国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会:2017-2018年周期世界报告

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Valerie L Baker, Silke Dyer, Georgina M Chambers, Elena Keller, Manish Banker, Jacques de Mouzon, Eman Elgindy, Fu M Bai, Osamu Ishihara, Seung Chik Jwa, Markus S Kupka, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, G David Adamson
{"title":"国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会:2017-2018年周期世界报告","authors":"Valerie L Baker, Silke Dyer, Georgina M Chambers, Elena Keller, Manish Banker, Jacques de Mouzon, Eman Elgindy, Fu M Bai, Osamu Ishihara, Seung Chik Jwa, Markus S Kupka, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, G David Adamson","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY QUESTION What were the rates of utilization, effectiveness, and safety for assisted reproductive technology (ART) throughout the world in 2017 and 2018, and what trends were observed? SUMMARY ANSWER The total reported number of ART fresh and frozen cycles conducted in 83 participating countries was 2 913 498 in 2017 and 3 303 505 in 2018, with 5-year trends including an increasing proportion of cycles utilizing frozen embryo transfer (FET) and an increasing number of cycles utilizing pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Prior reports from the International Committee Monitoring ART (ICMART) have reported on the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of ART from participating countries, with an increase in the number of cycles and number of participating countries over time. These reports have described regional differences in the utilization of ART overall, as well as differences in the utilization of specific practices such as ICSI, PGT and single embryo transfer. Past reports demonstrated that rates of delivery per cycle have increased and rates of multiple gestations have decreased over time. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective, cross-sectional survey describes ART procedures performed globally in 2017 and 2018. Data were submitted to ICMART by participating countries from national or regional registries. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS There were 83 countries which provided data for cycles performed in 2017 or 2018, with the majority of countries providing data for both years. Aggregate data are reported for each participating country and analysed using methods developed by ICMART to calculate measures of utilization, effectiveness, and safety. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 2 913 498 cycles and 671 012 babies born were reported for treatment performed in 2017, increasing to 3 303 505 cycles and 728 383 babies born for treatment performed in 2018. After imputing data for non-reporting centres in reporting countries, the estimated number of cycles performed in 2017 was 3 107 188 resulting in an estimated 814 588 babies. For 2018, the estimated number of cycles was 3 568 635 resulting in an estimated 870 814 babies. Utilization of ICSI for autologous fresh non-PGT cycles declined slightly compared with 2014 (54.6% in 2017 and 57.3% in 2018 compared with 64.8% in 2014). The percentage of transfers which were of frozen embryos was 55.7 % in 2017 and 57.9% in 2018, up from 38.9% in 2014. Among all countries, including those which reported no ‘freeze all’ cycles, the percentage of ‘freeze all’ cycles was 30.5% in 2017 and 32.7% in 2018, up from 13.1% in 2014. In countries reporting at least one retrieval cycle in which all embryos were frozen, the percentage of retrievals with no fresh embryo transfer increased (36.2% in 2017 and 36.8% in 2018, up from 20.1% in 2014). The number of PGT cycles in 2018 (172 247) was nearly 5-fold higher than the number reported in 2014 (36 512) with wide regional variation in utilization of PGT observed. In 2017, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.5% per oocyte retrieval, with a cumulative delivery rate of 36.4% per retrieval (excluding cycles which utilized PGT). The delivery rates per embryo transfer were 31.8% per autologous fresh transfer, 32.5% per autologous frozen transfer, and 47.3% per transfer after PGT. The delivery rate for transfers utilizing donor oocytes was 33.1% (combined fresh transfer and frozen transfers). In 2018, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.8% per oocyte retrieval, with a cumulative delivery rate of 37.3% per retrieval (excluding cycles which utilized PGT). The delivery rates per embryo transfer were 31.3% per autologous fresh transfer, 31.9% per autologous frozen transfer, and 48.4% per transfer after PGT. The delivery rate for transfers utilizing donor oocytes was 34.3%. The multiple delivery rate with autologous fresh transfer was 19.7% in 2017, and 18.3% in 2018. For autologous FET, the multiple delivery rate was 16.2% in 2017, and 14.9% in 2018. With oocyte donation (combined fresh and frozen embryo transfers), the multiple delivery rate was 15.9% in 2017, and 13.4% in 2018. Finally, the multiple delivery rate for cycles utilizing PGT was 6.9% in 2017 and 5.5% in 2018. