30公里/小时限速以改善公众健康:荷兰鹿特丹一项自然实验的研究方案

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Carel-Peter L. van Erpecum , Anna Bornioli , Pilar García-Gómez , Famke J.M. Mölenberg , Nicolette R. den Braver
{"title":"30公里/小时限速以改善公众健康:荷兰鹿特丹一项自然实验的研究方案","authors":"Carel-Peter L. van Erpecum ,&nbsp;Anna Bornioli ,&nbsp;Pilar García-Gómez ,&nbsp;Famke J.M. Mölenberg ,&nbsp;Nicolette R. den Braver","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Thirty kilometre per hour (km/h) interventions effectively reduce road-traffic injuries, yet its broader health and social impacts remain unclear. The Municipality of Rotterdam, the Netherlands will implement 30 km/h interventions, offering opportunities for prospective natural experimental evaluation. This study aims, firstly, to assess impacts of 30 km/h interventions on <em>self-reported</em> changes in health outcomes, including physical activity (PA), active travel, noise exposure, and sleep quality and social outcomes, including neighbourhood cohesion and safety perceptions. Secondly, we aim to investigate impacts of 30 km/h interventions on changes in <em>objective</em> PA. Thirdly, we explore to what extent these impacts are moderated by age, individual and neighbourhood socio-economic position (SEP), ethnicity, and health status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We designed a prospective natural experiment by setting up a longitudinal open cohort study with pre-intervention (June–October 2023) and one-year follow-up (June–October 2024) measurements. Intervention sites are 15 streets in Rotterdam with speed limit changes from 50 km/h to 30 km/h, accompanied with physical calming measures. Control streets remained 50 km/h. To investigate unintended outcomes at adjacent streets, streets remaining 50 km/h and within &lt;250 m from the nearest intervention street were categorized as spillover streets. At baseline, 10,860 households are invited for a household survey about socio-demographic characteristics and health and social outcomes. Survey participants could additionally wear an accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X) for 8 consecutive days. To assess impacts of 30 km/h interventions on changes in self-reported health and social outcomes and objective PA, we will use difference-in-difference analyses. We will also evaluate unintended effects on adjacent streets (i.e., spill-over effects). Stratified analyses will be conducted to assess moderation.</div></div><div><h3>Expected results and discussion</h3><div>This study improves the understanding on health and social impacts of 30 km/h interventions. Furthermore, this study sets a real-world example of how to investigate outcomes through a natural experimental evaluation that are not routinely collected. Ultimately, this can inform policies towards healthy, liveable, and inclusive cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 102042"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thirty km/h speed limits for better public health: Study protocol of a natural experiment in Rotterdam, the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Carel-Peter L. van Erpecum ,&nbsp;Anna Bornioli ,&nbsp;Pilar García-Gómez ,&nbsp;Famke J.M. Mölenberg ,&nbsp;Nicolette R. den Braver\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Thirty kilometre per hour (km/h) interventions effectively reduce road-traffic injuries, yet its broader health and social impacts remain unclear. The Municipality of Rotterdam, the Netherlands will implement 30 km/h interventions, offering opportunities for prospective natural experimental evaluation. This study aims, firstly, to assess impacts of 30 km/h interventions on <em>self-reported</em> changes in health outcomes, including physical activity (PA), active travel, noise exposure, and sleep quality and social outcomes, including neighbourhood cohesion and safety perceptions. Secondly, we aim to investigate impacts of 30 km/h interventions on changes in <em>objective</em> PA. Thirdly, we explore to what extent these impacts are moderated by age, individual and neighbourhood socio-economic position (SEP), ethnicity, and health status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We designed a prospective natural experiment by setting up a longitudinal open cohort study with pre-intervention (June–October 2023) and one-year follow-up (June–October 2024) measurements. Intervention sites are 15 streets in Rotterdam with speed limit changes from 50 km/h to 30 km/h, accompanied with physical calming measures. Control streets remained 50 km/h. To investigate unintended outcomes at adjacent streets, streets remaining 50 km/h and within &lt;250 m from the nearest intervention street were categorized as spillover streets. At baseline, 10,860 households are invited for a household survey about socio-demographic characteristics and health and social outcomes. Survey participants could additionally wear an accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X) for 8 consecutive days. To assess impacts of 30 km/h interventions on changes in self-reported health and social outcomes and objective PA, we will use difference-in-difference analyses. We will also evaluate unintended effects on adjacent streets (i.e., spill-over effects). Stratified analyses will be conducted to assess moderation.</div></div><div><h3>Expected results and discussion</h3><div>This study improves the understanding on health and social impacts of 30 km/h interventions. Furthermore, this study sets a real-world example of how to investigate outcomes through a natural experimental evaluation that are not routinely collected. Ultimately, this can inform policies towards healthy, liveable, and inclusive cities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000623\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景每小时30公里的干预措施可有效减少道路交通伤害,但其更广泛的健康和社会影响尚不清楚。荷兰鹿特丹市将实施30公里/小时的干预措施,为前瞻性的自然实验评估提供机会。首先,本研究旨在评估30公里/小时干预措施对自我报告的健康结果变化的影响,包括身体活动(PA)、主动旅行、噪音暴露、睡眠质量和社会结果,包括邻里凝聚力和安全感知。其次,我们的目标是研究30 km/h干预对客观PA变化的影响。第三,我们探讨了这些影响在多大程度上受到年龄、个人和社区社会经济地位(SEP)、种族和健康状况的调节。方法采用前瞻性自然实验设计,采用干预前(2023年6月- 10月)和1年随访(2024年6月- 10月)进行纵向开放队列研究。干预地点是鹿特丹的15条街道,限速从50公里/小时改为30公里/小时,并伴有物理平静措施。对照街道保持每小时50公里。为了调查邻近街道的意外后果,距离最近的干预街道250米以内且速度为50公里/小时的街道被归类为溢出街道。在基线时,邀请10 860户家庭进行关于社会人口特征以及健康和社会结果的家庭调查。调查参与者还可以连续8天佩戴加速度计(Actigraph GT3X)。为了评估30公里/小时的干预措施对自我报告的健康和社会结果以及客观PA变化的影响,我们将使用差异中差异分析。我们还将评估对邻近街道的意外影响(即溢出效应)。将进行分层分析以评估适度性。预期结果和讨论本研究提高了对30公里/小时干预措施的健康和社会影响的理解。此外,本研究设置了一个真实世界的例子,说明如何通过不定期收集的自然实验评估来调查结果。最终,这可以为健康、宜居和包容城市的政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thirty km/h speed limits for better public health: Study protocol of a natural experiment in Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Background

