尤因肉瘤切除术中应停止评估术中冷冻切片骨髓边缘吗?

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Stephen W Chenard,Akhil Rekulapelli,Rachel B Mersfelder,Hakmook Kang,Jennifer L Halpern,Herbert S Schwartz,Ginger E Holt,Reena Singh,Scott C Borinstein,Joshua M Lawrenz
{"title":"尤因肉瘤切除术中应停止评估术中冷冻切片骨髓边缘吗?","authors":"Stephen W Chenard,Akhil Rekulapelli,Rachel B Mersfelder,Hakmook Kang,Jennifer L Halpern,Herbert S Schwartz,Ginger E Holt,Reena Singh,Scott C Borinstein,Joshua M Lawrenz","doi":"10.1097/corr.0000000000003497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nEwing sarcoma is a rare and highly aggressive pediatric bone cancer that is histologically composed of small, round blue cells. These histologic findings can make it difficult to assess intraoperative frozen section bone marrow margins because the bone marrow that regenerates after preoperative chemotherapy has a similar appearance, especially on frozen section analysis. Prior studies have more broadly questioned the utility of intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins using frozen sections during the resection of bone sarcomas; however, to our knowledge, no prior study has specifically characterized the accuracy or clinical utility of evaluating bone marrow margins on frozen sections during long bone Ewing sarcoma resection.\r\n\r\nQUESTIONS/PURPOSES\r\n(1) How accurate is the assessment of intraoperative bone marrow margins using frozen sections during the resection of long bone Ewing sarcoma? (2) What changes to the prespecified surgical plan were made in response to positive intraoperative assessments of bone marrow margins? (3) Is intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins on frozen sections associated with improved survival free from local recurrence, development of metastatic disease, or Ewing sarcoma-specific death?\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nSixty-four patients who underwent primary resection of a conventional Ewing sarcoma of a long bone at our institution were analyzed. In this cohort, 81% (52 of 64) of patients had frozen bone marrow margins assessed intraoperatively. There were no identifiable reasons for why some patients had or did not have a frozen section performed, and we could not detect differences in demographic or surgical features between patients who did versus those who did not have intraoperative margins assessed. Intraoperative margins were assessed as negative on frozen sections in 88% (46 of 52) of patients and positive in the remaining 12% (6 of 52) of patients. To determine the rates of false-positive and false-negative intraoperative assessments, the results of intraoperative frozen sections were compared with the assessments of those same initial intraoperative margins as reviewed on final pathology reports. In patients with positive intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins on frozen sections, we reviewed the surgical records and operative notes to determine whether additional bony resection was performed or if any other changes were made to the prespecified operative plan as a result of the concern for a positive intraoperative margin. Data were available on all study endpoints in 86% (55 of 64) of patients at a minimum follow-up time of 2 years. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare survival free from local recurrence, development of metastatic disease, and Ewing sarcoma-specific death between patients with intraoperative margin assessment and those without. We also compared these same oncologic outcomes between patients whose margins were called positive versus negative intraoperatively.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAll bone marrow margins that were assessed as negative on intraoperative frozen sections were confirmed to be negative when examined on final pathology reports (100% [46 of 46]). All bone marrow margins that were assessed as positive on intraoperative frozen sections were actually negative when the same tissue margins were examined on final pathology results (6 of 6) and confirmed by re-review by an experienced bone pathologist for this study. Five of those six patients had an additional, unnecessary bone resection; in the sixth patient, the orthopaedic surgeon documented a high suspicion for false-positive intraoperative assessment and did not perform additional resection. When comparing patients who had an intraoperative margin assessed by frozen section versus those who did not, there were no differences in local recurrence-free survival at 2 years (93% [95% confidence interval (CI) 81% to 99%] versus 100% [95% CI 72% to 100%]; p = 0.99), development of metastatic disease-free survival at 2 years (85% [95% CI 71% to 94%] versus 78% [95% CI 40% to 97%]; p = 0.62), or Ewing sarcoma-specific death-free survival at 2 years (91% [95% CI 78% to 97%] versus 100% [66% to 100%]; p = 0.99). Similarly, when comparing patients whose margins were true negatives versus false positives intraoperatively, there were no differences in local recurrence-free survival at 2 years (92% [95% CI 79% to 98%] versus 100% [95% CI 54% to 100%]; p = 0.99), development of metastatic disease-free survival at 2 years (86% [95% CI 71% to 95%] versus 80% [95% CI 28% to 99%]; p = 0.56), or Ewing sarcoma-specific death-free survival at 2 years (90% [95% CI 77% to 97%] versus 100% [95% CI 54% to 100%]; p = 0.99).