碳水化合物抗原19-9 δ函数预测交界性胰腺癌的生存。PANC-PALS联盟国际多中心衍生和验证研究。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jonathan Garnier,Alessio Marchetti,Brady Campbell,Paul C M Andel,Marie-Sophie Alfano,Camila Hidalgo Salinas,Eddy Traversari,Joseph R Habib,Gabriella Lionetto,Anaïs Palen,Jacques Ewald,Kelly Lafaro,Daniel Brock Hewitt,Richard A Burkhart,Salvatore Paiella,Greg D Sacks,Guiseppe Malleo,Christopher L Wolfgang,Roberto Salvia,Jin He,Olivier Turrini,Ammar A Javed
{"title":"碳水化合物抗原19-9 δ函数预测交界性胰腺癌的生存。PANC-PALS联盟国际多中心衍生和验证研究。","authors":"Jonathan Garnier,Alessio Marchetti,Brady Campbell,Paul C M Andel,Marie-Sophie Alfano,Camila Hidalgo Salinas,Eddy Traversari,Joseph R Habib,Gabriella Lionetto,Anaïs Palen,Jacques Ewald,Kelly Lafaro,Daniel Brock Hewitt,Richard A Burkhart,Salvatore Paiella,Greg D Sacks,Guiseppe Malleo,Christopher L Wolfgang,Roberto Salvia,Jin He,Olivier Turrini,Ammar A Javed","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo establish a novel method for evaluating carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and assess its role in predicting overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival in borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BR-PC).\r\n\r\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\r\nStatic CA19-9 values or percentage changes often fail to capture therapeutic responses in patients with BR-PC undergoing NAT. Improved evaluation methods are essential for guiding the treatment.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a retrospective multicenter study of patients who underwent BR-PC surgery. Two parameters were developed: slope coefficient (SC, change in CA19-9 divided by therapy duration) and mean δf (mδf, calculated as the sum of CA19-9 values over therapy intervals divided by the number of 15-day periods). The main objective was to correlate mδf with OS thresholds derived using a maximally selected log-rank statistic and validated in independent cohorts.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOverall, 991 patients (median age 65 [59-71] years; 49% male) were included. The thresholds for mδf were defined as U.mL-1. month-1 (negative SC) and U.mL-1. month-1 (positive SC). Patients with mδf below these thresholds had significantly better prognoses, with hazard ratios (HR) for OS (95% CI) of 0.6 (0.4-0.8; P<0.01) and 0.4 (0.2-0.9; P=0.04) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Both thresholds were validated for mOS, with 29 vs 22 months (P=0.015) and 32 vs 16 months (P=0.0034) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Similarly, the mDFS was 13 vs 10 months (P=0.011) and 12 vs 7 months (P=0.0018), respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis CA19-9 evaluation approach accurately predicts survival outcomes, offering a valuable tool for optimizing treatment strategies. An mδf calculator is available at https://www.pancpals.com/tools.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Delta Function for Survival Prediction in Borderline Pancreatic Cancer. A PANC-PALS Consortium International Multicenter Derivation and Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Garnier,Alessio Marchetti,Brady Campbell,Paul C M Andel,Marie-Sophie Alfano,Camila Hidalgo Salinas,Eddy Traversari,Joseph R Habib,Gabriella Lionetto,Anaïs Palen,Jacques Ewald,Kelly Lafaro,Daniel Brock Hewitt,Richard A Burkhart,Salvatore Paiella,Greg D Sacks,Guiseppe Malleo,Christopher L Wolfgang,Roberto Salvia,Jin He,Olivier Turrini,Ammar A Javed\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/sla.0000000000006735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo establish a novel method for evaluating carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and assess its role in predicting overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival in borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BR-PC).\\r\\n\\r\\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\\r\\nStatic CA19-9 values or percentage changes often fail to capture therapeutic responses in patients with BR-PC undergoing NAT. Improved evaluation methods are essential for guiding the treatment.