{"title":"从心脏移植方案中去除巨细胞病毒静脉注射免疫球蛋白的十二个月临床和成本结果","authors":"Madhumita Rao, Robert L. Page II, Emily Sartain","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection in solid organ transplant patients. Intravenous CMV immunoglobulin (CMV-IVIG) is a pharmacotherapy option with limited data within heart transplantation. At UCHealth, CMV-IVIG was removed from the heart transplant CMV prophylaxis protocol in July 2022. This study evaluated the efficacy and cost outcomes of CMV-IVIG removal from the protocol.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of heart transplant recipients transplanted at UCHealth between October 2020 and March 2023. Patients were included if seronegative for CMV, and excluded if they died or were lost to follow-up within 12 months of transplantation. Patients included were compared after being separated into pre- and post-protocol cohorts if transplanted prior to July 1, 2022 when CMV-IVIG was removed from the protocol and afterward, respectively. Standard universal prophylaxis with valganciclovir was used in both cohorts. The primary outcome was CMV DNAemia within 12 months of heart transplant, and secondary outcomes included cost avoidance and CMV DNAemia within 18 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-two patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in CMV DNAemia between pre- and post-protocol groups at 12 months (9.5% vs. 4.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.55) or 18 months (28.6% vs. 19%, <i>p</i> = 0.53). Median cost avoidance for removing CMV-IVIG from the protocol per patient was $30 652.13–$40 331.75.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Removing CMV-IVIG from a heart transplant protocol was associated with cost avoidance without worsened outcomes in CMV DNAemia. CMV-IVIG likely does not have significant benefits for preventing CMV DNAemia with concomitant universal antiviral prophylaxis in heart transplant recipients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twelve-Month Clinical and Cost Outcomes of Removal of Cytomegalovirus Intravenous Immune Globulin From Heart Transplantation Protocol\",\"authors\":\"Madhumita Rao, Robert L. Page II, Emily Sartain\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection in solid organ transplant patients. Intravenous CMV immunoglobulin (CMV-IVIG) is a pharmacotherapy option with limited data within heart transplantation. At UCHealth, CMV-IVIG was removed from the heart transplant CMV prophylaxis protocol in July 2022. This study evaluated the efficacy and cost outcomes of CMV-IVIG removal from the protocol.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of heart transplant recipients transplanted at UCHealth between October 2020 and March 2023. Patients were included if seronegative for CMV, and excluded if they died or were lost to follow-up within 12 months of transplantation. Patients included were compared after being separated into pre- and post-protocol cohorts if transplanted prior to July 1, 2022 when CMV-IVIG was removed from the protocol and afterward, respectively. Standard universal prophylaxis with valganciclovir was used in both cohorts. The primary outcome was CMV DNAemia within 12 months of heart transplant, and secondary outcomes included cost avoidance and CMV DNAemia within 18 months.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-two patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in CMV DNAemia between pre- and post-protocol groups at 12 months (9.5% vs. 4.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.55) or 18 months (28.6% vs. 19%, <i>p</i> = 0.53). Median cost avoidance for removing CMV-IVIG from the protocol per patient was $30 652.13–$40 331.75.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Removing CMV-IVIG from a heart transplant protocol was associated with cost avoidance without worsened outcomes in CMV DNAemia. CMV-IVIG likely does not have significant benefits for preventing CMV DNAemia with concomitant universal antiviral prophylaxis in heart transplant recipients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70147\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Twelve-Month Clinical and Cost Outcomes of Removal of Cytomegalovirus Intravenous Immune Globulin From Heart Transplantation Protocol
Introduction
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection in solid organ transplant patients. Intravenous CMV immunoglobulin (CMV-IVIG) is a pharmacotherapy option with limited data within heart transplantation. At UCHealth, CMV-IVIG was removed from the heart transplant CMV prophylaxis protocol in July 2022. This study evaluated the efficacy and cost outcomes of CMV-IVIG removal from the protocol.
Methods
This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of heart transplant recipients transplanted at UCHealth between October 2020 and March 2023. Patients were included if seronegative for CMV, and excluded if they died or were lost to follow-up within 12 months of transplantation. Patients included were compared after being separated into pre- and post-protocol cohorts if transplanted prior to July 1, 2022 when CMV-IVIG was removed from the protocol and afterward, respectively. Standard universal prophylaxis with valganciclovir was used in both cohorts. The primary outcome was CMV DNAemia within 12 months of heart transplant, and secondary outcomes included cost avoidance and CMV DNAemia within 18 months.
Results
Forty-two patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in CMV DNAemia between pre- and post-protocol groups at 12 months (9.5% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.55) or 18 months (28.6% vs. 19%, p = 0.53). Median cost avoidance for removing CMV-IVIG from the protocol per patient was $30 652.13–$40 331.75.
Conclusion
Removing CMV-IVIG from a heart transplant protocol was associated with cost avoidance without worsened outcomes in CMV DNAemia. CMV-IVIG likely does not have significant benefits for preventing CMV DNAemia with concomitant universal antiviral prophylaxis in heart transplant recipients.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.