Shubham V. Kulkarni, Patrick G. J. Irwin, Colin F. Wilson, Nikolai I. Ignatiev
{"title":"利用金星13的原位光谱观测寻找近地表颗粒层","authors":"Shubham V. Kulkarni, Patrick G. J. Irwin, Colin F. Wilson, Nikolai I. Ignatiev","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Whether or not there is a particulate layer in the lowest 10 km of the Venusian atmosphere is still an open question. Some of the past in situ experiments showed the presence of a detached particulate layer, and a few suggested the existence of finely dispersed aerosols, while other instruments supported the idea of no particulate matter in the deep atmosphere. In this work, we investigate the presence of a near-surface particulate layer (NSPL) using in situ data from the Venera 13 mission. While the original spectrophotometric data from Venera 13 were lost, we have reconstructed a part of this data by digitizing the old graphic material and selected the eight most reliable Venera 13 downward radiance profiles from 0.48 to 0.8 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\upmu }$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>m for our retrievals. The retrievals suggest the existence of the particulate layer with a peak in the altitude range of 3.5–5 km. They further indicate a log-normal particle size distribution with a mean radius between 0.6 and 0.85 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\upmu }$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>m. The retrievals constrain the real refractive index of the particles to lie around the range of 1.4–1.6, with the imaginary refractive index of a magnitude of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mn>10</mn>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${10}^{-3}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Based on refractive index retrievals, uplifted basalt particles or volcanic ash could be responsible for near-surface particulates. In comparison, volatile condensates appear less likely to be behind the formation of NSPL.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008728","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Search for the Near-Surface Particulate Layer Using Venera 13 In Situ Spectroscopic Observations\",\"authors\":\"Shubham V. Kulkarni, Patrick G. J. Irwin, Colin F. Wilson, Nikolai I. Ignatiev\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JE008728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Whether or not there is a particulate layer in the lowest 10 km of the Venusian atmosphere is still an open question. Some of the past in situ experiments showed the presence of a detached particulate layer, and a few suggested the existence of finely dispersed aerosols, while other instruments supported the idea of no particulate matter in the deep atmosphere. In this work, we investigate the presence of a near-surface particulate layer (NSPL) using in situ data from the Venera 13 mission. While the original spectrophotometric data from Venera 13 were lost, we have reconstructed a part of this data by digitizing the old graphic material and selected the eight most reliable Venera 13 downward radiance profiles from 0.48 to 0.8 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>μ</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${\\\\upmu }$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>m for our retrievals. The retrievals suggest the existence of the particulate layer with a peak in the altitude range of 3.5–5 km. They further indicate a log-normal particle size distribution with a mean radius between 0.6 and 0.85 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>μ</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${\\\\upmu }$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>m. The retrievals constrain the real refractive index of the particles to lie around the range of 1.4–1.6, with the imaginary refractive index of a magnitude of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>10</mn>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>3</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${10}^{-3}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. Based on refractive index retrievals, uplifted basalt particles or volcanic ash could be responsible for near-surface particulates. In comparison, volatile condensates appear less likely to be behind the formation of NSPL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008728\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008728\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008728","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Search for the Near-Surface Particulate Layer Using Venera 13 In Situ Spectroscopic Observations
Whether or not there is a particulate layer in the lowest 10 km of the Venusian atmosphere is still an open question. Some of the past in situ experiments showed the presence of a detached particulate layer, and a few suggested the existence of finely dispersed aerosols, while other instruments supported the idea of no particulate matter in the deep atmosphere. In this work, we investigate the presence of a near-surface particulate layer (NSPL) using in situ data from the Venera 13 mission. While the original spectrophotometric data from Venera 13 were lost, we have reconstructed a part of this data by digitizing the old graphic material and selected the eight most reliable Venera 13 downward radiance profiles from 0.48 to 0.8 m for our retrievals. The retrievals suggest the existence of the particulate layer with a peak in the altitude range of 3.5–5 km. They further indicate a log-normal particle size distribution with a mean radius between 0.6 and 0.85 m. The retrievals constrain the real refractive index of the particles to lie around the range of 1.4–1.6, with the imaginary refractive index of a magnitude of . Based on refractive index retrievals, uplifted basalt particles or volcanic ash could be responsible for near-surface particulates. In comparison, volatile condensates appear less likely to be behind the formation of NSPL.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.