斜坡上离散森林大气顶各向异性反射率模拟

IF 7.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Congcong Zhao;Jianguang Wen;Dongqin You;Yong Tang;Yuan Han;Guokai Liu;Kexin Wei;Huaijing Wang;Qinhuo Liu
{"title":"斜坡上离散森林大气顶各向异性反射率模拟","authors":"Congcong Zhao;Jianguang Wen;Dongqin You;Yong Tang;Yuan Han;Guokai Liu;Kexin Wei;Huaijing Wang;Qinhuo Liu","doi":"10.1109/TGRS.2025.3557557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Characterizing the anisotropic features at the top of atmosphere (TOA) is crucial for vegetation monitoring and retrieval of biophysical parameters. The core challenge lies in modeling the mutual interactions between land surface and atmosphere, particularly in the context of rugged terrains and cloudy conditions. The GOSAILTA is proposed to extend the top-of-canopy (TOC) anisotropic reflectance geometric optical and mutual shadowing and scattering-from-arbitrarily-inclined-leaves model coupled with topography (GOSAILT) model to TOA reflectance/radiance by integrating Santa Barbara DISORT atmospheric radiative transfer (SBDART) model. The interactions between atmosphere and land surface are characterized for the effects of the sloped surface and its surrounding terrains under both clear and cloudy conditions. The model was validated against discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART) simulations, airborne observations from wide-angle infrared dual-model line/area array scanner (WIDAS), and satellite observations from HJ-1A/B constellation charge-coupled device (CCD). Results demonstrate high overall accuracy in the red band (coefficient of determination (<inline-formula> <tex-math>$R^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) =0.993; root-mean-square error (RMSE) =0.008; and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) =5.481%) and near-infrared (NIR) band (<inline-formula> <tex-math>$R^{2}=0.933$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, RMSE =0.025; and MAPE =6.227%) compared to DART simulations. The simulations show strong agreement with WIDAS and HJ, achieving an <inline-formula> <tex-math>$R^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of 0.9. However, the accuracy is slightly lower for top-of-cloud reflectance, with an <inline-formula> <tex-math>$R^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and MAPE of 0.311 and 14.972%, respectively, primarily due to limitations in cloud parameterization.","PeriodicalId":13213,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","volume":"63 ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Top-of-Atmosphere Anisotropic Reflectance of Discrete Forests Over Sloped Surface\",\"authors\":\"Congcong Zhao;Jianguang Wen;Dongqin You;Yong Tang;Yuan Han;Guokai Liu;Kexin Wei;Huaijing Wang;Qinhuo Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TGRS.2025.3557557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Characterizing the anisotropic features at the top of atmosphere (TOA) is crucial for vegetation monitoring and retrieval of biophysical parameters. The core challenge lies in modeling the mutual interactions between land surface and atmosphere, particularly in the context of rugged terrains and cloudy conditions. The GOSAILTA is proposed to extend the top-of-canopy (TOC) anisotropic reflectance geometric optical and mutual shadowing and scattering-from-arbitrarily-inclined-leaves model coupled with topography (GOSAILT) model to TOA reflectance/radiance by integrating Santa Barbara DISORT atmospheric radiative transfer (SBDART) model. The interactions between atmosphere and land surface are characterized for the effects of the sloped surface and its surrounding terrains under both clear and cloudy conditions. The model was validated against discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART) simulations, airborne observations from wide-angle infrared dual-model line/area array scanner (WIDAS), and satellite observations from HJ-1A/B constellation charge-coupled device (CCD). Results demonstrate high overall accuracy in the red band (coefficient of determination (<inline-formula> <tex-math>$R^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) =0.993; root-mean-square error (RMSE) =0.008; and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) =5.481%) and near-infrared (NIR) band (<inline-formula> <tex-math>$R^{2}=0.933$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, RMSE =0.025; and MAPE =6.227%) compared to DART simulations. The simulations show strong agreement with WIDAS and HJ, achieving an <inline-formula> <tex-math>$R^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of 0.9. However, the accuracy is slightly lower for top-of-cloud reflectance, with an <inline-formula> <tex-math>$R^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and MAPE of 0.311 and 14.972%, respectively, primarily due to limitations in cloud parameterization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10969838/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10969838/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大气顶各向异性特征对植被监测和生物物理参数反演具有重要意义。核心挑战在于模拟地表和大气之间的相互作用,特别是在崎岖地形和多云条件下。GOSAILTA通过整合Santa Barbara DISORT大气辐射传输(SBDART)模型,将冠顶(TOC)各向异性反射率几何光学和任意倾斜叶片耦合地形的相互遮蔽和散射模型(GOSAILT)扩展到TOA反射率/辐射。在晴朗和多云条件下,大气与地表的相互作用主要受坡面及其周围地形的影响。通过离散各向异性辐射传输(DART)仿真、广角红外双模线阵/面阵扫描仪(WIDAS)机载观测和HJ-1A/B星座电荷耦合器件(CCD)卫星观测对模型进行了验证。结果表明,该方法在红色波段具有较高的整体准确度(决定系数($R^{2}$) =0.993;均方根误差(RMSE) =0.008;平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE) =5.481%)和近红外(NIR)波段($R^{2}=0.933$, RMSE =0.025;MAPE =6.227%)。模拟结果与WIDAS和HJ的结果非常吻合,R^{2}$为0.9。然而,云顶反射率的精度略低,R^{2}$和MAPE分别为0.311和14.972%,主要是由于云参数化的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling Top-of-Atmosphere Anisotropic Reflectance of Discrete Forests Over Sloped Surface
Characterizing the anisotropic features at the top of atmosphere (TOA) is crucial for vegetation monitoring and retrieval of biophysical parameters. The core challenge lies in modeling the mutual interactions between land surface and atmosphere, particularly in the context of rugged terrains and cloudy conditions. The GOSAILTA is proposed to extend the top-of-canopy (TOC) anisotropic reflectance geometric optical and mutual shadowing and scattering-from-arbitrarily-inclined-leaves model coupled with topography (GOSAILT) model to TOA reflectance/radiance by integrating Santa Barbara DISORT atmospheric radiative transfer (SBDART) model. The interactions between atmosphere and land surface are characterized for the effects of the sloped surface and its surrounding terrains under both clear and cloudy conditions. The model was validated against discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART) simulations, airborne observations from wide-angle infrared dual-model line/area array scanner (WIDAS), and satellite observations from HJ-1A/B constellation charge-coupled device (CCD). Results demonstrate high overall accuracy in the red band (coefficient of determination ( $R^{2}$ ) =0.993; root-mean-square error (RMSE) =0.008; and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) =5.481%) and near-infrared (NIR) band ( $R^{2}=0.933$ , RMSE =0.025; and MAPE =6.227%) compared to DART simulations. The simulations show strong agreement with WIDAS and HJ, achieving an $R^{2}$ of 0.9. However, the accuracy is slightly lower for top-of-cloud reflectance, with an $R^{2}$ and MAPE of 0.311 and 14.972%, respectively, primarily due to limitations in cloud parameterization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
28.00%
发文量
1912
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (TGRS) is a monthly publication that focuses on the theory, concepts, and techniques of science and engineering as applied to sensing the land, oceans, atmosphere, and space; and the processing, interpretation, and dissemination of this information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信