BBNJ协定下环境影响评估条款在公海海洋保护区的应用:挑战与建议

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Yong Wang, Xin Pan
{"title":"BBNJ协定下环境影响评估条款在公海海洋保护区的应用:挑战与建议","authors":"Yong Wang, Xin Pan","doi":"10.3389/fmars.2025.1589936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Once the BBNJ Agreement enters into force, its environmental impact assessment (EIA) provisions will apply to high seas marine protected areas (MPAs). This paper examines current treaties and practices within four high seas MPAs and finds that the EIA provisions established by United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) are ambiguous. The BBNJ Agreement, however, reflects a strong commitment to improving EIA laws and practices in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ). Despite this progress, several challenges may arise in implementing the BBNJ Agreement’s EIA provisions in high seas MPAs. These include potential fragmentation when members of the international frameworks or bodies (IFBs) of high seas MPAs do not ratify the agreement, uncertainties surrounding the “not undermine” proviso, and ambiguities in the “due regard” principle. Additionally, the Clearing-House Mechanism (Cl-HM) under the BBNJ Agreement requires further development to cooperate with the institutions of high seas MPAs, and the fragmented EIA standards, subjects and procedures for high seas MPAs complicate the determination of equivalency with those under the BBNJ Agreement. Moreover, the EIA provisions for existing high seas MPAs appear limited. It is worth mentioning that the practices of the EIA in high seas MPAs may not be sufficient. This paper offers several recommendations for the above challenges: encouraging non-Parties to apply the EIA provisions under the BBNJ Agreement, putting forward a possible interpretation or understanding for the “not undermine” proviso and “due regard”, developing the CL-HM through the BBNJ Secretariat, and developing EIA guidelines for high seas MPAs, supported by the Scientific and Technical Body set by the BBNJ Agreement. Furthermore, members of the IFBs of high seas MPAs should enhance their EIA practices to ensure effective application of the BBNJ Agreement’s provisions in the future.","PeriodicalId":12479,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Marine Science","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the environmental impact assessment provisions under the BBNJ Agreement in high seas marine protected area: challenges and suggestion\",\"authors\":\"Yong Wang, Xin Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmars.2025.1589936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Once the BBNJ Agreement enters into force, its environmental impact assessment (EIA) provisions will apply to high seas marine protected areas (MPAs). This paper examines current treaties and practices within four high seas MPAs and finds that the EIA provisions established by United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) are ambiguous. The BBNJ Agreement, however, reflects a strong commitment to improving EIA laws and practices in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ). Despite this progress, several challenges may arise in implementing the BBNJ Agreement’s EIA provisions in high seas MPAs. These include potential fragmentation when members of the international frameworks or bodies (IFBs) of high seas MPAs do not ratify the agreement, uncertainties surrounding the “not undermine” proviso, and ambiguities in the “due regard” principle. Additionally, the Clearing-House Mechanism (Cl-HM) under the BBNJ Agreement requires further development to cooperate with the institutions of high seas MPAs, and the fragmented EIA standards, subjects and procedures for high seas MPAs complicate the determination of equivalency with those under the BBNJ Agreement. Moreover, the EIA provisions for existing high seas MPAs appear limited. It is worth mentioning that the practices of the EIA in high seas MPAs may not be sufficient. This paper offers several recommendations for the above challenges: encouraging non-Parties to apply the EIA provisions under the BBNJ Agreement, putting forward a possible interpretation or understanding for the “not undermine” proviso and “due regard”, developing the CL-HM through the BBNJ Secretariat, and developing EIA guidelines for high seas MPAs, supported by the Scientific and Technical Body set by the BBNJ Agreement. Furthermore, members of the IFBs of high seas MPAs should enhance their EIA practices to ensure effective application of the BBNJ Agreement’s provisions in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Marine Science\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Marine Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1589936\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1589936","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一旦BBNJ协议生效,其环境影响评估(EIA)条款将适用于公海海洋保护区(mpa)。