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The data and analysis presented are dependent on the quality and completeness of the data submitted to ICMART, which varies globally. There is little data from the Middle East and some countries in Asia. It is important to note that delivery rates per transfer after PGT required the availability of embryos suitable for transfer, and therefore should not be interpreted as suggesting that PGT increases the overall success of ART per oocyte retrieval. Because of an updated methodology in the calculation of delivery rates and number of babies born, direct comparisons with past reports for these metrics cannot be made. Data are observational and it is not possible to determine the causes for regional differences in utilization, effectiveness, and safety, which are likely due at least in part to regional differences in socioeconomics, culture, resources, and regulations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The ICMART report is the most comprehensive summary of global ART utilization, effectiveness and safety, currently available. There remain regional disparities in the utilization of ART, suggesting differences in access to care. These data can be used by healthcare professionals, healthcare authorities, patients, and the general public to guide research, decision-making, and policy. The reasons behind regional differences in utilization and effectiveness need to be better understood and addressed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) ICMART received unrestricted grants from Abbott and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. ICMART also received financial support from the following organizations: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand; Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine; Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation; Red Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida; and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. ICMART appreciates the efforts of each of the participating countries and centres which provided data. Disclosures were provided by all authors, with none indicating a conflict of interest for this manuscript. V.L.B. provides an unpaid service as a regional representative for ICMART and is a former Board member of the Executive Council of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. S.D.: Ferring Pharmaceuticals provided an unrestricted grant paid to her institution in support of the African Registry and Network of ART (ANARA). Merck provided an honorarium for presentation at an educational symposium. ESHRE, the African Federation of Fertility Societies, the Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Medicine and Embryology, the Egyptian Fertility and Sterility Society, and the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction provided support for conference attendance as invited speakers (travel/accommodation). S.D. is a member of Science and Technology Advisory Group, HRP WHO, and received support from the WHO to attend the annual meeting. S.D. provides unpaid services as an ICMART Board member, Director of ANARA, and an Observer on the Board of the African Federation of Fertility Societies. G.M.C.: The National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit (NPESU) of the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney was contracted by ICMART to validate the ICMART data submission and prepare the statistics tables for this report. G.M.C. is the Director of the NPESU and a UNSW employee. G.M.C. is an unpaid board member of ICMART. E.K. is an employee of the NPESU and UNSW. M.B. has received honoraria from Abbott India, Ferring, Intas Pharmaceuticals, Merk Spec, and Organon. J.d.M. has nothing to report. E.E. has no disclosures to report. F.M.B. has no disclosures to report. O.I. has received honoraria for lectures from Ferring and Organon and is an unpaid Board member of ICMART. S.C.J. is on the advisory board of Ferring. M.S.K.: Ferring and Merck have paid consultancy fees, speaker and travel support. M.S.K. participates in EIM ESHRE, German IVF registry, and ICMART. F.Z.