇斯模式也可以说是一个概念框架,它与阈值概念相结合,说明了如何将剥夺自由的保障措施融入理论和实践中。 研究方法 本研究是描述性的,借鉴了作者作为社区老年人心理健康护士和疗养院联络员的经验。重点是以实践为基础,采用以讨论和文献为支持的概念图法。 结论 提供了相关资源,并在结论中提出了进一步持续研究的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Conceptual Mapping Exercise of Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in Residential & Community Care Using Hodges' Model and Threshold Concepts

Rationale

This article combines recent work on a generic model of care called ‘Hodges' Health Career—Care Domains—Model’ and the threshold concepts framework, with the issue of deprivation of liberty Safeguards. Created within higher education for health and social care, Hodges' model is used relationally with a practice-based emphasis to explore the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in residential care.

Aims and Objectives

The context is long-term care for people living with learning disability, dementia and chronic physical health problems. That is, people unable to live in their own home (even with support) who are cared for in residential, and nursing homes and specialised/intensive care units. Hodges' model, which can also be described as a conceptual framework, is combined with threshold concepts to illustrate how deprivation of liberty safeguards can be integrated in theory and practice.

Methods

The study is descriptive and draws on the author's experience as a community mental health nurse for older adults and nursing home liaison. The emphasis is practice-based, adopting a conceptual mapping approach supported by discussion and literature.

Conclusion

Resources are provided and avenues for further and ongoing study are also given in conclusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信