人-人工智能协同创作的作者身份:一个创造性控制理论的视角

IF 3.3 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Wei Liu , Weijie Huang
{"title":"人-人工智能协同创作的作者身份:一个创造性控制理论的视角","authors":"Wei Liu ,&nbsp;Weijie Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The emergence of human-AI collaborative creation (HAIC) models has provided a good opportunity to uncover the principles of authorship identification. To clarify whether humans exert control over AI-generated content (AIGC) and whether such control is sufficient to confer authorship, we propose the theory of creative control from a law and aesthetics perspective. According to this theory, a human can claim authorship when they are guided by artistic imagery thinking and manifest individual creativity throughout the entire creation process from conception to execution. In the HAIC model, the unpredictable nature of the AI black box does not impede the recognition of users’ control, as users possess the capability for artistic imagery thinking to direct the entire creation process. If their contribution meets the originality standard, they qualify as the author of the AIGC. Current prevailing views that evaluate AIGC’s originality on the basis of either the final form of expression or the users’ prompts in the initial stage overlook the dynamic nature of the creative process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 106139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authorship in Human-AI collaborative creation: A creative control theory perspective\",\"authors\":\"Wei Liu ,&nbsp;Weijie Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The emergence of human-AI collaborative creation (HAIC) models has provided a good opportunity to uncover the principles of authorship identification. To clarify whether humans exert control over AI-generated content (AIGC) and whether such control is sufficient to confer authorship, we propose the theory of creative control from a law and aesthetics perspective. According to this theory, a human can claim authorship when they are guided by artistic imagery thinking and manifest individual creativity throughout the entire creation process from conception to execution. In the HAIC model, the unpredictable nature of the AI black box does not impede the recognition of users’ control, as users possess the capability for artistic imagery thinking to direct the entire creation process. If their contribution meets the originality standard, they qualify as the author of the AIGC. Current prevailing views that evaluate AIGC’s originality on the basis of either the final form of expression or the users’ prompts in the initial stage overlook the dynamic nature of the creative process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212473X25000124\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212473X25000124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类-人工智能协同创作(HAIC)模型的出现为揭示作者身份识别原则提供了一个很好的机会。为了澄清人类是否对人工智能生成的内容(AIGC)施加控制,以及这种控制是否足以授予作者,我们从法律和美学的角度提出了创造性控制理论。根据这一理论,当一个人在艺术意象思维的指导下,从构思到执行的整个创作过程中表现出个人的创造力时,他就可以声称自己是作者。在HAIC模型中,人工智能黑匣子的不可预测性并不妨碍对用户控制的识别,因为用户拥有艺术意象思维的能力来指导整个创作过程。如果他们的贡献符合原创性标准,他们就有资格成为AIGC的作者。目前流行的评价AIGC原创性的观点,要么是基于最终的表达形式,要么是基于用户在初始阶段的提示,忽视了创作过程的动态性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Authorship in Human-AI collaborative creation: A creative control theory perspective
The emergence of human-AI collaborative creation (HAIC) models has provided a good opportunity to uncover the principles of authorship identification. To clarify whether humans exert control over AI-generated content (AIGC) and whether such control is sufficient to confer authorship, we propose the theory of creative control from a law and aesthetics perspective. According to this theory, a human can claim authorship when they are guided by artistic imagery thinking and manifest individual creativity throughout the entire creation process from conception to execution. In the HAIC model, the unpredictable nature of the AI black box does not impede the recognition of users’ control, as users possess the capability for artistic imagery thinking to direct the entire creation process. If their contribution meets the originality standard, they qualify as the author of the AIGC. Current prevailing views that evaluate AIGC’s originality on the basis of either the final form of expression or the users’ prompts in the initial stage overlook the dynamic nature of the creative process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信