Qiongjie Shao , Wei Zhang , Hongjuan Lang , Yan Wang , Han Tang , Juan Du , Ying Liang , Pengyu Jing , Zhongping Gu , Xiaolong Yan , Lei Shang
{"title":"癌症患者报告体验措施的发展和应用:范围综述","authors":"Qiongjie Shao , Wei Zhang , Hongjuan Lang , Yan Wang , Han Tang , Juan Du , Ying Liang , Pengyu Jing , Zhongping Gu , Xiaolong Yan , Lei Shang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examines the currently available Patient-Reported Experience Measures for cancer patients and provides a scoping overview of their definitions, evaluation frameworks, assessment tools, and current applications. The findings aim to inform and guide the development of a patient-centered care model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a combination of subject terms and free-text keywords, studies published by national and international initiatives were reviewed across three online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE) following the PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2216 papers were reviewed, of which 24 were included in the scoping review. From these, 11 Patient-Reported Experience Measures were identified, each from 10 different national projects. Definitions of Patient-Reported Experience Measures were established, and the current status of Patient-Reported Experience Measures evaluation systems for cancer patients, along with their application across four domains, was analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Currently, research on Patient-Reported Experience Measures in cancer patients remains in its early stages, and the effectiveness of several assessment tools has yet to be fully validated. Future studies should focus on developing high-quality, cancer-specific Patient-Reported Experience Measures assessment tools. These tools should be rigorously evaluated and tailored to the unique characteristics of cancer patients' healthcare experiences, with the aim of supporting and enhancing patient-centered care practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and application of patient-reported experience measures for cancer patients: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Qiongjie Shao , Wei Zhang , Hongjuan Lang , Yan Wang , Han Tang , Juan Du , Ying Liang , Pengyu Jing , Zhongping Gu , Xiaolong Yan , Lei Shang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examines the currently available Patient-Reported Experience Measures for cancer patients and provides a scoping overview of their definitions, evaluation frameworks, assessment tools, and current applications. The findings aim to inform and guide the development of a patient-centered care model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a combination of subject terms and free-text keywords, studies published by national and international initiatives were reviewed across three online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE) following the PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2216 papers were reviewed, of which 24 were included in the scoping review. From these, 11 Patient-Reported Experience Measures were identified, each from 10 different national projects. Definitions of Patient-Reported Experience Measures were established, and the current status of Patient-Reported Experience Measures evaluation systems for cancer patients, along with their application across four domains, was analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Currently, research on Patient-Reported Experience Measures in cancer patients remains in its early stages, and the effectiveness of several assessment tools has yet to be fully validated. Future studies should focus on developing high-quality, cancer-specific Patient-Reported Experience Measures assessment tools. These tools should be rigorously evaluated and tailored to the unique characteristics of cancer patients' healthcare experiences, with the aim of supporting and enhancing patient-centered care practices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本研究考察了目前可用的癌症患者报告体验测量方法,并提供了其定义、评估框架、评估工具和当前应用的范围概述。研究结果旨在为以患者为中心的护理模式的发展提供信息和指导。方法采用主题词和自由文本关键词的组合,根据PRISMA指南,在三个在线数据库(PubMed、Web of Science和MEDLINE)中对国家和国际倡议发表的研究进行综述。结果共纳入文献2216篇,其中纳入范围综述24篇。从中确定了11项患者报告体验措施,每项措施来自10个不同的国家项目。建立了患者报告体验措施的定义,并分析了癌症患者患者报告体验措施评估系统的现状及其在四个领域的应用。结论目前,癌症患者报告体验措施的研究尚处于早期阶段,几种评估工具的有效性尚待充分验证。未来的研究应侧重于开发高质量、癌症特异性的患者报告体验测量评估工具。应该严格评估这些工具,并根据癌症患者医疗保健经验的独特特征进行调整,以支持和加强以患者为中心的护理实践。
Development and application of patient-reported experience measures for cancer patients: a scoping review
Objective
This study examines the currently available Patient-Reported Experience Measures for cancer patients and provides a scoping overview of their definitions, evaluation frameworks, assessment tools, and current applications. The findings aim to inform and guide the development of a patient-centered care model.
Methods
Using a combination of subject terms and free-text keywords, studies published by national and international initiatives were reviewed across three online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE) following the PRISMA guidelines.
Results
A total of 2216 papers were reviewed, of which 24 were included in the scoping review. From these, 11 Patient-Reported Experience Measures were identified, each from 10 different national projects. Definitions of Patient-Reported Experience Measures were established, and the current status of Patient-Reported Experience Measures evaluation systems for cancer patients, along with their application across four domains, was analyzed.
Conclusion
Currently, research on Patient-Reported Experience Measures in cancer patients remains in its early stages, and the effectiveness of several assessment tools has yet to be fully validated. Future studies should focus on developing high-quality, cancer-specific Patient-Reported Experience Measures assessment tools. These tools should be rigorously evaluated and tailored to the unique characteristics of cancer patients' healthcare experiences, with the aim of supporting and enhancing patient-centered care practices.