BAO vs. SN暗能量演化的证据

IF 5.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Alessio Notari, Michele Redi and Andrea Tesi
{"title":"BAO vs. SN暗能量演化的证据","authors":"Alessio Notari, Michele Redi and Andrea Tesi","doi":"10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We critically review the evidence for time-varying dark energy from recent Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Supernova (SN) observations. First, we show that such evidence is present at the 3σ level, even without the new BAO data from the dark energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), by instead using BAO data from the dark energy Survey (DES), combined with the DES5Y supernovae and Planck CMB data. Next, we examine the role of the DES5Y supernova dataset, showing that the preference for time-varying dark energy is driven by the low redshift supernovae common to both the DES5Y and Pantheon+ compilations. We find that combining Pantheon+ and DES5Y supernovae by removing the common supernovae leads to two different results, depending on whether they are removed from the DES5Y or the Pantheon+ catalog, leading to stronger or weaker exclusion of ΛCDM, at the (3.8σ) and (2.5σ) level, respectively. These common supernovae have smaller error bars in DES5Y compared to Pantheon+, and, as recently pointed out, there is an offset in magnitude in DES5Y between supernovae at (z > 0.1), where almost all the measurements taken during the full five years of DES are, and the low-redshift ones (z < 0.1), where all the historical set of nearby supernovae lies. We show that marginalizing over such an offset in DES5Y would lead to significantly weaker evidence for evolving dark energy.","PeriodicalId":15445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BAO vs. SN evidence for evolving dark energy\",\"authors\":\"Alessio Notari, Michele Redi and Andrea Tesi\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We critically review the evidence for time-varying dark energy from recent Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Supernova (SN) observations. First, we show that such evidence is present at the 3σ level, even without the new BAO data from the dark energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), by instead using BAO data from the dark energy Survey (DES), combined with the DES5Y supernovae and Planck CMB data. Next, we examine the role of the DES5Y supernova dataset, showing that the preference for time-varying dark energy is driven by the low redshift supernovae common to both the DES5Y and Pantheon+ compilations. We find that combining Pantheon+ and DES5Y supernovae by removing the common supernovae leads to two different results, depending on whether they are removed from the DES5Y or the Pantheon+ catalog, leading to stronger or weaker exclusion of ΛCDM, at the (3.8σ) and (2.5σ) level, respectively. These common supernovae have smaller error bars in DES5Y compared to Pantheon+, and, as recently pointed out, there is an offset in magnitude in DES5Y between supernovae at (z > 0.1), where almost all the measurements taken during the full five years of DES are, and the low-redshift ones (z < 0.1), where all the historical set of nearby supernovae lies. We show that marginalizing over such an offset in DES5Y would lead to significantly weaker evidence for evolving dark energy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们从最近的重子声学振荡(BAO)和超新星(SN)观测中批判性地回顾了时变暗能量的证据。首先,我们通过使用暗能量巡天(DES)的BAO数据,结合DES5Y超新星和普朗克CMB数据,证明了即使没有暗能量光谱仪(DESI)的新BAO数据,这些证据也存在于3σ水平。接下来,我们研究了DES5Y超新星数据集的作用,表明对时变暗能量的偏好是由DES5Y和Pantheon+汇编中常见的低红移超新星驱动的。我们发现,通过移除共同超新星来组合Pantheon+和DES5Y超新星会导致两种不同的结果,这取决于它们是从DES5Y还是Pantheon+星表中移除,分别导致ΛCDM在(3.8σ)和(2.5σ)水平上的更强或更弱的排除。与万神殿+相比,这些常见的超新星在DES5Y中的误差条更小,而且,正如最近指出的那样,DES5Y中的超新星(z > 0.1)和低红移的超新星(z < 0.1)之间的星等存在偏移,在DES的整整五年里,几乎所有的测量都在这里,所有历史上附近的超新星都在这里。我们表明,在DES5Y中边缘化这样的偏移量将导致暗能量进化的证据明显减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BAO vs. SN evidence for evolving dark energy
We critically review the evidence for time-varying dark energy from recent Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Supernova (SN) observations. First, we show that such evidence is present at the 3σ level, even without the new BAO data from the dark energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), by instead using BAO data from the dark energy Survey (DES), combined with the DES5Y supernovae and Planck CMB data. Next, we examine the role of the DES5Y supernova dataset, showing that the preference for time-varying dark energy is driven by the low redshift supernovae common to both the DES5Y and Pantheon+ compilations. We find that combining Pantheon+ and DES5Y supernovae by removing the common supernovae leads to two different results, depending on whether they are removed from the DES5Y or the Pantheon+ catalog, leading to stronger or weaker exclusion of ΛCDM, at the (3.8σ) and (2.5σ) level, respectively. These common supernovae have smaller error bars in DES5Y compared to Pantheon+, and, as recently pointed out, there is an offset in magnitude in DES5Y between supernovae at (z > 0.1), where almost all the measurements taken during the full five years of DES are, and the low-redshift ones (z < 0.1), where all the historical set of nearby supernovae lies. We show that marginalizing over such an offset in DES5Y would lead to significantly weaker evidence for evolving dark energy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
23.40%
发文量
632
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (JCAP) encompasses theoretical, observational and experimental areas as well as computation and simulation. The journal covers the latest developments in the theory of all fundamental interactions and their cosmological implications (e.g. M-theory and cosmology, brane cosmology). JCAP''s coverage also includes topics such as formation, dynamics and clustering of galaxies, pre-galactic star formation, x-ray astronomy, radio astronomy, gravitational lensing, active galactic nuclei, intergalactic and interstellar matter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信