Thirty kilometre per hour (km/h) interventions effectively reduce road-traffic injuries, yet its broader health and social impacts remain unclear. The Municipality of Rotterdam, the Netherlands will implement 30 km/h interventions, offering opportunities for prospective natural experimental evaluation. This study aims, firstly, to assess impacts of 30 km/h interventions on self-reported changes in health outcomes, including physical activity (PA), active travel, noise exposure, and sleep quality and social outcomes, including neighbourhood cohesion and safety perceptions. Secondly, we aim to investigate impacts of 30 km/h interventions on changes in objective PA. Thirdly, we explore to what extent these impacts are moderated by age, individual and neighbourhood socio-economic position (SEP), ethnicity, and health status.

Methods

We designed a prospective natural experiment by setting up a longitudinal open cohort study with pre-intervention (June–October 2023) and one-year follow-up (June–October 2024) measurements. Intervention sites are 15 streets in Rotterdam with speed limit changes from 50 km/h to 30 km/h, accompanied with physical calming measures. Control streets remained 50 km/h. To investigate unintended outcomes at adjacent streets, streets remaining 50 km/h and within <250 m from the nearest intervention street were categorized as spillover streets. At baseline, 10,860 households are invited for a household survey about socio-demographic characteristics and health and social outcomes. Survey participants could additionally wear an accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X) for 8 consecutive days. To assess impacts of 30 km/h interventions on changes in self-reported health and social outcomes and objective PA, we will use difference-in-difference analyses. We will also evaluate unintended effects on adjacent streets (i.e., spill-over effects). Stratified analyses will be conducted to assess moderation.

Expected results and discussion

This study improves the understanding on health and social impacts of 30 km/h interventions. Furthermore, this study sets a real-world example of how to investigate outcomes through a natural experimental evaluation that are not routinely collected. Ultimately, this can inform policies towards healthy, liveable, and inclusive cities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信