关于自然循环回路的不稳定性和稳定技术的见解

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
P.K. Vijayan , Swati Gangwar , Dev Banitia , U.C. Arunachala , S. Nakul , D.N. Elton , K. Varun
{"title":"关于自然循环回路的不稳定性和稳定技术的见解","authors":"P.K. Vijayan ,&nbsp;Swati Gangwar ,&nbsp;Dev Banitia ,&nbsp;U.C. Arunachala ,&nbsp;S. Nakul ,&nbsp;D.N. Elton ,&nbsp;K. Varun","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a generally held belief that the insertion of an orifice which is equivalent to increasing the L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio is always stabilizing SPNCSs. In this paper, it has been shown that the insertion of an orifice can stabilize or destabilize depending on whether the loop is operating near the lower or upper threshold of instability for single-phase loops. Besides, increasing the L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio increases the unstable zone in single-phase loops and, hence, is destabilizing. For two-phase loops, insertion of an orifice or increasing the L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio significantly shrinks the stable zone increasing the unstable zone as in single-phase loops. Thus for both single-phase and two-phase loops, reducing the L<sub>t</sub>/D is stabilizing. Contrary to this, for the supercritical loops L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio (or orificing) has a complex effect on instability. For example, increasing the L<sub>t</sub>/D or insertion of an orifice shrinks the unstable zone giving a stabilizing effect. Also, reducing the L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio is seen to shift both the lower and upper thresholds to higher powers and, in this sense, is stabilizing. However, it is also found to widen the unstable zone with a decrease in L<sub>t</sub>/D and, in this sense, is destabilizing.</div><div>The paper also reviews the available stabilizing techniques to identify the techniques which do not significantly reduce the heat transport capability while stabilizing. For single-phase and two-phase loops, the best way to stabilize is the reduction of L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio as it stabilizes with enhancement in heat transport capability. Introduction of an orifice enhances the unstable zone in single-phase and two-phase loops whereas it has a mixed effect in supercritical loops. Increase in L<sub>t</sub>/D is found to reduce the flow and hence narrows down the pseudocritical region and hence the unstable region to stabilize supercritical loops. Reduction of L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio is found to stabilize supercritical loops at high inlet temperatures, whereas it widens the unstable region at low inlet temperatures, which is attributed to the widening of the pseudocritical region. The paper also examines the various requirements for maximizing the power of natural circulation based reactors. Apart from reducing the frictional force, enhancing the surface area density in the core has a significant influence on enhancing the reactor power and various options for the same has been identified in the paper.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"438 ","pages":"Article 114017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights on the instability and stabilizing techniques for natural circulation loops\",\"authors\":\"P.K. Vijayan ,&nbsp;Swati Gangwar ,&nbsp;Dev Banitia ,&nbsp;U.C. Arunachala ,&nbsp;S. Nakul ,&nbsp;D.N. Elton ,&nbsp;K. Varun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is a generally held belief that the insertion of an orifice which is equivalent to increasing the L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio is always stabilizing SPNCSs. In this paper, it has been shown that the insertion of an orifice can stabilize or destabilize depending on whether the loop is operating near the lower or upper threshold of instability for single-phase loops. Besides, increasing the L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio increases the unstable zone in single-phase loops and, hence, is destabilizing. For two-phase loops, insertion of an orifice or increasing the L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio significantly shrinks the stable zone increasing the unstable zone as in single-phase loops. Thus for both single-phase and two-phase loops, reducing the L<sub>t</sub>/D is stabilizing. Contrary to this, for the supercritical loops L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio (or orificing) has a complex effect on instability. For example, increasing the L<sub>t</sub>/D or insertion of an orifice shrinks the unstable zone giving a stabilizing effect. Also, reducing the L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio is seen to shift both the lower and upper thresholds to higher powers and, in this sense, is stabilizing. However, it is also found to widen the unstable zone with a decrease in L<sub>t</sub>/D and, in this sense, is destabilizing.