-H.: Ferring has paid travel expenses for attending a meeting organized by Ferring. F.Z.-H. is a Latin American Network of ART Founder and honorary member, an Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva Board member, Director of the Latin American Registry of ART, and a member of Comité de ética y Políticas Publicas Sociedad Chilena de Ginecologia ny Obstetricia. G.D.A. has received travel support from ESHRE to present the ICMART annual report, as the current chair of ICMART. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER n/a","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART): world report for cycles conducted in 2017–2018\",\"authors\":\"Valerie L Baker, Silke Dyer, Georgina M Chambers, Elena Keller, Manish Banker, Jacques de Mouzon, Eman Elgindy, Fu M Bai, Osamu Ishihara, Seung Chik Jwa, Markus S Kupka, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, G David Adamson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/humrep/deaf049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STUDY QUESTION What were the rates of utilization, effectiveness, and safety for assisted reproductive technology (ART) throughout the world in 2017 and 2018, and what trends were observed? SUMMARY ANSWER The total reported number of ART fresh and frozen cycles conducted in 83 participating countries was 2 913 498 in 2017 and 3 303 505 in 2018, with 5-year trends including an increasing proportion of cycles utilizing frozen embryo transfer (FET) and an increasing number of cycles utilizing pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Prior reports from the International Committee Monitoring ART (ICMART) have reported on the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of ART from participating countries, with an increase in the number of cycles and number of participating countries over time. These reports have described regional differences in the utilization of ART overall, as well as differences in the utilization of specific practices such as ICSI, PGT and single embryo transfer. Past reports demonstrated that rates of delivery per cycle have increased and rates of multiple gestations have decreased over time. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective, cross-sectional survey describes ART procedures performed globally in 2017 and 2018. Data were submitted to ICMART by participating countries from national or regional registries. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS There were 83 countries which provided data for cycles performed in 2017 or 2018, with the majority of countries providing data for both years. Aggregate data are reported for each participating country and analysed using methods developed by ICMART to calculate measures of utilization, effectiveness, and safety. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 2 913 498 cycles and 671 012 babies born were reported for treatment performed in 2017, increasing to 3 303 505 cycles and 728 383 babies born for treatment performed in 2018. After imputing data for non-reporting centres in reporting countries, the estimated number of cycles performed in 2017 was 3 107 188 resulting in an estimated 814 588 babies. For 2018, the estimated number of cycles was 3 568 635 resulting in an estimated 870 814 babies. Utilization of ICSI for autologous fresh non-PGT cycles declined slightly compared with 2014 (54.6% in 2017 and 57.3% in 2018 compared with 64.8% in 2014). The percentage of transfers which were of frozen embryos was 55.7 % in 2017 and 57.9% in 2018, up from 38.9% in 2014. Among all countries, including those which reported no ‘freeze all’ cycles, the percentage of ‘freeze all’ cycles was 30.5% in 2017 and 32.7% in 2018, up from 13.1% in 2014. In countries reporting at least one retrieval cycle in which all embryos were frozen, the percentage of retrievals with no fresh embryo transfer increased (36.2% in 2017 and 36.8% in 2018, up from 20.1% in 2014). The number of PGT cycles in 2018 (172 247) was nearly 5-fold higher than the number reported in 2014 (36 512) with wide regional variation in utilization of PGT observed. In 2017, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.5% per oocyte retrieval, with a cumulative delivery rate of 36.4% per retrieval (excluding cycles which utilized PGT). The delivery rates per embryo transfer were 31.8% per autologous fresh transfer, 32.5% per autologous frozen transfer, and 47.3% per transfer after PGT. The delivery rate for transfers utilizing donor oocytes was 33.1% (combined fresh transfer and frozen transfers). In 2018, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.8% per oocyte retrieval, with a cumulative delivery rate of 37.3% per retrieval (excluding cycles which utilized PGT). The delivery rates per embryo transfer were 31.3% per autologous fresh transfer, 31.9% per autologous frozen transfer, and 48.4% per transfer after PGT. The delivery rate for transfers utilizing donor oocytes was 34.3%. The multiple delivery rate with autologous fresh transfer was 19.7% in 2017, and 18.3% in 2018. For autologous FET, the multiple delivery rate was 16.2% in 2017, and 14.9% in 2018. With oocyte donation (combined fresh and frozen embryo transfers), the multiple delivery rate was 15.9% in 2017, and 13.4% in 2018. Finally, the multiple delivery rate for cycles utilizing PGT was 6.9% in 2017 and 5.5% in 2018. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The data and analysis presented are dependent on the quality and completeness of the data submitted to ICMART, which varies globally. There is little data from the Middle East and some countries in Asia. It is important to note that delivery rates per transfer after PGT required the availability of embryos suitable for transfer, and therefore should not be interpreted as suggesting that PGT increases the overall success of ART per oocyte retrieval. Because of an updated methodology in the calculation of delivery rates and number of babies born, direct comparisons with past reports for these metrics cannot be made. Data are observational and it is not possible to determine the causes for regional differences in utilization, effectiveness, and safety, which are likely due at least in part to regional differences in socioeconomics, culture, resources, and regulations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The ICMART report is the most comprehensive summary of global ART utilization, effectiveness and safety, currently available. There remain regional disparities in the utilization of ART, suggesting differences in access to care. These data can be used by healthcare professionals, healthcare authorities, patients, and the general public to guide research, decision-making, and policy. The reasons behind regional differences in utilization and effectiveness need to be better understood and addressed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) ICMART received unrestricted grants from Abbott and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. ICMART also received financial support from the following organizations: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand; Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine; Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation; Red Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida; and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. ICMART appreciates the efforts of each of the participating countries and centres which provided data. Disclosures were provided by all authors, with none indicating a conflict of interest for this manuscript. V.L.B. provides an unpaid service as a regional representative for ICMART and is a former Board member of the Executive Council of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. S.D.: Ferring Pharmaceuticals provided an unrestricted grant paid to her institution in support of the African Registry and Network of ART (ANARA). Merck provided an honorarium for presentation at an educational symposium. ESHRE, the African Federation of Fertility Societies, the Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Medicine and Embryology, the Egyptian Fertility and Sterility Society, and the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction provided support for conference attendance as invited speakers (travel/accommodation). S.D. is a member of Science and Technology Advisory Group, HRP WHO, and received support from the WHO to attend the annual meeting. S.D. provides unpaid services as an ICMART Board member, Director of ANARA, and an Observer on the Board of the African Federation of Fertility Societies. G.M.C.: The National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit (NPESU) of the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney was contracted by ICMART to validate the ICMART data submission and prepare the statistics tables for this report. G.M.C. is the Director of the NPESU and a UNSW employee. G.M.C. is an unpaid board member of ICMART. E.K. is an employee of the NPESU and UNSW. M.B. has received honoraria from Abbott India, Ferring, Intas Pharmaceuticals, Merk Spec, and Organon. J.d.M. has nothing to report. E.E. has no disclosures to report. F.M.B. has no disclosures to report. O.I. has received honoraria for lectures from Ferring and Organon and is an unpaid Board member of ICMART. S.C.J. is on the advisory board of Ferring. M.S.K.: Ferring and Merck have paid consultancy fees, speaker and travel support. M.S.K. participates in EIM ESHRE, German IVF registry, and ICMART. F.Z.-H.: Ferring has paid travel expenses for attending a meeting organized by Ferring. F.Z.-H. is a Latin American Network of ART Founder and honorary member, an Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva Board member, Director of the Latin American Registry of ART, and a member of Comité de ética y Políticas Publicas Sociedad Chilena de Ginecologia ny Obstetricia. G.D.A. has received travel support from ESHRE to present the ICMART annual report, as the current chair of ICMART. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER n/a\",\"PeriodicalId\":13003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf049\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年和2018年全球辅助生殖技术(ART)的使用率、有效性和安全性是什么?观察到什么趋势?83个参与国家报告的ART新鲜和冷冻周期总数在2017年为2913498例,在2018年为330505例,5年趋势包括使用冷冻胚胎移植(FET)的周期比例增加,使用植入前基因检测(PGT)的周期数量增加。国际ART监测委员会(ICMART)先前的报告报告了参与国ART的使用、有效性和安全性,随着时间的推移,周期和参与国的数量都在增加。这些报告描述了抗逆转录病毒技术总体应用的区域差异,以及ICSI、PGT和单胚胎移植等具体做法应用的差异。过去的报告表明,随着时间的推移,每个周期的分娩率有所增加,多胎妊娠率有所下降。本回顾性横断面调查描述了2017年和2018年在全球实施的ART手术。参加国从国家或区域登记处向ICMART提交了数据。参与者/材料、环境、方法有83个国家提供了2017年或2018年执行的周期数据,其中大多数国家提供了这两年的数据。报告每个参与国的汇总数据,并使用ICMART制定的方法进行分析,以计算利用率、有效性和安全性措施。2017年共有2 913 498个周期和671 012名新生儿报告接受治疗,2018年增加到3 303 505个周期和728 383名新生儿接受治疗。在对报告国家的非报告中心进行数据推算后,2017年进行的周期估计为3107 188次,导致婴儿估计为814 588名。2018年,估计周期数为3568635个,产生约870814名婴儿。与2014年相比,ICSI在自体新鲜非pgt周期中的使用率略有下降(2017年为54.6%,2018年为57.3%,而2014年为64.8%)。冷冻胚胎移植的比例从2014年的38.9%上升到2017年的55.7%和2018年的57.9%。在所有国家中,包括那些没有“冻结所有”周期的国家,2017年和2018年“冻结所有”周期的比例分别为30.5%和32.7%,高于2014年的13.1%。在报告至少有一个所有胚胎都冷冻的取出周期的国家,没有新鲜胚胎移植的取出比例增加了(2017年为36.2%,2018年为36.8%,高于2014年的20.1%)。2018年PGT循环次数(172 247次)比2014年报告的数量(36 512次)高出近5倍,PGT利用的区域差异很大。2017年,自体卵母细胞的产出率为23.5% /次,累计产出率为36.4% /次(不包括使用PGT的周期)。每次胚胎移植的产出率分别为自体新鲜移植31.8%、自体冷冻移植32.5%和PGT后47.3%。利用供体卵母细胞移植的分娩率为33.1%(结合新鲜移植和冷冻移植)。2018年,自体卵母细胞的产出率为23.8% /次,累计产出率为37.3% /次(不包括使用PGT的周期)。每次胚胎移植的产出率分别为自体新鲜移植31.3%、自体冷冻移植31.9%和PGT后移植48.4%。利用供体卵母细胞移植的产出率为34.3%。自体新鲜移植的多胎分娩率2017年为19.7%,2018年为18.3%。对于自体FET, 2017年的多次分娩率为16.2%,2018年为14.9%。通过卵母细胞捐赠(新鲜和冷冻胚胎联合移植),2017年多胎分娩率为15.9%,2018年为13.4%。最后,2017年使用PGT的周期多次交付率为6.9%,2018年为5.5%。所提供的数据和分析取决于提交给ICMART的数据的质量和完整性,这在全球范围内有所不同。中东和亚洲一些国家的数据很少。值得注意的是,PGT后每次移植的分娩率需要有适合移植的胚胎,因此不应被解释为PGT增加了每次获取卵母细胞的ART的总体成功率。由于计算分娩率和出生婴儿数量的方法更新,无法与过去的这些指标报告进行直接比较。 数据是观察性的,不可能确定在利用、有效性和安全性方面的区域差异的原因,这可能至少部分归因于社会经济、文化、资源和法规的区域差异。ICMART报告是目前可获得的全球ART使用、有效性和安全性最全面的总结。在抗逆转录病毒治疗的利用方面仍然存在区域差异,这表明在获得护理方面存在差异。医疗保健专业人员、医疗保健当局、患者和一般公众可以使用这些数据来指导研究、决策和政策。需要更好地了解和处理利用和效力方面的区域差异背后的原因。研究资金/竞争利益(S) ICMART获得了雅培和Ferring制药公司的无限制资助。ICMART还得到下列组织的财政支助:美国生殖医学学会;亚太生殖倡议;欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会;澳大利亚和新西兰生育学会;日本生殖医学学会;日本受精与着床学会;红色拉丁美洲Reproducción亚洲;以及辅助生殖技术协会。贸发会议赞赏每一个提供数据的参加国和中心所作的努力。所有作者都提供了信息披露,没有人表明这篇文章存在利益冲突。V.L.B.作为ICMART的区域代表提供无薪服务,并且是辅助生殖技术协会执行委员会的前董事会成员。s.d.: Ferring制药公司向她所在的机构提供了一笔无限制的赠款,以支持非洲抗逆转录病毒治疗登记和网络(ANARA)。默克公司为在一次教育研讨会上的演讲提供了酬金。ESHRE、非洲生育学会联合会、埃及生殖医学和胚胎学基金会、埃及生育和不育学会以及拉丁美洲辅助生殖网络作为特邀发言者提供了出席会议的支助(旅行/住宿)。世卫组织科学和技术咨询小组成员,并得到世卫组织的支持出席年会。S.D.作为ICMART董事会成员、ANARA董事和非洲生育协会联合会董事会观察员提供无偿服务。gmc: ICMART与悉尼新南威尔士大学(UNSW)的全国围产期流行病学和统计单位(NPESU)签订合同,验证ICMART提交的数据并为本报告准备统计表。G.M.C.是NPESU的董事,也是新南威尔士大学的员工。通用公司是ICMART的无薪董事会成员。E.K.是NPESU和新南威尔士大学的雇员。m.b.a.曾获得雅培印度、Ferring、Intas制药、Merk Spec和Organon的荣誉。j。d。m没什么可报告的。E.E.没有需要报告的信息。F.M.B.没有需要报告的信息。O.I.收到了费林和奥加农的讲学酬金,并且是ICMART的无薪董事会成员。S.C.J.是fering的顾问委员会成员。m.s.k.: fering和默克公司支付了咨询费、演讲费和差旅费。M.S.K.参与EIM ESHRE,德国试管婴儿注册和ICMART。F.Z.-H。Ferring为参加Ferring组织的会议支付了旅费。F.Z.-H。她是拉丁美洲抗逆转录病毒治疗网络的创始人和名誉成员,智利生殖医学研究所董事会成员,拉丁美洲抗逆转录病毒治疗登记处主任,以及Políticas智利生殖医学协会生殖医学分会委员会成员。作为ICMART的现任主席,g.d.a获得了ESHRE的旅行支持,以提交ICMART年度报告。试验注册号n/a
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART): world report for cycles conducted in 2017–2018