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nDuring long bone Ewing sarcoma resection, in a study of our patients, routine assessment of intraoperative bone marrow margins on frozen sections appears to provide no demonstrable clinical benefit and may lead to excessive resection of normal bone. If an orthopaedic surgeon has a specific concern for a positive bone marrow margin, then an intraoperative frozen section may certainly still be warranted. However, in the era of modern MRI imaging, routine intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins using frozen sections is likely unnecessary in this setting and may be omitted to save time and cost.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nLevel III, diagnostic study.","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should We Stop Assessing Intraoperative Frozen Section Marrow Margins During Ewing Sarcoma Resection?\",\"authors\":\"Stephen W Chenard,Akhil Rekulapelli,Rachel B Mersfelder,Hakmook Kang,Jennifer L Halpern,Herbert S Schwartz,Ginger E Holt,Reena Singh,Scott C Borinstein,Joshua M Lawrenz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/corr.0000000000003497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nEwing sarcoma is a rare and highly aggressive pediatric bone cancer that is histologically composed of small, round blue cells. These histologic findings can make it difficult to assess intraoperative frozen section bone marrow margins because the bone marrow that regenerates after preoperative chemotherapy has a similar appearance, especially on frozen section analysis. Prior studies have more broadly questioned the utility of intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins using frozen sections during the resection of bone sarcomas; however, to our knowledge, no prior study has specifically characterized the accuracy or clinical utility of evaluating bone marrow margins on frozen sections during long bone Ewing sarcoma resection.\\r\\n\\r\\nQUESTIONS/PURPOSES\\r\\n(1) How accurate is the assessment of intraoperative bone marrow margins using frozen sections during the resection of long bone Ewing sarcoma? (2) What changes to the prespecified surgical plan were made in response to positive intraoperative assessments of bone marrow margins? (3) Is intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins on frozen sections associated with improved survival free from local recurrence, development of metastatic disease, or Ewing sarcoma-specific death?\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nSixty-four patients who underwent primary resection of a conventional Ewing sarcoma of a long bone at our institution were analyzed. In this cohort, 81% (52 of 64) of patients had frozen bone marrow margins assessed intraoperatively. There were no identifiable reasons for why some patients had or did not have a frozen section performed, and we could not detect differences in demographic or surgical features between patients who did versus those who did not have intraoperative margins assessed. Intraoperative margins were assessed as negative on frozen sections in 88% (46 of 52) of patients and positive in the remaining 12% (6 of 52) of patients. To determine the rates of false-positive and false-negative intraoperative assessments, the results of intraoperative frozen sections were compared with the assessments of those same initial intraoperative margins as reviewed on final pathology reports. In patients with positive intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins on frozen sections, we reviewed the surgical records and operative notes to determine whether additional bony resection was performed or if any other changes were made to the prespecified operative plan as a result of the concern for a positive intraoperative margin. Data were available on all study endpoints in 86% (55 of 64) of patients at a minimum follow-up time of 2 years. