胰岛素错误和影响医院糖尿病患者的因素:范围综述

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Christina Lange Ferreira , Angus Forbes , Rahab Hashim , Kirsty Winkley
{"title":"胰岛素错误和影响医院糖尿病患者的因素:范围综述","authors":"Christina Lange Ferreira ,&nbsp;Angus Forbes ,&nbsp;Rahab Hashim ,&nbsp;Kirsty Winkley","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Whilst insulin therapy errors are commonly reported in hospital and can cause significant negative outcomes for people with diabetes, there is no standardised approach to identifying when and why these errors occur within complex inpatient settings.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review was conducted to explore and map the types and classification of reported insulin errors in the care of people with diabetes in hospital inpatient settings and to identify potential interacting components/factors associated with these errors.</div></div><div><h3>Research design and methods</h3><div>The review followed the methodological approach of the Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished literature (grey) in the English language were searched from January 2000 to July 2024 on Medline, CINAHL, Embase and other relevant websites. Eligible studies were those reporting insulin errors occurring in hospital during the treatment of people who had diabetes. A new framework was developed for examining insulin errors (RESILIENT - interacting-components-in-insulin-use-in-hospital). This was applied to categorise incidents and interacting components identified. Results were summarised graphically and descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 124 peer-reviewed publications and reports were included. Only forty-nine studies attempted to classify the type of errors reported and they varied considerably in terminology and focus. Insulin errors were most frequently reported at the prescribing, administration, communication/documentation and medication review stages. Common factors associated with reported insulin errors included: time-critical coordination of insulin related tasks (for example coordination of glucose monitoring, meal delivery and mealtime insulin administration; prescribing and medication review; intravenous insulin infusion management); capability at point of care, staff knowledge, non-adherence to guidelines/recommendations; teamwork, communication gaps or errors; patient factors; organisational processes/systems, education and training; equipment (e.g. lack off system integration, right equipment at point of care).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The review highlighted considerable heterogeneity in approaches to identifying and classifying insulin errors in the literature. This review identified incidents occurring in areas of the insulin process which have been previously rarely explored. Further studies are needed, using standardised approaches which capture the complexity of insulin errors within the hospital system, to support the development of interventions which improve insulin safety. Use of RESILIENT Framework could offer a more standardised method of data collection and analysis of insulin errors.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>The protocol was registered at the Centre for Open Science (<span><span>https://osf.io/nmd8a</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Social media abstract</h3><div>A novel approach to identifying, classifying &amp; exploring insulin errors for people with diabetes in hospital @_ChristinaLange</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 105074"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insulin errors and contributing factors affecting people with diabetes in hospital: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Christina Lange Ferreira ,&nbsp;Angus Forbes ,&nbsp;Rahab Hashim ,&nbsp;Kirsty Winkley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Whilst insulin therapy errors are commonly reported in hospital and can cause significant negative outcomes for people with diabetes, there is no standardised approach to identifying when and why these errors occur within complex inpatient settings.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review was conducted to explore and map the types and classification of reported insulin errors in the care of people with diabetes in hospital inpatient settings and to identify potential interacting components/factors associated with these errors.</div></div><div><h3>Research design and methods</h3><div>The review followed the methodological approach of the Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished literature (grey) in the English language were searched from January 2000 to July 2024 on Medline, CINAHL, Embase and other relevant websites. Eligible studies were those reporting insulin errors occurring in hospital during the treatment of people who had diabetes. A new framework was developed for examining insulin errors (RESILIENT - interacting-components-in-insulin-use-in-hospital). This was applied to categorise incidents and interacting components identified. Results were summarised graphically and descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 124 peer-reviewed publications and reports were included. Only forty-nine studies attempted to classify the type of errors reported and they varied considerably in terminology and focus. Insulin errors were most frequently reported at the prescribing, administration, communication/documentation and medication review stages. Common factors associated with reported insulin errors included: time-critical coordination of insulin related tasks (for example coordination of glucose monitoring, meal delivery and mealtime insulin administration; prescribing and medication review; intravenous insulin infusion management); capability at point of care, staff knowledge, non-adherence to guidelines/recommendations; teamwork, communication gaps or errors; patient factors; organisational processes/systems, education and training; equipment (e.g. lack off system integration, right equipment at point of care).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The review highlighted considerable heterogeneity in approaches to identifying and classifying insulin errors in the literature. This review identified incidents occurring in areas of the insulin process which have been previously rarely explored. Further studies are needed, using standardised approaches which capture the complexity of insulin errors within the hospital system, to support the development of interventions which improve insulin safety. Use of RESILIENT Framework could offer a more standardised method of data collection and analysis of insulin errors.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>The protocol was registered at the Centre for Open Science (<span><span>https://osf.io/nmd8a</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Social media abstract</h3><div>A novel approach to identifying, classifying &amp; exploring insulin errors for people with diabetes in hospital @_ChristinaLange</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748925000835\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748925000835","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然胰岛素治疗错误在医院中经常被报道,并可能对糖尿病患者造成显著的负面结果,但没有标准化的方法来确定这些错误何时以及为什么会在复杂的住院环境中发生。目的:本综述旨在探讨糖尿病患者住院治疗中胰岛素错误的类型和分类,并确定与这些错误相关的潜在相互作用成分/因素。研究设计和方法本综述采用了乔安娜布里格斯研究所的范围评估方法。检索Medline、CINAHL、Embase等相关网站2000年1月至2024年7月已发表和未发表的英文文献(灰色)。符合条件的研究是那些报告糖尿病患者在医院治疗期间发生胰岛素错误的研究。一个新的框架被开发用于检查胰岛素错误(弹性-相互作用-成分-胰岛素-胰岛素-在医院使用)。这被应用于对事件和确定的交互组件进行分类。结果以图形和描述方式总结。结果共纳入124篇经同行评议的出版物和报告。只有49项研究试图对报告的错误类型进行分类,这些研究在术语和重点上差异很大。胰岛素错误最常发生在处方、给药、沟通/文件和药物审查阶段。与报告的胰岛素错误相关的常见因素包括:胰岛素相关任务的时间关键协调(例如葡萄糖监测、送餐和餐时胰岛素给药的协调);处方和药物审查;静脉注射胰岛素管理);护理点的能力,员工的知识,不遵守指南/建议;团队合作,沟通差距或错误;患者因素;组织流程/系统、教育和培训;设备(例如缺少系统集成,在护理点缺少正确的设备)。结论:本综述强调了文献中胰岛素错误识别和分类方法的相当大的异质性。本综述确定了发生在胰岛素过程领域的事件,这些事件以前很少被探索。需要进一步的研究,使用标准化的方法来捕捉医院系统内胰岛素错误的复杂性,以支持改善胰岛素安全性的干预措施的发展。弹性框架的使用可以提供一种更标准化的数据收集和胰岛素错误分析方法。该协议已在开放科学中心(https://osf.io/nmd8a)注册。社交媒体[摘要]一种新的识别、分类方法探索医院糖尿病患者的胰岛素错误@_ChristinaLange
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insulin errors and contributing factors affecting people with diabetes in hospital: A scoping review

