认知能力的个体差异能否预测网络安全绩效?

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Kelly A Cole , Alexander L. Francis , Marcus K Rogers , Joe Balazs
{"title":"认知能力的个体差异能否预测网络安全绩效?","authors":"Kelly A Cole ,&nbsp;Alexander L. Francis ,&nbsp;Marcus K Rogers ,&nbsp;Joe Balazs","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2025.104497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cyber defense analysts work in highly demanding environments, making numerous critical decisions on the basis of complex information presented at a rapid rate. Individual differences in cognitive capacity may contribute significantly to cyber performance success but researchers have yet to definitively determine what cognitive functions play the most significant role in cybersecurity performance. To further understand the role of individual differences in attention and cognition that affect cyber performance in the cybersecurity domain, this exploratory study involved collecting measures of cognitive performance from 19 experienced cybersecurity analysts using three well-established measures designed for individual differences research. The individual differences were compared with behavioral performance (accuracy and response time) in a simulated incident detection system identified as ecologically valid in cybersecurity research. Results showed a significant relationship between incident detection performance and multiple cognitive variables. Specifically, analysts with higher working memory capacity performed more accurately and more quickly, while those that showed more evidence of distractibility performed less well. These findings suggest that easily obtained behavioral measures of attention control may be useful for: (a) identifying individuals who may be better suited to performing specific cognitive demands of incident detection tasks, and (b) informing system design to reduce demands on specific areas of cognitive processing to improve incident response decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 104497"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can individual differences in cognitive capacity predict cybersecurity performance?\",\"authors\":\"Kelly A Cole ,&nbsp;Alexander L. Francis ,&nbsp;Marcus K Rogers ,&nbsp;Joe Balazs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cose.2025.104497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cyber defense analysts work in highly demanding environments, making numerous critical decisions on the basis of complex information presented at a rapid rate. Individual differences in cognitive capacity may contribute significantly to cyber performance success but researchers have yet to definitively determine what cognitive functions play the most significant role in cybersecurity performance. To further understand the role of individual differences in attention and cognition that affect cyber performance in the cybersecurity domain, this exploratory study involved collecting measures of cognitive performance from 19 experienced cybersecurity analysts using three well-established measures designed for individual differences research. The individual differences were compared with behavioral performance (accuracy and response time) in a simulated incident detection system identified as ecologically valid in cybersecurity research. Results showed a significant relationship between incident detection performance and multiple cognitive variables. Specifically, analysts with higher working memory capacity performed more accurately and more quickly, while those that showed more evidence of distractibility performed less well. These findings suggest that easily obtained behavioral measures of attention control may be useful for: (a) identifying individuals who may be better suited to performing specific cognitive demands of incident detection tasks, and (b) informing system design to reduce demands on specific areas of cognitive processing to improve incident response decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Security\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404825001853\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404825001853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络防御分析师在高要求的环境中工作,在快速呈现的复杂信息的基础上做出许多关键决策。认知能力的个体差异可能对网络绩效的成功有重要影响,但研究人员尚未明确确定哪些认知功能在网络安全绩效中发挥最重要的作用。为了进一步了解注意力和认知的个体差异对网络安全领域网络绩效的影响,本探索性研究收集了19位经验丰富的网络安全分析师的认知绩效指标,使用了三种为个体差异研究而设计的成熟指标。将个体差异与网络安全研究中生态有效的模拟事件检测系统中的行为表现(准确性和响应时间)进行比较。结果表明,事件检测性能与多个认知变量之间存在显著关系。具体来说,工作记忆容量更高的分析师表现得更准确、更快,而那些表现出更多分心迹象的分析师表现得更差。这些发现表明,容易获得的注意力控制行为测量可能有助于:(a)识别可能更适合执行事件检测任务的特定认知需求的个体,以及(b)告知系统设计以减少对特定认知处理区域的需求,以改善事件响应决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can individual differences in cognitive capacity predict cybersecurity performance?
Cyber defense analysts work in highly demanding environments, making numerous critical decisions on the basis of complex information presented at a rapid rate. Individual differences in cognitive capacity may contribute significantly to cyber performance success but researchers have yet to definitively determine what cognitive functions play the most significant role in cybersecurity performance. To further understand the role of individual differences in attention and cognition that affect cyber performance in the cybersecurity domain, this exploratory study involved collecting measures of cognitive performance from 19 experienced cybersecurity analysts using three well-established measures designed for individual differences research. The individual differences were compared with behavioral performance (accuracy and response time) in a simulated incident detection system identified as ecologically valid in cybersecurity research. Results showed a significant relationship between incident detection performance and multiple cognitive variables. Specifically, analysts with higher working memory capacity performed more accurately and more quickly, while those that showed more evidence of distractibility performed less well. These findings suggest that easily obtained behavioral measures of attention control may be useful for: (a) identifying individuals who may be better suited to performing specific cognitive demands of incident detection tasks, and (b) informing system design to reduce demands on specific areas of cognitive processing to improve incident response decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信