</div><div>The paper also reviews the available stabilizing techniques to identify the techniques which do not significantly reduce the heat transport capability while stabilizing. For single-phase and two-phase loops, the best way to stabilize is the reduction of L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio as it stabilizes with enhancement in heat transport capability. Introduction of an orifice enhances the unstable zone in single-phase and two-phase loops whereas it has a mixed effect in supercritical loops. Increase in L<sub>t</sub>/D is found to reduce the flow and hence narrows down the pseudocritical region and hence the unstable region to stabilize supercritical loops. Reduction of L<sub>t</sub>/D ratio is found to stabilize supercritical loops at high inlet temperatures, whereas it widens the unstable region at low inlet temperatures, which is attributed to the widening of the pseudocritical region. The paper also examines the various requirements for maximizing the power of natural circulation based reactors. Apart from reducing the frictional force, enhancing the surface area density in the core has a significant influence on enhancing the reactor power and various options for the same has been identified in the paper.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Design\",\"volume\":\"438 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325001943\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325001943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为,插入相当于增加Lt/D比的孔口总是稳定spncs。在本文中,已经证明了孔板的插入可以稳定或不稳定取决于回路是否运行在单相回路的不稳定的下限或上限附近。此外,增加Lt/D比会增加单相回路中的不稳定区域,从而导致不稳定。对于两相回路,插入孔板或增加Lt/D比会显著缩小稳定区,增加不稳定区,与单相回路一样。因此,对于单相和两相回路,降低Lt/D是稳定的。与此相反,对于超临界回路,Lt/D比(或孔口)对不稳定性有复杂的影响。例如,增加Lt/D或插入孔板可以缩小不稳定区域,从而达到稳定效果。此外,降低Lt/D比率被视为将较低和较高的阈值转移到更高的功率,从这个意义上说,是稳定的。然而,也发现随着Lt/D的减小,不稳定区变宽,从这个意义上说,是不稳定的。本文还回顾了现有的稳定技术,以确定在稳定时不会显著降低传热能力的技术。对于单相和两相回路,最好的稳定方法是降低Lt/D比,因为它随着热传递能力的增强而稳定。孔板的引入在单相和两相回路中增强了不稳定区,而在超临界回路中则有混合效应。Lt/D的增加减少了流量,从而缩小了伪临界区域,从而缩小了不稳定区域,从而稳定了超临界回路。Lt/D比的降低在高进口温度下稳定了超临界回路,而在低进口温度下,它扩大了不稳定区域,这是由于伪临界区域的扩大。本文还探讨了自然循环反应器功率最大化的各种要求。除了减小摩擦力外,提高堆芯的表面积密度对提高反应堆功率也有重要影响,本文已经确定了各种方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights on the instability and stabilizing techniques for natural circulation loops
There is a generally held belief that the insertion of an orifice which is equivalent to increasing the Lt/D ratio is always stabilizing SPNCSs. In this paper, it has been shown that the insertion of an orifice can stabilize or destabilize depending on whether the loop is operating near the lower or upper threshold of instability for single-phase loops. Besides, increasing the Lt/D ratio increases the unstable zone in single-phase loops and, hence, is destabilizing. For two-phase loops, insertion of an orifice or increasing the Lt/D ratio significantly shrinks the stable zone increasing the unstable zone as in single-phase loops. Thus for both single-phase and two-phase loops, reducing the Lt/D is stabilizing. Contrary to this, for the supercritical loops Lt/D ratio (or orificing) has a complex effect on instability. For example, increasing the Lt/D or insertion of an orifice shrinks the unstable zone giving a stabilizing effect. Also, reducing the Lt/D ratio is seen to shift both the lower and upper thresholds to higher powers and, in this sense, is stabilizing. However, it is also found to widen the unstable zone with a decrease in Lt/D and, in this sense, is destabilizing.
The paper also reviews the available stabilizing techniques to identify the techniques which do not significantly reduce the heat transport capability while stabilizing. For single-phase and two-phase loops, the best way to stabilize is the reduction of Lt/D ratio as it stabilizes with enhancement in heat transport capability. Introduction of an orifice enhances the unstable zone in single-phase and two-phase loops whereas it has a mixed effect in supercritical loops. Increase in Lt/D is found to reduce the flow and hence narrows down the pseudocritical region and hence the unstable region to stabilize supercritical loops. Reduction of Lt/D ratio is found to stabilize supercritical loops at high inlet temperatures, whereas it widens the unstable region at low inlet temperatures, which is attributed to the widening of the pseudocritical region. The paper also examines the various requirements for maximizing the power of natural circulation based reactors. Apart from reducing the frictional force, enhancing the surface area density in the core has a significant influence on enhancing the reactor power and various options for the same has been identified in the paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信