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis was a retrospective multicenter study of patients who underwent BR-PC surgery. Two parameters were developed: slope coefficient (SC, change in CA19-9 divided by therapy duration) and mean δf (mδf, calculated as the sum of CA19-9 values over therapy intervals divided by the number of 15-day periods). The main objective was to correlate mδf with OS thresholds derived using a maximally selected log-rank statistic and validated in independent cohorts.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOverall, 991 patients (median age 65 [59-71] years; 49% male) were included. The thresholds for mδf were defined as U.mL-1. month-1 (negative SC) and U.mL-1. month-1 (positive SC). Patients with mδf below these thresholds had significantly better prognoses, with hazard ratios (HR) for OS (95% CI) of 0.6 (0.4-0.8; P<0.01) and 0.4 (0.2-0.9; P=0.04) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Both thresholds were validated for mOS, with 29 vs 22 months (P=0.015) and 32 vs 16 months (P=0.0034) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Similarly, the mDFS was 13 vs 10 months (P=0.011) and 12 vs 7 months (P=0.0018), respectively.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThis CA19-9 evaluation approach accurately predicts survival outcomes, offering a valuable tool for optimizing treatment strategies. An mδf calculator is available at https://www.pancpals.com/tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006735\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006735","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的建立一种新辅助治疗(NAT)中碳水化合物抗原19-9 (CA19-9)的评估方法,并评估其在预测边缘性可切除胰腺腺癌(BR-PC)总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)中的作用。数据统计的CA19-9值或百分比变化往往不能反映BR-PC患者行NAT的治疗反应。改进的评估方法对于指导治疗至关重要。方法对BR-PC手术患者进行回顾性多中心研究。开发了两个参数:斜率系数(SC, CA19-9的变化除以治疗时间)和平均δf (mδf,计算方法为CA19-9值在治疗间隔内的总和除以15天的疗程数)。主要目的是将mδf与OS阈值关联起来,该阈值使用最大选择的对数秩统计量得出,并在独立队列中进行验证。结果991例患者(中位年龄65[59-71]岁;(49%为男性)。mδf的阈值定义为uml -1。第1个月(阴性SC)和U.mL-1。第1个月(SC阳性)。mδf低于这些阈值的患者预后明显更好,OS的风险比(HR) (95% CI)为0.6 (0.4-0.8;P<0.01)和0.4 (0.2 ~ 0.9;P=0.04)。这两个阈值都对mOS进行了验证,阴性和阳性SC分别为29个月和22个月(P=0.015)和32个月和16个月(P=0.0034)。同样,mDFS分别为13个月vs 10个月(P=0.011)和12个月vs 7个月(P=0.0018)。结论该CA19-9评价方法可准确预测生存结果,为优化治疗策略提供了有价值的工具。一个mδf计算器可以在https://www.pancpals.com/tools上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Delta Function for Survival Prediction in Borderline Pancreatic Cancer. A PANC-PALS Consortium International Multicenter Derivation and Validation Study.
OBJECTIVE To establish a novel method for evaluating carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and assess its role in predicting overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival in borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BR-PC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Static CA19-9 values or percentage changes often fail to capture therapeutic responses in patients with BR-PC undergoing NAT. Improved evaluation methods are essential for guiding the treatment. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study of patients who underwent BR-PC surgery. Two parameters were developed: slope coefficient (SC, change in CA19-9 divided by therapy duration) and mean δf (mδf, calculated as the sum of CA19-9 values over therapy intervals divided by the number of 15-day periods). The main objective was to correlate mδf with OS thresholds derived using a maximally selected log-rank statistic and validated in independent cohorts. RESULTS Overall, 991 patients (median age 65 [59-71] years; 49% male) were included. The thresholds for mδf were defined as U.mL-1. month-1 (negative SC) and U.mL-1. month-1 (positive SC). Patients with mδf below these thresholds had significantly better prognoses, with hazard ratios (HR) for OS (95% CI) of 0.6 (0.4-0.8; P<0.01) and 0.4 (0.2-0.9; P=0.04) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Both thresholds were validated for mOS, with 29 vs 22 months (P=0.015) and 32 vs 16 months (P=0.0034) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Similarly, the mDFS was 13 vs 10 months (P=0.011) and 12 vs 7 months (P=0.0018), respectively. CONCLUSION This CA19-9 evaluation approach accurately predicts survival outcomes, offering a valuable tool for optimizing treatment strategies. An mδf calculator is available at https://www.pancpals.com/tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信