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare survival free from local recurrence, development of metastatic disease, and Ewing sarcoma-specific death between patients with intraoperative margin assessment and those without. We also compared these same oncologic outcomes between patients whose margins were called positive versus negative intraoperatively.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAll bone marrow margins that were assessed as negative on intraoperative frozen sections were confirmed to be negative when examined on final pathology reports (100% [46 of 46]). All bone marrow margins that were assessed as positive on intraoperative frozen sections were actually negative when the same tissue margins were examined on final pathology results (6 of 6) and confirmed by re-review by an experienced bone pathologist for this study. Five of those six patients had an additional, unnecessary bone resection; in the sixth patient, the orthopaedic surgeon documented a high suspicion for false-positive intraoperative assessment and did not perform additional resection. When comparing patients who had an intraoperative margin assessed by frozen section versus those who did not, there were no differences in local recurrence-free survival at 2 years (93% [95% confidence interval (CI) 81% to 99%] versus 100% [95% CI 72% to 100%]; p = 0.99), development of metastatic disease-free survival at 2 years (85% [95% CI 71% to 94%] versus 78% [95% CI 40% to 97%]; p = 0.62), or Ewing sarcoma-specific death-free survival at 2 years (91% [95% CI 78% to 97%] versus 100% [66% to 100%]; p = 0.99). Similarly, when comparing patients whose margins were true negatives versus false positives intraoperatively, there were no differences in local recurrence-free survival at 2 years (92% [95% CI 79% to 98%] versus 100% [95% CI 54% to 100%]; p = 0.99), development of metastatic disease-free survival at 2 years (86% [95% CI 71% to 95%] versus 80% [95% CI 28% to 99%]; p = 0.56), or Ewing sarcoma-specific death-free survival at 2 years (90% [95% CI 77% to 97%] versus 100% [95% CI 54% to 100%]; p = 0.99).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nDuring long bone Ewing sarcoma resection, in a study of our patients, routine assessment of intraoperative bone marrow margins on frozen sections appears to provide no demonstrable clinical benefit and may lead to excessive resection of normal bone. If an orthopaedic surgeon has a specific concern for a positive bone marrow margin, then an intraoperative frozen section may certainly still be warranted. However, in the era of modern MRI imaging, routine intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins using frozen sections is likely unnecessary in this setting and may be omitted to save time and cost.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nLevel III, diagnostic study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000003497\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000003497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

露珠肉瘤是一种罕见且高度侵袭性的儿童骨癌,组织学上由小而圆的蓝色细胞组成。这些组织学发现使得术中冷冻切片骨髓边缘难以评估,因为术前化疗后再生的骨髓具有相似的外观,特别是在冷冻切片分析中。先前的研究更广泛地质疑在骨肉瘤切除术中使用冷冻切片术中评估骨髓边缘的实用性;然而,据我们所知,没有先前的研究明确描述了在长骨尤因肉瘤切除术中使用冷冻切片评估骨髓边界的准确性或临床实用性。(1)在长骨尤因肉瘤切除术中使用冷冻切片评估术中骨髓边界的准确性有多高?(2)术中骨髓边缘评估阳性后,对预先设定的手术计划有何改变?(3)术中评估冷冻切片的骨髓边缘是否与无局部复发、转移性疾病发展或尤因肉瘤特异性死亡的生存率提高相关?方法对我院64例行常规长骨尤文氏肉瘤一期切除术的患者进行分析。在该队列中,81%(64例中的52例)的患者术中评估了冷冻骨髓边缘。没有明确的原因可以解释为什么有些患者进行了冷冻切片或没有进行冷冻切片,我们也无法发现进行冷冻切片的患者与未进行术中切缘评估的患者在人口统计学或外科特征上的差异。88%的患者(52例中的46例)术中冰冻切片边缘被评估为阴性,其余12%的患者(52例中的6例)术中边缘被评估为阳性。为了确定术中评估假阳性和假阴性的比率,将术中冷冻切片的结果与最终病理报告中相同的初始术中边缘的评估进行比较。对于术中冷冻切片骨髓切缘阳性的患者,我们回顾了手术记录和手术记录,以确定是否进行了额外的骨切除,或者是否由于术中切缘阳性而对预先规定的手术计划进行了任何其他更改。在至少2年的随访时间内,86%(64名患者中的55名)的所有研究终点均可获得数据。Kaplan-Meier曲线和log-rank检验用于比较进行术中切缘评估和未进行术中切缘评估的患者之间无局部复发、转移性疾病发展和尤因肉瘤特异性死亡的生存率。我们还比较了术中边缘呈阳性和阴性的患者的相同肿瘤预后。结果所有术中冷冻切片评估为阴性的骨髓边缘在最终病理报告中被证实为阴性(100%[46 / 46])。所有在术中冷冻切片上被评估为阳性的骨髓边缘,在最终病理结果(6 / 6)检查相同组织边缘时,实际上是阴性的,并经本研究经验丰富的骨病理学家重新检查确认。这6名患者中有5名进行了额外的、不必要的骨切除术;在第6例患者中,骨科医生对术中假阳性评估有很高的怀疑,并没有进行额外的切除。当比较采用冷冻切片评估术中切缘的患者与未采用冷冻切片评估术中切缘的患者时,2年局部无复发生存率无差异(93%[95%置信区间(CI) 81%至99%]与100% [95% CI 72%至100%];p = 0.99), 2年无转移性疾病生存率(85% [95% CI 71% ~ 94%] vs . 78% [95% CI 40% ~ 97%];p = 0.62),或2年尤文氏肉瘤特异性无死亡生存率(91% [95% CI 78% - 97%]对100% [66% - 100%];P = 0.99)。同样,当比较术中切缘为真阴性和假阳性的患者时,2年的局部无复发生存率没有差异(92% [95% CI 79%至98%]对100% [95% CI 54%至100%];p = 0.99), 2年无转移性疾病生存率(86% [95% CI 71% ~ 95%] vs . 80% [95% CI 28% ~ 99%];p = 0.56),或2年尤文氏肉瘤特异性无死亡生存率(90% [95% CI 77% - 97%]对100% [95% CI 54% - 100%];P = 0.99)。结论:在我们对患者的一项研究中,在长骨尤文氏肉瘤切除术中,术中常规评估冷冻切片骨髓边缘似乎没有明显的临床益处,并可能导致正常骨的过度切除。 如果矫形外科医生对骨髓边缘阳性有特殊的担忧,那么术中冷冻切片可能仍然是必要的。然而,在现代MRI成像时代,在这种情况下,使用冷冻切片对骨髓边缘进行常规术中评估可能是不必要的,为了节省时间和成本,可以省略。证据等级:诊断性研究III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should We Stop Assessing Intraoperative Frozen Section Marrow Margins During Ewing Sarcoma Resection?
