{"title":"种群博弈中的进化稳定策略:一个入侵者的视角","authors":"Felipe A. Murgel , Max O. Souza","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2025.112108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We revisit the various definitions of an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (<span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span>) in nonlinear population games from the standpoint of barrier functions. We show the equivalence between an <span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span> being uniformly uninvadable and the corresponding barrier function being lower semi-continuous (LSC). Moreover, it is sufficient to check this for strategies that are near an alternative best reply lying on an opposite face. We also provide some counterexamples that show that uniform stability cannot be taken for granted in nonlinear population games; we denote such <span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span>s as singular <span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span>s. Furthermore, we obtain conditions that are equivalent to the barrier function being LSC and are typically easier to verify. As a by-product, we identify a number of instances where being an <span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span> is equivalent to being uniformly uninvadable: 3-player games, payoffs inducing convex incentives, or differentiable payoffs with negative definite first derivative, when considered on alternative best replies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","volume":"607 ","pages":"Article 112108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolutionarily stable strategies in population games: An invader’s perspective\",\"authors\":\"Felipe A. Murgel , Max O. Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtbi.2025.112108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We revisit the various definitions of an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (<span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span>) in nonlinear population games from the standpoint of barrier functions. We show the equivalence between an <span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span> being uniformly uninvadable and the corresponding barrier function being lower semi-continuous (LSC). Moreover, it is sufficient to check this for strategies that are near an alternative best reply lying on an opposite face. We also provide some counterexamples that show that uniform stability cannot be taken for granted in nonlinear population games; we denote such <span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span>s as singular <span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span>s. Furthermore, we obtain conditions that are equivalent to the barrier function being LSC and are typically easier to verify. As a by-product, we identify a number of instances where being an <span><math><mi>ESS</mi></math></span> is equivalent to being uniformly uninvadable: 3-player games, payoffs inducing convex incentives, or differentiable payoffs with negative definite first derivative, when considered on alternative best replies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theoretical Biology\",\"volume\":\"607 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theoretical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519325000748\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519325000748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evolutionarily stable strategies in population games: An invader’s perspective
We revisit the various definitions of an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy () in nonlinear population games from the standpoint of barrier functions. We show the equivalence between an being uniformly uninvadable and the corresponding barrier function being lower semi-continuous (LSC). Moreover, it is sufficient to check this for strategies that are near an alternative best reply lying on an opposite face. We also provide some counterexamples that show that uniform stability cannot be taken for granted in nonlinear population games; we denote such s as singular s. Furthermore, we obtain conditions that are equivalent to the barrier function being LSC and are typically easier to verify. As a by-product, we identify a number of instances where being an is equivalent to being uniformly uninvadable: 3-player games, payoffs inducing convex incentives, or differentiable payoffs with negative definite first derivative, when considered on alternative best replies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Theoretical Biology is the leading forum for theoretical perspectives that give insight into biological processes. It covers a very wide range of topics and is of interest to biologists in many areas of research, including:
• Brain and Neuroscience
• Cancer Growth and Treatment
• Cell Biology
• Developmental Biology
• Ecology
• Evolution
• Immunology,
• Infectious and non-infectious Diseases,
• Mathematical, Computational, Biophysical and Statistical Modeling
• Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry
• Networks and Complex Systems
• Physiology
• Pharmacodynamics
• Animal Behavior and Game Theory
Acceptable papers are those that bear significant importance on the biology per se being presented, and not on the mathematical analysis. Papers that include some data or experimental material bearing on theory will be considered, including those that contain comparative study, statistical data analysis, mathematical proof, computer simulations, experiments, field observations, or even philosophical arguments, which are all methods to support or reject theoretical ideas. However, there should be a concerted effort to make papers intelligible to biologists in the chosen field.