在允许对流的尺度上,区域和全球数据集在孟加拉湾地区强热带气旋模拟中的作用

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Thatiparthi Koteshwaramma, Kuvar Satya Singh
{"title":"在允许对流的尺度上,区域和全球数据集在孟加拉湾地区强热带气旋模拟中的作用","authors":"Thatiparthi Koteshwaramma,&nbsp;Kuvar Satya Singh","doi":"10.1002/met.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The efficacy of global and regional datasets on the prediction of extremely severe cyclonic storms over the Bay of Bengal (BoB) was evaluated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in a double-nested domain with a 4 km finer resolution on three different datasets, namely FNL, ERA-Interim, and Indian Monsoon Data Assimilation and Analysis (IMDAA). The initial cyclonic vortex, the vertical profile of horizontal wind speed, and relative humidity from different datasets were assessed to evaluate the initial structure and validated with IMD best-fit track data. The model results highlight that simulations with FNL data predict tracks and intensities more accurately for the majority of cyclonic storms compared with the IMDAA and ERA-Interim datasets. Simulations with FNL data exhibit the least mean track errors of 70, 126, 121, and 204 km for days 1–4, respectively. Additionally, the mean wind error of five extremely severe cyclonic storms (ESCSs) using FNL data is approximately 9.3, 4.6, 7.7, and 10.9 m/s, respectively, from day 1 to day 4. It is observed that the regional reanalysis of IMDAA datasets outperformed the forecast of several parameters such as maximum surface wind speed, central sea level pressure, and rainfall for the ESCSs <i>Fani</i> and <i>Sidr</i>. The FNL dataset overpredicted the amount of 24-h accumulated rainfall compared with the ERA-Interim and IMDAA datasets, whereas the IMDAA dataset performed better with lower values of root mean square error (148 mm/day), standard deviation (124 mm/day), and higher correlation (0.68) with the TRMM dataset. Model predictions highlight that the regional dataset IMDAA performs better in predicting rainfall magnitude compared with the global dataset due to the added assimilation of numerous local observations. The regional dataset could be improved by exploring large-scale circulation features and their significant role in predicting the track, intensity, and landfall location of the tropical cyclones.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of regional and global datasets in the simulation of intense tropical cyclones over Bay of Bengal region in a convection-permitting scale\",\"authors\":\"Thatiparthi Koteshwaramma,&nbsp;Kuvar Satya Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/met.70044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The efficacy of global and regional datasets on the prediction of extremely severe cyclonic storms over the Bay of Bengal (BoB) was evaluated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in a double-nested domain with a 4 km finer resolution on three different datasets, namely FNL, ERA-Interim, and Indian Monsoon Data Assimilation and Analysis (IMDAA). The initial cyclonic vortex, the vertical profile of horizontal wind speed, and relative humidity from different datasets were assessed to evaluate the initial structure and validated with IMD best-fit track data. The model results highlight that simulations with FNL data predict tracks and intensities more accurately for the majority of cyclonic storms compared with the IMDAA and ERA-Interim datasets. Simulations with FNL data exhibit the least mean track errors of 70, 126, 121, and 204 km for days 1–4, respectively. Additionally, the mean wind error of five extremely severe cyclonic storms (ESCSs) using FNL data is approximately 9.3, 4.6, 7.7, and 10.9 m/s, respectively, from day 1 to day 4. It is observed that the regional reanalysis of IMDAA datasets outperformed the forecast of several parameters such as maximum surface wind speed, central sea level pressure, and rainfall for the ESCSs <i>Fani</i> and <i>Sidr</i>. The FNL dataset overpredicted the amount of 24-h accumulated rainfall compared with the ERA-Interim and IMDAA datasets, whereas the IMDAA dataset performed better with lower values of root mean square error (148 mm/day), standard deviation (124 mm/day), and higher correlation (0.68) with the TRMM dataset. Model predictions highlight that the regional dataset IMDAA performs better in predicting rainfall magnitude compared with the global dataset due to the added assimilation of numerous local observations. The regional dataset could be improved by exploring large-scale circulation features and their significant role in predicting the track, intensity, and landfall location of the tropical cyclones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteorological Applications\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70044\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteorological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.70044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.70044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在FNL、ERA-Interim和印度季风数据同化与分析(IMDAA) 3个不同的数据集上,利用气象研究与预报(WRF)模式在双巢域以4 km精细分辨率评估了全球和区域数据集对孟加拉湾(BoB)极端强烈气旋风暴的预测效果。利用不同数据集的初始气旋涡、水平风速的垂直廓线和相对湿度来评估初始结构,并利用IMD最佳拟合轨迹数据进行验证。模式结果强调,与IMDAA和ERA-Interim数据集相比,FNL数据的模拟对大多数气旋风暴的路径和强度预测更准确。FNL数据模拟显示,1-4天的平均航迹误差最小,分别为70、126、121和204 km。此外,利用FNL资料预报的5次极强气旋风暴(escs)在第1 ~第4天的平均风差分别约为9.3、4.6、7.7和10.9 m/s。结果表明,IMDAA数据集的区域再分析对ESCSs Fani和Sidr的最大地面风速、中央海平面压力和降雨量等参数的预报效果优于区域再分析。与ERA-Interim和IMDAA数据集相比,FNL数据集对24 h累积降雨量的预测过高,而IMDAA数据集的均方根误差(148 mm/d)和标准差(124 mm/d)较低,与TRMM数据集的相关性(0.68)较高。模式预测强调,与全球数据集相比,区域数据集IMDAA在预测降雨量方面表现更好,因为它增加了对大量当地观测数据的同化。通过探索大尺度环流特征及其在预测热带气旋路径、强度和登陆位置中的重要作用,可以改进区域数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Role of regional and global datasets in the simulation of intense tropical cyclones over Bay of Bengal region in a convection-permitting scale

