Christophe Willekens, Alexandre Bazinet, Samy Chraibi, Alex Bataller, Justine Decroocq, Naszrin Arani, Benjamin Carpentier, Caitlin Rausch, Delphine Lebon, Abhishek Maiti, Nicolas Gauthier, Nicholas Short, Sarah Bonnet, Koji Sasaki, Sabine Khalife-Hachem, Mahesh Swaminathan, Jean-Baptiste Micol, Florence Pasquier, Christophe Marzac, Damien Roos-Weil, Laurent Pascal, Naval Daver, Tapan Kadia, Didier Bouscary, Farhad Ravandi, Arnaud Pages, Hagop Kantarjian, Stéphane De Botton, Courtney DiNardo
{"title":"在新诊断的AML患者中,与低甲基化药物标准暴露相比,venetoclax暴露时间缩短至7天","authors":"Christophe Willekens, Alexandre Bazinet, Samy Chraibi, Alex Bataller, Justine Decroocq, Naszrin Arani, Benjamin Carpentier, Caitlin Rausch, Delphine Lebon, Abhishek Maiti, Nicolas Gauthier, Nicholas Short, Sarah Bonnet, Koji Sasaki, Sabine Khalife-Hachem, Mahesh Swaminathan, Jean-Baptiste Micol, Florence Pasquier, Christophe Marzac, Damien Roos-Weil, Laurent Pascal, Naval Daver, Tapan Kadia, Didier Bouscary, Farhad Ravandi, Arnaud Pages, Hagop Kantarjian, Stéphane De Botton, Courtney DiNardo","doi":"10.1038/s41408-025-01269-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hypomethylating agent (HMA) plus venetoclax (VEN) regimens are standard of care in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. While the VEN label recommends continuous 28-day cycles, shortened VEN durations may induce similar response rates and improve tolerability. It is unknown how a VEN exposure reduced to 7 days during cycles compares to standard HMA + VEN. We retrospectively compared newly diagnosed AML patients treated with azacitidine (AZA) x 7 days plus VEN x 7 days (“7 + 7” regimen) from the first cycle (<i>n</i> = 82) vs patients treated with standard dose HMA + VEN (std-HMA/VEN) (<i>n</i> = 166). Composite complete remission rate was similar between cohorts (72% vs 72%; <i>p</i> = 0.95) and a median number of cycles to best response was 2 with “7 + 7” vs 1 with std-HMA/VEN (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Concerning toxicity, platelet transfusion rates during cycle 1 as well as early mortality at 8-weeks (6% vs 16%; <i>p</i> = 0.03) were lower in “7 + 7” cohort. Finally, the median OS was 11.2 months (2-year 28%) with “7 + 7” vs 10.3 months (2-year 34%) with “std-HMA/VEN” (<i>p</i> = 0.75). In summary, acknowledging limitations of a retrospective comparison, a shortened course of VEN used for 7 days every 28 days resulted in similar response rates and survival when compared to standard VEN exposure.</p><figure></figure>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced venetoclax exposure to 7 days vs standard exposure with hypomethylating agents in newly diagnosed AML patients\",\"authors\":\"Christophe Willekens, Alexandre Bazinet, Samy Chraibi, Alex Bataller, Justine Decroocq, Naszrin Arani, Benjamin Carpentier, Caitlin Rausch, Delphine Lebon, Abhishek Maiti, Nicolas Gauthier, Nicholas Short, Sarah Bonnet, Koji Sasaki, Sabine Khalife-Hachem, Mahesh Swaminathan, Jean-Baptiste Micol, Florence Pasquier, Christophe Marzac, Damien Roos-Weil, Laurent Pascal, Naval Daver, Tapan Kadia, Didier Bouscary, Farhad Ravandi, Arnaud Pages, Hagop Kantarjian, Stéphane De Botton, Courtney DiNardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41408-025-01269-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hypomethylating agent (HMA) plus venetoclax (VEN) regimens are standard of care in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. While the VEN label recommends continuous 28-day cycles, shortened VEN durations may induce similar