Madeline G. Williams, Zachary J. Faber, Thomas J. Kelley
{"title":"人工智能图像处理与人工白细胞鉴别评分小鼠囊性纤维化感染模型中免疫细胞浸润的比较","authors":"Madeline G. Williams, Zachary J. Faber, Thomas J. Kelley","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Immune cell differentials are most commonly performed manually or with the use of automated cell sorting devices. However, manual review by research personnel can be both subjective and time consuming, and cell sorting approaches consume samples and demand additional reagents to perform the differential. We have created an artificial intelligence (AI) image processing pipeline using the Biodock.ai platform to classify immune cell types from Giemsa-stained cytospins of mouse bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Through multiple rounds of training and refinement, we have created a tool that is as accurate as manual review of slide images while removing the subjectivity and making the process mostly hands off, saving researcher time for other tasks and improving core turnaround for experiments.</div><div>This AI-based image processing is directly compatible with current workflows utilizing stained slides, in contrast to a change to a flow cytometry-based approach, which requires both specialized equipment, reagents, and expertise.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of artificial intelligence image processing with manual leucocyte differential to score immune cell infiltration in a mouse infection model of cystic fibrosis\",\"authors\":\"Madeline G. Williams, Zachary J. Faber, Thomas J. Kelley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Immune cell differentials are most commonly performed manually or with the use of automated cell sorting devices. However, manual review by research personnel can be both subjective and time consuming, and cell sorting approaches consume samples and demand additional reagents to perform the differential. We have created an artificial intelligence (AI) image processing pipeline using the Biodock.ai platform to classify immune cell types from Giemsa-stained cytospins of mouse bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Through multiple rounds of training and refinement, we have created a tool that is as accurate as manual review of slide images while removing the subjectivity and making the process mostly hands off, saving researcher time for other tasks and improving core turnaround for experiments.</div><div>This AI-based image processing is directly compatible with current workflows utilizing stained slides, in contrast to a change to a flow cytometry-based approach, which requires both specialized equipment, reagents, and expertise.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of artificial intelligence image processing with manual leucocyte differential to score immune cell infiltration in a mouse infection model of cystic fibrosis
Immune cell differentials are most commonly performed manually or with the use of automated cell sorting devices. However, manual review by research personnel can be both subjective and time consuming, and cell sorting approaches consume samples and demand additional reagents to perform the differential. We have created an artificial intelligence (AI) image processing pipeline using the Biodock.ai platform to classify immune cell types from Giemsa-stained cytospins of mouse bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Through multiple rounds of training and refinement, we have created a tool that is as accurate as manual review of slide images while removing the subjectivity and making the process mostly hands off, saving researcher time for other tasks and improving core turnaround for experiments.
This AI-based image processing is directly compatible with current workflows utilizing stained slides, in contrast to a change to a flow cytometry-based approach, which requires both specialized equipment, reagents, and expertise.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.