本文考察了四个公海海洋保护区的现行条约和实践,发现《联合国海洋法公约》(UNCLOS)中环境影响评估的规定是模糊的。然而,BBNJ协议反映了改善国家管辖范围以外地区(ABNJ)环境影响评估法律和实践的坚定承诺。尽管取得了这些进展,但在公海海洋保护区实施BBNJ协定的环境影响评估条款可能会遇到一些挑战。其中包括当公海海洋保护区的国际框架或机构(ifb)成员不批准该协定时可能出现的分裂,围绕“不破坏”附带条款的不确定性,以及“适当考虑”原则的模糊性。此外,《滨海保护区协定》下的信息交换所机制需要进一步发展,以便与公海海洋保护区的机构进行合作,而公海海洋保护区的环评标准、主题和程序分散,使确定与《滨海保护区协定》下的等效性复杂化。此外,环境影响评估对现有公海海洋保护区的规定似乎有限。值得一提的是,环境影响评估在公海海洋保护区的做法可能是不够的。本文针对上述挑战提出了几点建议:鼓励非缔约方适用BBNJ协议下的环境影响评估条款,对“不破坏”附带条款和“适当考虑”提出可能的解释或理解,通过BBNJ秘书处制定CL-HM,以及在BBNJ协议设立的科学和技术机构的支持下制定公海海洋保护区环境影响评估指南。此外,公海海洋保护区的ifb成员应加强其环境影响评估做法,以确保今后有效地实施《海洋保护区协定》的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of the environmental impact assessment provisions under the BBNJ Agreement in high seas marine protected area: challenges and suggestion
Once the BBNJ Agreement enters into force, its environmental impact assessment (EIA) provisions will apply to high seas marine protected areas (MPAs). This paper examines current treaties and practices within four high seas MPAs and finds that the EIA provisions established by United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) are ambiguous. The BBNJ Agreement, however, reflects a strong commitment to improving EIA laws and practices in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ). Despite this progress, several challenges may arise in implementing the BBNJ Agreement’s EIA provisions in high seas MPAs. These include potential fragmentation when members of the international frameworks or bodies (IFBs) of high seas MPAs do not ratify the agreement, uncertainties surrounding the “not undermine” proviso, and ambiguities in the “due regard” principle. Additionally, the Clearing-House Mechanism (Cl-HM) under the BBNJ Agreement requires further development to cooperate with the institutions of high seas MPAs, and the fragmented EIA standards, subjects and procedures for high seas MPAs complicate the determination of equivalency with those under the BBNJ Agreement. Moreover, the EIA provisions for existing high seas MPAs appear limited. It is worth mentioning that the practices of the EIA in high seas MPAs may not be sufficient. This paper offers several recommendations for the above challenges: encouraging non-Parties to apply the EIA provisions under the BBNJ Agreement, putting forward a possible interpretation or understanding for the “not undermine” proviso and “due regard”, developing the CL-HM through the BBNJ Secretariat, and developing EIA guidelines for high seas MPAs, supported by the Scientific and Technical Body set by the BBNJ Agreement. Furthermore, members of the IFBs of high seas MPAs should enhance their EIA practices to ensure effective application of the BBNJ Agreement’s provisions in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Marine Science
Frontiers in Marine Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
2443
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Marine Science publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of all aspects of the environment, biology, ecosystem functioning and human interactions with the oceans. Field Chief Editor Carlos M. Duarte at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, policy makers and the public worldwide. With the human population predicted to reach 9 billion people by 2050, it is clear that traditional land resources will not suffice to meet the demand for food or energy, required to support high-quality livelihoods. As a result, the oceans are emerging as a source of untapped assets, with new innovative industries, such as aquaculture, marine biotechnology, marine energy and deep-sea mining growing rapidly under a new era characterized by rapid growth of a blue, ocean-based economy. The sustainability of the blue economy is closely dependent on our knowledge about how to mitigate the impacts of the multiple pressures on the ocean ecosystem associated with the increased scale and diversification of industry operations in the ocean and global human pressures on the environment. Therefore, Frontiers in Marine Science particularly welcomes the communication of research outcomes addressing ocean-based solutions for the emerging challenges, including improved forecasting and observational capacities, understanding biodiversity and ecosystem problems, locally and globally, effective management strategies to maintain ocean health, and an improved capacity to sustainably derive resources from the oceans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信