超越功效:通过免疫原性评估确保多肽治疗的安全性

IF 1.8 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Koulla Achilleos, Christos Petrou, Vicky Nicolaidou, Yiannis Sarigiannis
{"title":"超越功效:通过免疫原性评估确保多肽治疗的安全性","authors":"Koulla Achilleos,&nbsp;Christos Petrou,&nbsp;Vicky Nicolaidou,&nbsp;Yiannis Sarigiannis","doi":"10.1002/psc.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peptides are gaining remarkable popularity in clinical diagnosis and treatment due to their high selectivity and minimal side effects. Over 11% of all new pharmaceutical chemical entities authorised by the FDA between 2016 and 2024 were synthetically manufactured peptides. A critical factor that can potentially limit the efficacy and safety of peptide-based therapeutics or biologics is immunogenicity, defined as an unintended or adverse immune response to a protein or peptide therapy. This response may be triggered by the peptide itself or by impurities in the production or formulation steps, leading to the production of antidrug antibodies (ADAs). To address this, current regulatory guidelines require the assessment of risks in market authorization applications, which include identifying drug impurity levels and immunogenicity. The development and critical evaluation of appropriate immunogenicity assays is therefore highly warranted. Such assays must consider the fine complexities of the immune response, as well as its variation within the human population. Moreover, immunogenicity testing is expected to remain a priority as the shift toward greener chemistries in peptide synthesis may require reassessment of novel impurities in peptide formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peptide Science","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psc.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Efficacy: Ensuring Safety in Peptide Therapeutics through Immunogenicity Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Koulla Achilleos,&nbsp;Christos Petrou,&nbsp;Vicky Nicolaidou,&nbsp;Yiannis Sarigiannis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psc.70016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Peptides are gaining remarkable popularity in clinical diagnosis and treatment due to their high selectivity and minimal side effects. Over 11% of all new pharmaceutical chemical entities authorised by the FDA between 2016 and 2024 were synthetically manufactured peptides. A critical factor that can potentially limit the efficacy and safety of peptide-based therapeutics or biologics is immunogenicity, defined as an unintended or adverse immune response to a protein or peptide therapy. This response may be triggered by the peptide itself or by impurities in the production or formulation steps, leading to the production of antidrug antibodies (ADAs). To address this, current regulatory guidelines require the assessment of risks in market authorization applications, which include identifying drug impurity levels and immunogenicity. The development and critical evaluation of appropriate immunogenicity assays is therefore highly warranted. Such assays must consider the fine complexities of the immune response, as well as its variation within the human population. Moreover, immunogenicity testing is expected to remain a priority as the shift toward greener chemistries in peptide synthesis may require reassessment of novel impurities in peptide formulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Peptide Science\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psc.70016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Peptide Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psc.70016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peptide Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psc.70016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多肽因其高选择性和副作用小,在临床诊断和治疗中越来越受欢迎。2016年至2024年间,FDA批准的所有新药化学实体中,超过11%是合成制造的多肽。免疫原性是可能限制基于肽的治疗或生物制剂的疗效和安全性的一个关键因素,免疫原性被定义为对蛋白质或肽治疗的意外或不良免疫反应。这种反应可能由肽本身或生产或配方步骤中的杂质触发,导致抗药物抗体(ADAs)的产生。为了解决这个问题,目前的监管指南要求对市场批准申请中的风险进行评估,包括确定药物杂质水平和免疫原性。因此,开发和严格评估适当的免疫原性测定方法是非常必要的。这种检测必须考虑到免疫反应的精细复杂性,以及它在人群中的变化。此外,免疫原性测试预计仍将是一个优先事项,因为肽合成中向绿色化学的转变可能需要重新评估肽制剂中的新杂质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Beyond Efficacy: Ensuring Safety in Peptide Therapeutics through Immunogenicity Assessment

Beyond Efficacy: Ensuring Safety in Peptide Therapeutics through Immunogenicity Assessment

Peptides are gaining remarkable popularity in clinical diagnosis and treatment due to their high selectivity and minimal side effects. Over 11% of all new pharmaceutical chemical entities authorised by the FDA between 2016 and 2024 were synthetically manufactured peptides. A critical factor that can potentially limit the efficacy and safety of peptide-based therapeutics or biologics is immunogenicity, defined as an unintended or adverse immune response to a protein or peptide therapy. This response may be triggered by the peptide itself or by impurities in the production or formulation steps, leading to the production of antidrug antibodies (ADAs). To address this, current regulatory guidelines require the assessment of risks in market authorization applications, which include identifying drug impurity levels and immunogenicity. The development and critical evaluation of appropriate immunogenicity assays is therefore highly warranted. Such assays must consider the fine complexities of the immune response, as well as its variation within the human population. Moreover, immunogenicity testing is expected to remain a priority as the shift toward greener chemistries in peptide synthesis may require reassessment of novel impurities in peptide formulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Peptide Science
Journal of Peptide Science 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
83
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: The official Journal of the European Peptide Society EPS The Journal of Peptide Science is a cooperative venture of John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and the European Peptide Society, undertaken for the advancement of international peptide science by the publication of original research results and reviews. The Journal of Peptide Science publishes three types of articles: Research Articles, Rapid Communications and Reviews. The scope of the Journal embraces the whole range of peptide chemistry and biology: the isolation, characterisation, synthesis properties (chemical, physical, conformational, pharmacological, endocrine and immunological) and applications of natural peptides; studies of their analogues, including peptidomimetics; peptide antibiotics and other peptide-derived complex natural products; peptide and peptide-related drug design and development; peptide materials and nanomaterials science; combinatorial peptide research; the chemical synthesis of proteins; and methodological advances in all these areas. The spectrum of interests is well illustrated by the published proceedings of the regular international Symposia of the European, American, Japanese, Australian, Chinese and Indian Peptide Societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信