C.R. Kirman , G. Boysen , M.J. DiNovi , R. Roy , B.R. Sonawane , S.M. Hays
{"title":"美国1,3-丁二烯暴露的人类健康风险评估,由独立科学咨询小组提供意见","authors":"C.R. Kirman , G. Boysen , M.J. DiNovi , R. Roy , B.R. Sonawane , S.M. Hays","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A human health risk assessment was conducted for potential cancer and noncancer effects of 1,3-butadiene (BD) using best available science, data, and methodologies. An independent panel of experts was engaged to provide input and guidance on key decisions made in the quantitative assessment. BD biomarker data played an important role in quantifying species differences, human variation, and quantifying smoking exposures. The assessment included consideration of nineteen scenarios for potential worker exposures, each of which include characterization of the impact of respirator use, and seven scenarios for aggregate exposures to BD across pathways. Monte Carlo methods were used to characterize uncertainty and variation risks and hazards from exposures to BD. The results of this assessment support three general conclusions: (1) ambient air is generally not an important source of BD exposure to the U.S. population when compared to other sources; (2) exposures to BD in the US are not expected to pose an unreasonable risk of cancer or noncancer effects; and (3) the existing OSHA PEL of 1 ppm is considered to be protective of the potential cancer risks and noncancer hazards from BD exposures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 105819"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human health risk assessment for exposures to 1,3-butadiene in the United States with input from an independent science advisory panel\",\"authors\":\"C.R. Kirman , G. Boysen , M.J. DiNovi , R. Roy , B.R. Sonawane , S.M. Hays\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A human health risk assessment was conducted for potential cancer and noncancer effects of 1,3-butadiene (BD) using best available science, data, and methodologies. An independent panel of experts was engaged to provide input and guidance on key decisions made in the quantitative assessment. BD biomarker data played an important role in quantifying species differences, human variation, and quantifying smoking exposures. The assessment included consideration of nineteen scenarios for potential worker exposures, each of which include characterization of the impact of respirator use, and seven scenarios for aggregate exposures to BD across pathways. Monte Carlo methods were used to characterize uncertainty and variation risks and hazards from exposures to BD. The results of this assessment support three general conclusions: (1) ambient air is generally not an important source of BD exposure to the U.S. population when compared to other sources; (2) exposures to BD in the US are not expected to pose an unreasonable risk of cancer or noncancer effects; and (3) the existing OSHA PEL of 1 ppm is considered to be protective of the potential cancer risks and noncancer hazards from BD exposures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105819\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human health risk assessment for exposures to 1,3-butadiene in the United States with input from an independent science advisory panel
A human health risk assessment was conducted for potential cancer and noncancer effects of 1,3-butadiene (BD) using best available science, data, and methodologies. An independent panel of experts was engaged to provide input and guidance on key decisions made in the quantitative assessment. BD biomarker data played an important role in quantifying species differences, human variation, and quantifying smoking exposures. The assessment included consideration of nineteen scenarios for potential worker exposures, each of which include characterization of the impact of respirator use, and seven scenarios for aggregate exposures to BD across pathways. Monte Carlo methods were used to characterize uncertainty and variation risks and hazards from exposures to BD. The results of this assessment support three general conclusions: (1) ambient air is generally not an important source of BD exposure to the U.S. population when compared to other sources; (2) exposures to BD in the US are not expected to pose an unreasonable risk of cancer or noncancer effects; and (3) the existing OSHA PEL of 1 ppm is considered to be protective of the potential cancer risks and noncancer hazards from BD exposures.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)