基于排队和博弈论的基于维护策略和有限资源分配的基于绩效的合同价格谈判

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Canek Jackson , Rodrigo Pascual , Fredy Kristjanpoller
{"title":"基于排队和博弈论的基于维护策略和有限资源分配的基于绩效的合同价格谈判","authors":"Canek Jackson ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Pascual ,&nbsp;Fredy Kristjanpoller","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Servitization has become an important source of improvement in competitiveness and profitability in manufacturing industries providing capital-intensive engineering assets. In recent years, bundled offers of products and services have been referred to as product-service systems (PSS). The customers adopting this approach in their operations are more concerned about the system outcome (e.g. availability) rather than acquiring low-priced isolated assets. To align contractor policies with customer goals, the parties negotiate a performance-based contract (PBC), as an alternative to traditional maintenance contracts from after-sales of purchased engineering assets. Several previous works have described the benefits and challenges of these approaches. However, the models that deal with the problem of optimizing maintenance policies while determining the best price structure that satisfies both parties during asset servitization, are still pending. We formulate a novel framework for manufacturers providing a fleet of engineering assets jointly with preventive maintenance services. A profit-centric approach is proposed to determine the contract price structure using bargaining game formulation to satisfy parties’ expectations, while the operating firm decides on the optimal maintenance interval. Variations on the manufacturer’s resource allocation, and other model parameters, are studied through sensitivity analysis to assess their impact on production economics for both parties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 109596"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance-based contract price negotiation with maintenance policies and limited resource allocation based on queueing and game theory\",\"authors\":\"Canek Jackson ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Pascual ,&nbsp;Fredy Kristjanpoller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Servitization has become an important source of improvement in competitiveness and profitability in manufacturing industries providing capital-intensive engineering assets. In recent years, bundled offers of products and services have been referred to as product-service systems (PSS). The customers adopting this approach in their operations are more concerned about the system outcome (e.g. availability) rather than acquiring low-priced isolated assets. To align contractor policies with customer goals, the parties negotiate a performance-based contract (PBC), as an alternative to traditional maintenance contracts from after-sales of purchased engineering assets. Several previous works have described the benefits and challenges of these approaches. However, the models that deal with the problem of optimizing maintenance policies while determining the best price structure that satisfies both parties during asset servitization, are still pending. We formulate a novel framework for manufacturers providing a fleet of engineering assets jointly with preventive maintenance services. A profit-centric approach is proposed to determine the contract price structure using bargaining game formulation to satisfy parties’ expectations, while the operating firm decides on the optimal maintenance interval. Variations on the manufacturer’s resource allocation, and other model parameters, are studied through sensitivity analysis to assess their impact on production economics for both parties.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"volume\":\"285 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325000817\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325000817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

服务化已成为提供资本密集型工程资产的制造业提高竞争力和盈利能力的重要来源。近年来,产品和服务的捆绑提供被称为产品服务系统(PSS)。在他们的操作中采用这种方法的客户更关心系统的结果(例如可用性),而不是获得低价格的孤立资产。为了使承包商的政策与客户的目标保持一致,双方协商了一份基于绩效的合同(PBC),作为购买工程资产售后服务的传统维护合同的替代方案。以前的一些工作已经描述了这些方法的好处和挑战。然而,在资产服务化过程中,处理优化维护策略问题的模型仍然悬而未决,同时确定满足双方的最佳价格结构。我们为制造商制定了一个新的框架,为他们提供一系列工程资产和预防性维护服务。提出了一种以利润为中心的方法,利用讨价还价博弈公式来确定合同价格结构,以满足双方的期望,而运营企业决定最优维护间隔。通过敏感性分析研究制造商资源配置和其他模型参数的变化,以评估它们对双方生产经济学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance-based contract price negotiation with maintenance policies and limited resource allocation based on queueing and game theory
Servitization has become an important source of improvement in competitiveness and profitability in manufacturing industries providing capital-intensive engineering assets. In recent years, bundled offers of products and services have been referred to as product-service systems (PSS). The customers adopting this approach in their operations are more concerned about the system outcome (e.g. availability) rather than acquiring low-priced isolated assets. To align contractor policies with customer goals, the parties negotiate a performance-based contract (PBC), as an alternative to traditional maintenance contracts from after-sales of purchased engineering assets. Several previous works have described the benefits and challenges of these approaches. However, the models that deal with the problem of optimizing maintenance policies while determining the best price structure that satisfies both parties during asset servitization, are still pending. We formulate a novel framework for manufacturers providing a fleet of engineering assets jointly with preventive maintenance services. A profit-centric approach is proposed to determine the contract price structure using bargaining game formulation to satisfy parties’ expectations, while the operating firm decides on the optimal maintenance interval. Variations on the manufacturer’s resource allocation, and other model parameters, are studied through sensitivity analysis to assess their impact on production economics for both parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信