Bar Urkin , Josef Parnas , Andrea Raballo , Danny Koren
{"title":"精神分裂症谱系障碍 (SSD):基于互联网的小故事研究:精神科医生和临床心理学家的实际诊断准确性和可靠性","authors":"Bar Urkin , Josef Parnas , Andrea Raballo , Danny Koren","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2025.100211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and hypothesis</h3><div>Diagnosing psychiatric conditions in real-life scenarios is challenging, as patients' presentations often differ from the simplified descriptors in mainstream taxonomies. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reliability of ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in diagnosing schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) through vignettes extrapolated from real-world clinical presentations.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We assessed the diagnostic performance of 70 international clinicians (psychiatrists and clinical psychologists) using an online survey. Besides the socio-demographic and professional backgrounds of the participants, the study presented two concise clinical vignettes, that portray different manifestations of typical SSD cases. Participants were asked to evaluate these vignettes, with the primary focus on identifying the most plausible diagnostic hypothesis.</div></div><div><h3>Study results</h3><div>In the first vignette, 71.4 % (50/70) identified an SSD as the main diagnosis, whereas about 23.2 % (14/60) made the same choice for the second vignette. Eleven clinicians (18.3 %) correctly identified both vignettes as SSD cases. The inter-rater diagnostic agreement was fair and significant (Fleiss’ Kappa = .29, p < .00).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings indicate poor diagnostic accuracy and reliability for SSD among ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. When compared to leading international psychiatrists (LIPs) the results suggest a concerning gap in diagnostic proficiency, particularly in real-world clinical scenarios. The low rates of correct diagnosis and fair inter-rater agreement raise concerns about the gradual erosion of in-depth psychopathological understanding in clinical practice. Improving diagnostic accuracy through better training could have profound implications for patient care and treatment outcomes in mental health settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD): an internet-based vignette study of real-world diagnostic accuracy and reliability among psychiatrists and clinical psychologists\",\"authors\":\"Bar Urkin , Josef Parnas , Andrea Raballo , Danny Koren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psycom.2025.100211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and hypothesis</h3><div>Diagnosing psychiatric conditions in real-life scenarios is challenging, as patients' presentations often differ from the simplified descriptors in mainstream taxonomies. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reliability of ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in diagnosing schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) through vignettes extrapolated from real-world clinical presentations.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We assessed the diagnostic performance of 70 international clinicians (psychiatrists and clinical psychologists) using an online survey. Besides the socio-demographic and professional backgrounds of the participants, the study presented two concise clinical vignettes, that portray different manifestations of typical SSD cases. Participants were asked to evaluate these vignettes, with the primary focus on identifying the most plausible diagnostic hypothesis.</div></div><div><h3>Study results</h3><div>In the first vignette, 71.4 % (50/70) identified an SSD as the main diagnosis, whereas about 23.2 % (14/60) made the same choice for the second vignette. Eleven clinicians (18.3 %) correctly identified both vignettes as SSD cases. The inter-rater diagnostic agreement was fair and significant (Fleiss’ Kappa = .29, p < .00).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings indicate poor diagnostic accuracy and reliability for SSD among ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. When compared to leading international psychiatrists (LIPs) the results suggest a concerning gap in diagnostic proficiency, particularly in real-world clinical scenarios. The low rates of correct diagnosis and fair inter-rater agreement raise concerns about the gradual erosion of in-depth psychopathological understanding in clinical practice. Improving diagnostic accuracy through better training could have profound implications for patient care and treatment outcomes in mental health settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry research communications\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598725000108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598725000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD): an internet-based vignette study of real-world diagnostic accuracy and reliability among psychiatrists and clinical psychologists
Background and hypothesis
Diagnosing psychiatric conditions in real-life scenarios is challenging, as patients' presentations often differ from the simplified descriptors in mainstream taxonomies. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reliability of ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in diagnosing schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) through vignettes extrapolated from real-world clinical presentations.
Study design
We assessed the diagnostic performance of 70 international clinicians (psychiatrists and clinical psychologists) using an online survey. Besides the socio-demographic and professional backgrounds of the participants, the study presented two concise clinical vignettes, that portray different manifestations of typical SSD cases. Participants were asked to evaluate these vignettes, with the primary focus on identifying the most plausible diagnostic hypothesis.
Study results
In the first vignette, 71.4 % (50/70) identified an SSD as the main diagnosis, whereas about 23.2 % (14/60) made the same choice for the second vignette. Eleven clinicians (18.3 %) correctly identified both vignettes as SSD cases. The inter-rater diagnostic agreement was fair and significant (Fleiss’ Kappa = .29, p < .00).
Conclusions
The findings indicate poor diagnostic accuracy and reliability for SSD among ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. When compared to leading international psychiatrists (LIPs) the results suggest a concerning gap in diagnostic proficiency, particularly in real-world clinical scenarios. The low rates of correct diagnosis and fair inter-rater agreement raise concerns about the gradual erosion of in-depth psychopathological understanding in clinical practice. Improving diagnostic accuracy through better training could have profound implications for patient care and treatment outcomes in mental health settings.