response rates and improve tolerability. It is unknown how a VEN exposure reduced to 7 days during cycles compares to standard HMA + VEN. We retrospectively compared newly diagnosed AML patients treated with azacitidine (AZA) x 7 days plus VEN x 7 days (“7 + 7” regimen) from the first cycle (<i>n</i> = 82) vs patients treated with standard dose HMA + VEN (std-HMA/VEN) (<i>n</i> = 166). Composite complete remission rate was similar between cohorts (72% vs 72%; <i>p</i> = 0.95) and a median number of cycles to best response was 2 with “7 + 7” vs 1 with std-HMA/VEN (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Concerning toxicity, platelet transfusion rates during cycle 1 as well as early mortality at 8-weeks (6% vs 16%; <i>p</i> = 0.03) were lower in “7 + 7” cohort. Finally, the median OS was 11.2 months (2-year 28%) with “7 + 7” vs 10.3 months (2-year 34%) with “std-HMA/VEN” (<i>p</i> = 0.75). In summary, acknowledging limitations of a retrospective comparison, a shortened course of VEN used for 7 days every 28 days resulted in similar response rates and survival when compared to standard VEN exposure.</p><figure></figure>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01269-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01269-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
低甲基化剂(HMA)加维妥乐(VEN)方案是不适合强化化疗的急性髓性白血病(AML)患者的标准治疗方案。虽然VEN标签建议连续28天的周期,缩短VEN持续时间可能会引起相似的反应率并提高耐受性。目前尚不清楚与标准HMA + VEN相比,在周期内VEN暴露如何减少到7天。我们回顾性比较了从第一个周期(n = 82)开始接受阿扎胞苷(AZA) x 7天+ VEN x 7天(“7 + 7”方案)治疗的新诊断AML患者与接受标准剂量HMA + VEN (std-HMA/VEN)治疗的患者(n = 166)。队列间的综合完全缓解率相似(72% vs 72%;p = 0.95),“7 + 7”组至最佳反应的中位周期数为2个,而std-HMA/VEN组为1个(p = 0.03)。关于毒性,第1周期血小板输注率和8周早期死亡率(6% vs 16%;P = 0.03)在“7 + 7”队列中较低。最后,“7 + 7”组的中位OS为11.2个月(2年28%),而“std-HMA/VEN”组的中位OS为10.3个月(2年34%)(p = 0.75)。总之,承认回顾性比较的局限性,与标准VEN暴露相比,每28天使用7天的VEN缩短疗程产生相似的缓解率和生存率。
Reduced venetoclax exposure to 7 days vs standard exposure with hypomethylating agents in newly diagnosed AML patients
Hypomethylating agent (HMA) plus venetoclax (VEN) regimens are standard of care in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. While the VEN label recommends continuous 28-day cycles, shortened VEN durations may induce similar response rates and improve tolerability. It is unknown how a VEN exposure reduced to 7 days during cycles compares to standard HMA + VEN. We retrospectively compared newly diagnosed AML patients treated with azacitidine (AZA) x 7 days plus VEN x 7 days (“7 + 7” regimen) from the first cycle (n = 82) vs patients treated with standard dose HMA + VEN (std-HMA/VEN) (n = 166). Composite complete remission rate was similar between cohorts (72% vs 72%; p = 0.95) and a median number of cycles to best response was 2 with “7 + 7” vs 1 with std-HMA/VEN (p = 0.03). Concerning toxicity, platelet transfusion rates during cycle 1 as well as early mortality at 8-weeks (6% vs 16%; p = 0.03) were lower in “7 + 7” cohort. Finally, the median OS was 11.2 months (2-year 28%) with “7 + 7” vs 10.3 months (2-year 34%) with “std-HMA/VEN” (p = 0.75). In summary, acknowledging limitations of a retrospective comparison, a shortened course of VEN used for 7 days every 28 days resulted in similar response rates and survival when compared to standard VEN exposure.
期刊介绍:
Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as:
Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights
Clinical trials and observations
Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies
Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics
Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.