BACKGROUND Ewing sarcoma is a rare and highly aggressive pediatric bone cancer that is histologically composed of small, round blue cells. These histologic findings can make it difficult to assess intraoperative frozen section bone marrow margins because the bone marrow that regenerates after preoperative chemotherapy has a similar appearance, especially on frozen section analysis. Prior studies have more broadly questioned the utility of intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins using frozen sections during the resection of bone sarcomas; however, to our knowledge, no prior study has specifically characterized the accuracy or clinical utility of evaluating bone marrow margins on frozen sections during long bone Ewing sarcoma resection. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) How accurate is the assessment of intraoperative bone marrow margins using frozen sections during the resection of long bone Ewing sarcoma? (2) What changes to the prespecified surgical plan were made in response to positive intraoperative assessments of bone marrow margins? (3) Is intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins on frozen sections associated with improved survival free from local recurrence, development of metastatic disease, or Ewing sarcoma-specific death? METHODS Sixty-four patients who underwent primary resection of a conventional Ewing sarcoma of a long bone at our institution were analyzed. In this cohort, 81% (52 of 64) of patients had frozen bone marrow margins assessed intraoperatively. There were no identifiable reasons for why some patients had or did not have a frozen section performed, and we could not detect differences in demographic or surgical features between patients who did versus those who did not have intraoperative margins assessed. Intraoperative margins were assessed as negative on frozen sections in 88% (46 of 52) of patients and positive in the remaining 12% (6 of 52) of patients. To determine the rates of false-positive and false-negative intraoperative assessments, the results of intraoperative frozen sections were compared with the assessments of those same initial intraoperative margins as reviewed on final pathology reports. In patients with positive intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins on frozen sections, we reviewed the surgical records and operative notes to determine whether additional bony resection was performed or if any other changes were made to the prespecified operative plan as a result of the concern for a positive intraoperative margin. Data were available on all study endpoints in 86% (55 of 64) of patients at a minimum follow-up time of 2 years. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare survival free from local recurrence, development of metastatic disease, and Ewing sarcoma-specific death between patients with intraoperative margin assessment and those without. We also compared these same oncologic outcomes between patients whose margins were called positive versus negative intraoperatively. RESULTS All bone marrow margins that were assessed as negative on intraoperative frozen sections were confirmed to be negative when examined on final pathology reports (100% [46 of 46]). All bone marrow margins that were assessed as positive on intraoperative frozen sections were actually negative when the same tissue margins were examined on final pathology results (6 of 6) and confirmed by re-review by an experienced bone pathologist for this study. Five of those six patients had an additional, unnecessary bone resection; in the sixth patient, the orthopaedic surgeon documented a high suspicion for false-positive intraoperative assessment and did not perform additional resection. When comparing patients who had an intraoperative margin assessed by frozen section versus those who did not, there were no differences in local recurrence-free survival at 2 years (93% [95% confidence interval (CI) 81% to 99%] versus 100% [95% CI 72% to 100%]; p = 0.99), development of metastatic disease-free survival at 2 years (85% [95% CI 71% to 94%] versus 78% [95% CI 40% to 97%]; p = 0.62), or Ewing sarcoma-specific death-free survival at 2 years (91% [95% CI 78% to 97%] versus 100% [66% to 100%]; p = 0.99). Similarly, when comparing patients whose margins were true negatives versus false positives intraoperatively, there were no differences in local recurrence-free survival at 2 years (92% [95% CI 79% to 98%] versus 100% [95% CI 54% to 100%]; p = 0.99), development of metastatic disease-free survival at 2 years (86% [95% CI 71% to 95%] versus 80% [95% CI 28% to 99%]; p = 0.56), or Ewing sarcoma-specific death-free survival at 2 years (90% [95% CI 77% to 97%] versus 100% [95% CI 54% to 100%]; p = 0.99). CONCLUSION During long bone Ewing sarcoma resection, in a study of our patients, routine assessment of intraoperative bone marrow margins on frozen sections appears to provide no demonstrable clinical benefit and may lead to excessive resection of normal bone. If an orthopaedic surgeon has a specific concern for a positive bone marrow margin, then an intraoperative frozen section may certainly still be warranted. However, in the era of modern MRI imaging, routine intraoperative assessment of bone marrow margins using frozen sections is likely unnecessary in this setting and may be omitted to save time and cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, diagnostic study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
722
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge. CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信