Jianmin Li, Junrui Chai, Zengguang Xu, Cheng Cao, Pengyuan Zhang, Han Fu
{"title":"刮伤HDPE土工膜拉伸破坏机理及应力-应变行为","authors":"Jianmin Li, Junrui Chai, Zengguang Xu, Cheng Cao, Pengyuan Zhang, Han Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the application of geomembranes (GMBs) for anti-seepage purposes, damage and defects are almost inevitable and can lead to premature failure during their service life. This study conducted a series of indoor tensile tests on defective GMBs to evaluate the effects of various defect types, locations, and geometric characteristics on their failure behavior. The results were validated through orthogonal tests to determine the influence of defect quantity and combination patterns on GMB performance. Furthermore, the performance at different stages was assessed under the condition of varying scratch geometric characteristics. The findings indicate that scratches pose a greater threat to GMB performance compared to other defect types. At the same angle, variations in scratch position have a negligible effect on mechanical properties. Among scratch geometric characteristics, length and angle are the primary factors affecting performance. For practical engineering applications, the allowable tensile stress range for scratched GMBs should be maintained between 2.97 and 3.50 MPa, while the allowable tensile strain range should be confined to 1.78–3.30 %. The evaluation and prediction of each stage of scratched GMBs can provide references for design engineers and the repair of scratched GMBs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 1048-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tensile failure mechanism and stress-strain behavior of scratched HDPE geomembranes\",\"authors\":\"Jianmin Li, Junrui Chai, Zengguang Xu, Cheng Cao, Pengyuan Zhang, Han Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the application of geomembranes (GMBs) for anti-seepage purposes, damage and defects are almost inevitable and can lead to premature failure during their service life. This study conducted a series of indoor tensile tests on defective GMBs to evaluate the effects of various defect types, locations, and geometric characteristics on their failure behavior. The results were validated through orthogonal tests to determine the influence of defect quantity and combination patterns on GMB performance. Furthermore, the performance at different stages was assessed under the condition of varying scratch geometric characteristics. The findings indicate that scratches pose a greater threat to GMB performance compared to other defect types. At the same angle, variations in scratch position have a negligible effect on mechanical properties. Among scratch geometric characteristics, length and angle are the primary factors affecting performance. For practical engineering applications, the allowable tensile stress range for scratched GMBs should be maintained between 2.97 and 3.50 MPa, while the allowable tensile strain range should be confined to 1.78–3.30 %. The evaluation and prediction of each stage of scratched GMBs can provide references for design engineers and the repair of scratched GMBs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1048-1062\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026611442500041X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026611442500041X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tensile failure mechanism and stress-strain behavior of scratched HDPE geomembranes
In the application of geomembranes (GMBs) for anti-seepage purposes, damage and defects are almost inevitable and can lead to premature failure during their service life. This study conducted a series of indoor tensile tests on defective GMBs to evaluate the effects of various defect types, locations, and geometric characteristics on their failure behavior. The results were validated through orthogonal tests to determine the influence of defect quantity and combination patterns on GMB performance. Furthermore, the performance at different stages was assessed under the condition of varying scratch geometric characteristics. The findings indicate that scratches pose a greater threat to GMB performance compared to other defect types. At the same angle, variations in scratch position have a negligible effect on mechanical properties. Among scratch geometric characteristics, length and angle are the primary factors affecting performance. For practical engineering applications, the allowable tensile stress range for scratched GMBs should be maintained between 2.97 and 3.50 MPa, while the allowable tensile strain range should be confined to 1.78–3.30 %. The evaluation and prediction of each stage of scratched GMBs can provide references for design engineers and the repair of scratched GMBs.
期刊介绍:
The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.