Choong-kun Lee , Sejung Park , Yaeji Lee , Choa Yun , Moonki Hong , Chung Mo Nam , Hyun Cheol Chung , Sun Young Rha
{"title":"一线免疫检查点抑制剂加化疗治疗胃食管癌的疗效:包括未报道的PD-L1亚组在内的III期试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Choong-kun Lee , Sejung Park , Yaeji Lee , Choa Yun , Moonki Hong , Chung Mo Nam , Hyun Cheol Chung , Sun Young Rha","doi":"10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The treatment paradigm for gastroesophageal cancers is evolving with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first-line therapy, making it crucial to understand their efficacy across patient subgroups, especially concerning PD-L1 expression. We performed a meta-analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials targeting the effectiveness of ICIs with or without chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves of all-comer populations and subgroups according to reported PD-L1 cut-offs were extracted from published reports. Using KMSubtraction algorithm, unreported PD-L1 subgroup survival data were reconstructed by utilizing published KM survival curves. Thirteen first-line phase III RCTs involving 11,795 patients with GEA or ESCC were included. For GEA, ICI with or without chemotherapy showed longer OS in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score ≥1 (HR 0.77, 95 % confidence intervals [CI] 0.71–0.83 for ICI plus chemotherapy; HR 0.86, 95 %CI 0.75–1.01 for ICI alone) compared to chemotherapy alone, showing less benefits in low PD-L1 subgroups. ICI, with or without chemotherapy displayed survival benefits among PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥1 % for ESCC (HR 0.62, 95 %CI 0.52–0.74 for ICI plus chemotherapy; HR 0.67, 95 %CI 0.54–0.84 for ICI alone) compared to chemotherapy alone. ICI combinations were similarly beneficial for Asian and global patients with GEA or ESCC. In conclusion, this meta-analysis, which includes unreported PD-L1 subgroups show benefit of ICIs with or without chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced gastroesophageal cancers, particularly among patients with high PD-L1 expression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9506,"journal":{"name":"Cancer letters","volume":"623 ","pages":"Article 217718"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of the first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of phase III trials including unreported PD-L1 subgroups\",\"authors\":\"Choong-kun Lee , Sejung Park , Yaeji Lee , Choa Yun , Moonki Hong , Chung Mo Nam , Hyun Cheol Chung , Sun Young Rha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The treatment paradigm for gastroesophageal cancers is evolving with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first-line therapy, making it crucial to understand their efficacy across patient subgroups, especially concerning PD-L1 expression. We performed a meta-analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials targeting the effectiveness of ICIs with or without chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves of all-comer populations and subgroups according to reported PD-L1 cut-offs were extracted from published reports. Using KMSubtraction algorithm, unreported PD-L1 subgroup survival data were reconstructed by utilizing published KM survival curves. Thirteen first-line phase III RCTs involving 11,795 patients with GEA or ESCC were included. For GEA, ICI with or without chemotherapy showed longer OS in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score ≥1 (HR 0.77, 95 % confidence intervals [CI] 0.71–0.83 for ICI plus chemotherapy; HR 0.86, 95 %CI 0.75–1.01 for ICI alone) compared to chemotherapy alone, showing less benefits in low PD-L1 subgroups. ICI, with or without chemotherapy displayed survival benefits among PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥1 % for ESCC (HR 0.62, 95 %CI 0.52–0.74 for ICI plus chemotherapy; HR 0.67, 95 %CI 0.54–0.84 for ICI alone) compared to chemotherapy alone. ICI combinations were similarly beneficial for Asian and global patients with GEA or ESCC. In conclusion, this meta-analysis, which includes unreported PD-L1 subgroups show benefit of ICIs with or without chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced gastroesophageal cancers, particularly among patients with high PD-L1 expression.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer letters\",\"volume\":\"623 \",\"pages\":\"Article 217718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304383525002848\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304383525002848","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
胃食管癌的治疗模式正在发展,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)作为一线治疗,这使得了解它们在患者亚组中的疗效至关重要,特别是与PD-L1表达有关。我们进行了一项针对晚期/转移性her2阴性胃食管腺癌(GEA)或食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的ICIs联合或不联合化疗有效性的III期随机对照试验的荟萃分析。根据已报道的PD-L1截止值提取所有角落人群和亚组的Kaplan-Meier (KM)曲线。使用KM减法算法,利用已发表的KM生存曲线重建未报道的PD-L1亚组生存数据。纳入了13项一线III期随机对照试验,涉及11,795例GEA或ESCC患者。对于GEA,在PD-L1联合阳性评分≥1的患者中,ICI加化疗或不加化疗的生存期较长(HR 0.77, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.71-0.83);与单独化疗相比,HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-1.01,在低PD-L1亚组中显示较少的益处。在PD-L1肿瘤比例评分≥1%的ESCC患者中,ICI加化疗或不加化疗均显示生存获益(HR 0.62, ICI加化疗95% CI 0.52-0.74;与单纯化疗相比,ICI组的HR为0.67,95% CI为0.54-0.84。对于亚洲和全球的GEA或ESCC患者,ICI联合治疗同样有益。总之,这项荟萃分析,包括未报道的PD-L1亚组,显示了ICIs作为晚期胃食管癌一线治疗的益处,特别是在PD-L1高表达的患者中。
Efficacy of the first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of phase III trials including unreported PD-L1 subgroups
The treatment paradigm for gastroesophageal cancers is evolving with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first-line therapy, making it crucial to understand their efficacy across patient subgroups, especially concerning PD-L1 expression. We performed a meta-analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials targeting the effectiveness of ICIs with or without chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves of all-comer populations and subgroups according to reported PD-L1 cut-offs were extracted from published reports. Using KMSubtraction algorithm, unreported PD-L1 subgroup survival data were reconstructed by utilizing published KM survival curves. Thirteen first-line phase III RCTs involving 11,795 patients with GEA or ESCC were included. For GEA, ICI with or without chemotherapy showed longer OS in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score ≥1 (HR 0.77, 95 % confidence intervals [CI] 0.71–0.83 for ICI plus chemotherapy; HR 0.86, 95 %CI 0.75–1.01 for ICI alone) compared to chemotherapy alone, showing less benefits in low PD-L1 subgroups. ICI, with or without chemotherapy displayed survival benefits among PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥1 % for ESCC (HR 0.62, 95 %CI 0.52–0.74 for ICI plus chemotherapy; HR 0.67, 95 %CI 0.54–0.84 for ICI alone) compared to chemotherapy alone. ICI combinations were similarly beneficial for Asian and global patients with GEA or ESCC. In conclusion, this meta-analysis, which includes unreported PD-L1 subgroups show benefit of ICIs with or without chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced gastroesophageal cancers, particularly among patients with high PD-L1 expression.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Letters is a reputable international journal that serves as a platform for significant and original contributions in cancer research. The journal welcomes both full-length articles and Mini Reviews in the wide-ranging field of basic and translational oncology. Furthermore, it frequently presents Special Issues that shed light on current and topical areas in cancer research.
Cancer Letters is highly interested in various fundamental aspects that can cater to a diverse readership. These areas include the molecular genetics and cell biology of cancer, radiation biology, molecular pathology, hormones and cancer, viral oncology, metastasis, and chemoprevention. The journal actively focuses on experimental therapeutics, particularly the advancement of targeted therapies for personalized cancer medicine, such as metronomic chemotherapy.
By publishing groundbreaking research and promoting advancements in cancer treatments, Cancer Letters aims to actively contribute to the fight against cancer and the improvement of patient outcomes.