Background

Whilst insulin therapy errors are commonly reported in hospital and can cause significant negative outcomes for people with diabetes, there is no standardised approach to identifying when and why these errors occur within complex inpatient settings.

Objective

This scoping review was conducted to explore and map the types and classification of reported insulin errors in the care of people with diabetes in hospital inpatient settings and to identify potential interacting components/factors associated with these errors.

Research design and methods

The review followed the methodological approach of the Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished literature (grey) in the English language were searched from January 2000 to July 2024 on Medline, CINAHL, Embase and other relevant websites. Eligible studies were those reporting insulin errors occurring in hospital during the treatment of people who had diabetes. A new framework was developed for examining insulin errors (RESILIENT - interacting-components-in-insulin-use-in-hospital). This was applied to categorise incidents and interacting components identified. Results were summarised graphically and descriptively.

Results

A total of 124 peer-reviewed publications and reports were included. Only forty-nine studies attempted to classify the type of errors reported and they varied considerably in terminology and focus. Insulin errors were most frequently reported at the prescribing, administration, communication/documentation and medication review stages. Common factors associated with reported insulin errors included: time-critical coordination of insulin related tasks (for example coordination of glucose monitoring, meal delivery and mealtime insulin administration; prescribing and medication review; intravenous insulin infusion management); capability at point of care, staff knowledge, non-adherence to guidelines/recommendations; teamwork, communication gaps or errors; patient factors; organisational processes/systems, education and training; equipment (e.g. lack off system integration, right equipment at point of care).

Conclusions

The review highlighted considerable heterogeneity in approaches to identifying and classifying insulin errors in the literature. This review identified incidents occurring in areas of the insulin process which have been previously rarely explored. Further studies are needed, using standardised approaches which capture the complexity of insulin errors within the hospital system, to support the development of interventions which improve insulin safety. Use of RESILIENT Framework could offer a more standardised method of data collection and analysis of insulin errors.

Registration

The protocol was registered at the Centre for Open Science (https://osf.io/nmd8a).

Social media abstract

A novel approach to identifying, classifying & exploring insulin errors for people with diabetes in hospital @_ChristinaLange
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信