STUDY QUESTION What were the rates of utilization, effectiveness, and safety for assisted reproductive technology (ART) throughout the world in 2017 and 2018, and what trends were observed? SUMMARY ANSWER The total reported number of ART fresh and frozen cycles conducted in 83 participating countries was 2 913 498 in 2017 and 3 303 505 in 2018, with 5-year trends including an increasing proportion of cycles utilizing frozen embryo transfer (FET) and an increasing number of cycles utilizing pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Prior reports from the International Committee Monitoring ART (ICMART) have reported on the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of ART from participating countries, with an increase in the number of cycles and number of participating countries over time. These reports have described regional differences in the utilization of ART overall, as well as differences in the utilization of specific practices such as ICSI, PGT and single embryo transfer. Past reports demonstrated that rates of delivery per cycle have increased and rates of multiple gestations have decreased over time. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective, cross-sectional survey describes ART procedures performed globally in 2017 and 2018. Data were submitted to ICMART by participating countries from national or regional registries. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS There were 83 countries which provided data for cycles performed in 2017 or 2018, with the majority of countries providing data for both years. Aggregate data are reported for each participating country and analysed using methods developed by ICMART to calculate measures of utilization, effectiveness, and safety. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 2 913 498 cycles and 671 012 babies born were reported for treatment performed in 2017, increasing to 3 303 505 cycles and 728 383 babies born for treatment performed in 2018. After imputing data for non-reporting centres in reporting countries, the estimated number of cycles performed in 2017 was 3 107 188 resulting in an estimated 814 588 babies. For 2018, the estimated number of cycles was 3 568 635 resulting in an estimated 870 814 babies. Utilization of ICSI for autologous fresh non-PGT cycles declined slightly compared with 2014 (54.6% in 2017 and 57.3% in 2018 compared with 64.8% in 2014). The percentage of transfers which were of frozen embryos was 55.7 % in 2017 and 57.9% in 2018, up from 38.9% in 2014. Among all countries, including those which reported no ‘freeze all’ cycles, the percentage of ‘freeze all’ cycles was 30.5% in 2017 and 32.7% in 2018, up from 13.1% in 2014. In countries reporting at least one retrieval cycle in which all embryos were frozen, the percentage of retrievals with no fresh embryo transfer increased (36.2% in 2017 and 36.8% in 2018, up from 20.1% in 2014). The number of PGT cycles in 2018 (172 247) was nearly 5-fold higher than the number reported in 2014 (36 512) with wide regional variation in utilization of PGT observed. In 2017, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.5% per oocyte retrieval, with a cumulative delivery rate of 36.4% per retrieval (excluding cycles which utilized PGT). The delivery rates per embryo transfer were 31.8% per autologous fresh transfer, 32.5% per autologous frozen transfer, and 47.3% per transfer after PGT. The delivery rate for transfers utilizing donor oocytes was 33.1% (combined fresh transfer and frozen transfers). In 2018, the delivery rate for autologous oocytes was 23.8% per oocyte retrieval, with a cumulative delivery rate of 37.3% per retrieval (excluding cycles which utilized PGT). The delivery rates per embryo transfer were 31.3% per autologous fresh transfer, 31.9% per autologous frozen transfer, and 48.4% per transfer after PGT. The delivery rate for transfers utilizing donor oocytes was 34.3%. The multiple delivery rate with autologous fresh transfer was 19.7% in 2017, and 18.3% in 2018. For autologous FET, the multiple delivery rate was 16.2% in 2017, and 14.9% in 2018. With oocyte donation (combined fresh and frozen embryo transfers), the multiple delivery rate was 15.9% in 2017, and 13.4% in 2018. Finally, the multiple delivery rate for cycles utilizing PGT was 6.9% in 2017 and 5.5% in 2018. