Taryn G. Vosters MSc , Vianda S. Stel PhD , Kitty J. Jager MD, PhD , Bart Ferwerda PhD , Roos F. Marsman MD, PhD , Frans J. van Ittersum MD, PhD , Bert-Jan H. van den Born MD, PhD , Henrike Galenkamp PhD , Liffert Vogt MD, PhD , Irene G.M. van Valkengoed PhD
{"title":"当前慢性肾脏疾病筛查标准在不同种族男女中的表现:HELIUS研究","authors":"Taryn G. Vosters MSc , Vianda S. Stel PhD , Kitty J. Jager MD, PhD , Bart Ferwerda PhD , Roos F. Marsman MD, PhD , Frans J. van Ittersum MD, PhD , Bert-Jan H. van den Born MD, PhD , Henrike Galenkamp PhD , Liffert Vogt MD, PhD , Irene G.M. van Valkengoed PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate whether the currently recommended screening criteria in Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2024 guidelines (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease) equally detect women and men across ethnic groups and whether consideration of optional criteria (education level, occupation, obesity, and genetic risk factors) listed in the guideline improves performance.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>We included 12,384 women and 9046 men of Dutch, South Asian and African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish, and Moroccan origin from the baseline HELIUS Study (January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2015, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> or albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >3 mg/mmol. Poisson regression analyses estimated associations between CKD and optional criteria on top of current screening criteria. Model comparisons were made with likelihood ratio tests and Akaike information criterion estimations in women and men. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated by sex and ethnicity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Chronic kidney disease prevalence ranged from 2.9% to 8.8% in women and 3.2% to 8.6% in men. Low educational level (women only) and obesity significantly improved the models with current criteria with CKD. High-risk occupations and polygenic risk score did not improve the model. However, these criteria did not improve predictive measures across ethnic groups. Overall, the AUCs for the current screening criteria were acceptable in men (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.73-0.77) and poor in women (AUC, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.63-0.67), and showed minimal change after adding the optional criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Current screening criteria may not be equally detecting women and men across ethnic groups with CKD. Optional criteria had limited added value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100613"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Current Chronic Kidney Disease Screening Criteria in Women and Men Across Ethnic Groups: The HELIUS Study\",\"authors\":\"Taryn G. Vosters MSc , Vianda S. Stel PhD , Kitty J. Jager MD, PhD , Bart Ferwerda PhD , Roos F. Marsman MD, PhD , Frans J. van Ittersum MD, PhD , Bert-Jan H. van den Born MD, PhD , Henrike Galenkamp PhD , Liffert Vogt MD, PhD , Irene G.M. van Valkengoed PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate whether the currently recommended screening criteria in Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2024 guidelines (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease) equally detect women and men across ethnic groups and whether consideration of optional criteria (education level, occupation, obesity, and genetic risk factors) listed in the guideline improves performance.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>We included 12,384 women and 9046 men of Dutch, South Asian and African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish, and Moroccan origin from the baseline HELIUS Study (January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2015, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> or albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >3 mg/mmol. Poisson regression analyses estimated associations between CKD and optional criteria on top of current screening criteria. Model comparisons were made with likelihood ratio tests and Akaike information criterion estimations in women and men. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated by sex and ethnicity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Chronic kidney disease prevalence ranged from 2.9% to 8.8% in women and 3.2% to 8.6% in men. Low educational level (women only) and obesity significantly improved the models with current criteria with CKD. High-risk occupations and polygenic risk score did not improve the model. However, these criteria did not improve predictive measures across ethnic groups. Overall, the AUCs for the current screening criteria were acceptable in men (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.73-0.77) and poor in women (AUC, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.63-0.67), and showed minimal change after adding the optional criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Current screening criteria may not be equally detecting women and men across ethnic groups with CKD. Optional criteria had limited added value.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of Current Chronic Kidney Disease Screening Criteria in Women and Men Across Ethnic Groups: The HELIUS Study
Objective
To investigate whether the currently recommended screening criteria in Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2024 guidelines (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease) equally detect women and men across ethnic groups and whether consideration of optional criteria (education level, occupation, obesity, and genetic risk factors) listed in the guideline improves performance.
Patients and Methods
We included 12,384 women and 9046 men of Dutch, South Asian and African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish, and Moroccan origin from the baseline HELIUS Study (January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2015, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >3 mg/mmol. Poisson regression analyses estimated associations between CKD and optional criteria on top of current screening criteria. Model comparisons were made with likelihood ratio tests and Akaike information criterion estimations in women and men. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated by sex and ethnicity.
Results
Chronic kidney disease prevalence ranged from 2.9% to 8.8% in women and 3.2% to 8.6% in men. Low educational level (women only) and obesity significantly improved the models with current criteria with CKD. High-risk occupations and polygenic risk score did not improve the model. However, these criteria did not improve predictive measures across ethnic groups. Overall, the AUCs for the current screening criteria were acceptable in men (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.73-0.77) and poor in women (AUC, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.63-0.67), and showed minimal change after adding the optional criteria.
Conclusion
Current screening criteria may not be equally detecting women and men across ethnic groups with CKD. Optional criteria had limited added value.