Role of regional and global datasets in the simulation of intense tropical cyclones over Bay of Bengal region in a convection-permitting scale

The efficacy of global and regional datasets on the prediction of extremely severe cyclonic storms over the Bay of Bengal (BoB) was evaluated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in a double-nested domain with a 4 km finer resolution on three different datasets, namely FNL, ERA-Interim, and Indian Monsoon Data Assimilation and Analysis (IMDAA). The initial cyclonic vortex, the vertical profile of horizontal wind speed, and relative humidity from different datasets were assessed to evaluate the initial structure and validated with IMD best-fit track data. The model results highlight that simulations with FNL data predict tracks and intensities more accurately for the majority of cyclonic storms compared with the IMDAA and ERA-Interim datasets. Simulations with FNL data exhibit the least mean track errors of 70, 126, 121, and 204 km for days 1–4, respectively. Additionally, the mean wind error of five extremely severe cyclonic storms (ESCSs) using FNL data is approximately 9.3, 4.6, 7.7, and 10.9 m/s, respectively, from day 1 to day 4. It is observed that the regional reanalysis of IMDAA datasets outperformed the forecast of several parameters such as maximum surface wind speed, central sea level pressure, and rainfall for the ESCSs Fani and Sidr. The FNL dataset overpredicted the amount of 24-h accumulated rainfall compared with the ERA-Interim and IMDAA datasets, whereas the IMDAA dataset performed better with lower values of root mean square error (148 mm/day), standard deviation (124 mm/day), and higher correlation (0.68) with the TRMM dataset. Model predictions highlight that the regional dataset IMDAA performs better in predicting rainfall magnitude compared with the global dataset due to the added assimilation of numerous local observations. The regional dataset could be improved by exploring large-scale circulation features and their significant role in predicting the track, intensity, and landfall location of the tropical cyclones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Meteorological Applications
Meteorological Applications 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Meteorological Applications is to serve the needs of applied meteorologists, forecasters and users of meteorological services by publishing papers on all aspects of meteorological science, including: applications of meteorological, climatological, analytical and forecasting data, and their socio-economic benefits; forecasting, warning and service delivery techniques and methods; weather hazards, their analysis and prediction; performance, verification and value of numerical models and forecasting services; practical applications of ocean and climate models; education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信