葡萄牙麻醉师体力活动与压力的关系

IF 0.7 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
José Correia , Vítor Rodrigues , Patrícia Santos , Margarida Barbosa
{"title":"葡萄牙麻醉师体力活动与压力的关系","authors":"José Correia ,&nbsp;Vítor Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Patrícia Santos ,&nbsp;Margarida Barbosa","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Anaesthetists face significant daily stress, which can impact their health and clinical performance. While regular physical exercise has been shown to reduce stress, there is a lack of research on this topic among Portuguese anaesthetists. This study aims to: (1) assess physical activity and perceived stress levels among Portuguese anaesthetists and establish a relationship between them in this group, and (2) identify potential professional or personal barriers to exercise.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online survey distributed to Portuguese anaesthetists registered with the Portuguese Society of Anaesthesiology. The questionnaire collected sociodemographic data and included the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 252 participants were analysed. The majority (49.2 %) engaged in moderate physical activity; 24.2 % reported high levels, and 26.6 % had low levels. Most participants (57.1 %) reported moderate stress, 34.1 % low stress, and 8.7 % high stress. A weak negative correlation was found between physical activity and stress (rho = −0.187, p = 0.003), suggesting higher physical activity may be associated with lower stress. However, ANOVA did not show significant differences in stress levels across activity categories (p = 0.0732).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although a weak inverse correlation was observed, findings suggest physical activity alone may not determine stress levels. Given the high workload and burnout risk, institutional strategies promoting well-being, such as structured exercise programmes and workload management, should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between physical activity and stress among Portuguese Anaesthetists\",\"authors\":\"José Correia ,&nbsp;Vítor Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Patrícia Santos ,&nbsp;Margarida Barbosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tacc.2025.101549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Anaesthetists face significant daily stress, which can impact their health and clinical performance. While regular physical exercise has been shown to reduce stress, there is a lack of research on this topic among Portuguese anaesthetists. This study aims to: (1) assess physical activity and perceived stress levels among Portuguese anaesthetists and establish a relationship between them in this group, and (2) identify potential professional or personal barriers to exercise.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online survey distributed to Portuguese anaesthetists registered with the Portuguese Society of Anaesthesiology. The questionnaire collected sociodemographic data and included the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 252 participants were analysed. The majority (49.2 %) engaged in moderate physical activity; 24.2 % reported high levels, and 26.6 % had low levels. Most participants (57.1 %) reported moderate stress, 34.1 % low stress, and 8.7 % high stress. A weak negative correlation was found between physical activity and stress (rho = −0.187, p = 0.003), suggesting higher physical activity may be associated with lower stress. However, ANOVA did not show significant differences in stress levels across activity categories (p = 0.0732).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although a weak inverse correlation was observed, findings suggest physical activity alone may not determine stress levels. Given the high workload and burnout risk, institutional strategies promoting well-being, such as structured exercise programmes and workload management, should be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210844025000334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210844025000334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

麻醉师面临着巨大的日常压力,这可能会影响他们的健康和临床表现。虽然有规律的体育锻炼已被证明可以减轻压力,但在葡萄牙麻醉师中缺乏这方面的研究。本研究旨在:(1)评估葡萄牙麻醉师的身体活动和感知压力水平,并建立这一群体中他们之间的关系;(2)确定潜在的专业或个人运动障碍。方法:本横断面研究采用匿名在线调查,调查对象为在葡萄牙麻醉学会注册的葡萄牙麻醉师。问卷收集了社会人口学数据,包括国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)和感知压力量表(PSS-10)。结果共分析了252名参与者。大多数人(49.2%)从事适度体育活动;24.2%报告高水平,26.6%报告低水平。大多数参与者(57.1%)报告中等压力,34.1%报告低压力,8.7%报告高压力。体力活动与压力之间呈弱负相关(rho = - 0.187, p = 0.003),表明体力活动越多,压力越低。然而,方差分析没有显示不同活动类别的压力水平有显著差异(p = 0.0732)。结论:虽然观察到微弱的负相关,但研究结果表明,体育活动本身可能不能决定压力水平。鉴于高工作量和倦怠风险,应考虑促进福利的体制战略,如有组织的锻炼方案和工作量管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association between physical activity and stress among Portuguese Anaesthetists

Association between physical activity and stress among Portuguese Anaesthetists

Introduction

Anaesthetists face significant daily stress, which can impact their health and clinical performance. While regular physical exercise has been shown to reduce stress, there is a lack of research on this topic among Portuguese anaesthetists. This study aims to: (1) assess physical activity and perceived stress levels among Portuguese anaesthetists and establish a relationship between them in this group, and (2) identify potential professional or personal barriers to exercise.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online survey distributed to Portuguese anaesthetists registered with the Portuguese Society of Anaesthesiology. The questionnaire collected sociodemographic data and included the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10).

Results

A total of 252 participants were analysed. The majority (49.2 %) engaged in moderate physical activity; 24.2 % reported high levels, and 26.6 % had low levels. Most participants (57.1 %) reported moderate stress, 34.1 % low stress, and 8.7 % high stress. A weak negative correlation was found between physical activity and stress (rho = −0.187, p = 0.003), suggesting higher physical activity may be associated with lower stress. However, ANOVA did not show significant differences in stress levels across activity categories (p = 0.0732).

Conclusions

Although a weak inverse correlation was observed, findings suggest physical activity alone may not determine stress levels. Given the high workload and burnout risk, institutional strategies promoting well-being, such as structured exercise programmes and workload management, should be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信