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The data and analysis presented are dependent on the quality and completeness of the data submitted to ICMART, which varies globally. There is little data from the Middle East and some countries in Asia. It is important to note that delivery rates per transfer after PGT required the availability of embryos suitable for transfer, and therefore should not be interpreted as suggesting that PGT increases the overall success of ART per oocyte retrieval. Because of an updated methodology in the calculation of delivery rates and number of babies born, direct comparisons with past reports for these metrics cannot be made. Data are observational and it is not possible to determine the causes for regional differences in utilization, effectiveness, and safety, which are likely due at least in part to regional differences in socioeconomics, culture, resources, and regulations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The ICMART report is the most comprehensive summary of global ART utilization, effectiveness and safety, currently available. There remain regional disparities in the utilization of ART, suggesting differences in access to care. These data can be used by healthcare professionals, healthcare authorities, patients, and the general public to guide research, decision-making, and policy. The reasons behind regional differences in utilization and effectiveness need to be better understood and addressed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) ICMART received unrestricted grants from Abbott and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. ICMART also received financial support from the following organizations: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand; Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine; Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation; Red Latinoamericana de Reproducción Asistida; and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. ICMART appreciates the efforts of each of the participating countries and centres which provided data. Disclosures were provided by all authors, with none indicating a conflict of interest for this manuscript. V.L.B. provides an unpaid service as a regional representative for ICMART and is a former Board member of the Executive Council of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. S.D.: Ferring Pharmaceuticals provided an unrestricted grant paid to her institution in support of the African Registry and Network of ART (ANARA). Merck provided an honorarium for presentation at an educational symposium. ESHRE, the African Federation of Fertility Societies, the Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Medicine and Embryology, the Egyptian Fertility and Sterility Society, and the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction provided support for conference attendance as invited speakers (travel/accommodation). S.D. is a member of Science and Technology Advisory Group, HRP WHO, and received support from the WHO to attend the annual meeting. S.D. provides unpaid services as an ICMART Board member, Director of ANARA, and an Observer on the Board of the African Federation of Fertility Societies. G.M.C.: The National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit (NPESU) of the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney was contracted by ICMART to validate the ICMART data submission and prepare the statistics tables for this report. G.M.C. is the Director of the NPESU and a UNSW employee. G.M.C. is an unpaid board member of ICMART. E.K. is an employee of the NPESU and UNSW. M.B. has received honoraria from Abbott India, Ferring, Intas Pharmaceuticals, Merk Spec, and Organon. J.d.M. has nothing to report. E.E. has no disclosures to report. F.M.B. has no disclosures to report. O.I. has received honoraria for lectures from Ferring and Organon and is an unpaid Board member of ICMART. S.C.J. is on the advisory board of Ferring. M.S.K.: Ferring and Merck have paid consultancy fees, speaker and travel support. M.S.K. participates in EIM ESHRE, German IVF registry, and ICMART. F.Z.-H.: Ferring has paid travel expenses for attending a meeting organized by Ferring. F.Z.-H. is a Latin American Network of ART Founder and honorary member, an Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva Board member, Director of the Latin American Registry of ART, and a member of Comité de ética y Políticas Publicas Sociedad Chilena de Ginecologia ny Obstetricia. G.D.A. has received travel support from ESHRE to present the ICMART annual report, as the current chair of ICMART. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER n/a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信