Schroth方法和本体感觉神经肌肉促进技术治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的疗效比较:一项随机对照、单盲研究

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Mehmet Hanifi Kaya , Öznur Büyükturan , Buket Büyükturan , Halil Alkan , Fatih Erbahçeci
{"title":"Schroth方法和本体感觉神经肌肉促进技术治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的疗效比较:一项随机对照、单盲研究","authors":"Mehmet Hanifi Kaya ,&nbsp;Öznur Büyükturan ,&nbsp;Buket Büyükturan ,&nbsp;Halil Alkan ,&nbsp;Fatih Erbahçeci","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the Schroth and PNF exercise methods concerning the Cobb angle, trunk rotation angle, quality of life, and aesthetic trunk deformity in adolescents diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employed a randomized, single-blind, 1:1 parallel-group design, involving a total of 67 adolescent patients. Participants were randomly allocated to either the Schroth group or the PNF group. Both groups participated in supervised exercise training sessions three times a week over a six-month period. Baseline and post-treatment assessments were conducted by the same researcher, who remained blinded to group allocations throughout the study. Statistical analysis was conducted using a mixed model for repeated measures ANOVA for each outcome measure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the groups in terms of the Cobb angle, trunk rotation angle (ATR), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) scores, and Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) parameters (p &lt; .001). The mean change scores indicated a statistically greater improvement in favor of the Schroth group across all parameters compared to the PNF group. Statistically significant changes were observed for all parameters within groups (p &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study compared the principles of the Schroth and PNF methods, demonstrating that the Schroth method achieved more favorable outcomes than PNF in the conservative management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. <em>This trial is registered with NCT05227638.</em></div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"43 ","pages":"Pages 35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the efficacy of the Schroth method and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique in adolescent idiopathic Scoliosis: a randomized controlled, single-blinded study\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Hanifi Kaya ,&nbsp;Öznur Büyükturan ,&nbsp;Buket Büyükturan ,&nbsp;Halil Alkan ,&nbsp;Fatih Erbahçeci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the Schroth and PNF exercise methods concerning the Cobb angle, trunk rotation angle, quality of life, and aesthetic trunk deformity in adolescents diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employed a randomized, single-blind, 1:1 parallel-group design, involving a total of 67 adolescent patients. Participants were randomly allocated to either the Schroth group or the PNF group. Both groups participated in supervised exercise training sessions three times a week over a six-month period. Baseline and post-treatment assessments were conducted by the same researcher, who remained blinded to group allocations throughout the study. Statistical analysis was conducted using a mixed model for repeated measures ANOVA for each outcome measure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the groups in terms of the Cobb angle, trunk rotation angle (ATR), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) scores, and Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) parameters (p &lt; .001). The mean change scores indicated a statistically greater improvement in favor of the Schroth group across all parameters compared to the PNF group. Statistically significant changes were observed for all parameters within groups (p &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study compared the principles of the Schroth and PNF methods, demonstrating that the Schroth method achieved more favorable outcomes than PNF in the conservative management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. <em>This trial is registered with NCT05227638.</em></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 35-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922500107X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922500107X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 本研究旨在评估和比较施罗特运动法和PNF运动法对被诊断为特发性脊柱侧凸的青少年在Cobb角、躯干旋转角、生活质量和躯干畸形美学方面的有效性。方法 本研究采用随机、单盲、1:1平行组设计,共有67名青少年患者参与。参与者被随机分配到施罗特组或 PNF 组。在为期六个月的时间里,两组患者都参加了每周三次的督导运动训练课程。基线和治疗后评估由同一研究人员进行,研究人员在整个研究过程中对组别分配保持盲法。统计分析采用重复测量方差分析混合模型进行。结果统计分析显示,在Cobb角、躯干旋转角(ATR)、脊柱侧凸研究协会(SRS)评分和沃尔特里德视觉评估量表(WRVAS)参数方面,组间差异显著(p <.001)。平均变化分数表明,与 PNF 组相比,Schroth 组在所有参数上的改善幅度更大。该研究比较了 Schroth 和 PNF 方法的原理,表明在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的保守治疗中,Schroth 方法比 PNF 方法取得了更有利的结果。该试验已在 NCT05227638 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the efficacy of the Schroth method and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique in adolescent idiopathic Scoliosis: a randomized controlled, single-blinded study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the Schroth and PNF exercise methods concerning the Cobb angle, trunk rotation angle, quality of life, and aesthetic trunk deformity in adolescents diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods

This study employed a randomized, single-blind, 1:1 parallel-group design, involving a total of 67 adolescent patients. Participants were randomly allocated to either the Schroth group or the PNF group. Both groups participated in supervised exercise training sessions three times a week over a six-month period. Baseline and post-treatment assessments were conducted by the same researcher, who remained blinded to group allocations throughout the study. Statistical analysis was conducted using a mixed model for repeated measures ANOVA for each outcome measure.

Results

Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the groups in terms of the Cobb angle, trunk rotation angle (ATR), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) scores, and Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) parameters (p < .001). The mean change scores indicated a statistically greater improvement in favor of the Schroth group across all parameters compared to the PNF group. Statistically significant changes were observed for all parameters within groups (p < .05).

Conclusions

The study compared the principles of the Schroth and PNF methods, demonstrating that the Schroth method achieved more favorable outcomes than PNF in the conservative management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This trial is registered with NCT05227638.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信