在资源有限的环境中实施 CRRT 补偿计划的经验教训

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Prit Kusirisin , Sadudee Peerapornratana , Jiratorn Sutawong , Yot Teerawattananon , Nattachai Srisawat
{"title":"在资源有限的环境中实施 CRRT 补偿计划的经验教训","authors":"Prit Kusirisin ,&nbsp;Sadudee Peerapornratana ,&nbsp;Jiratorn Sutawong ,&nbsp;Yot Teerawattananon ,&nbsp;Nattachai Srisawat","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acute kidney injury (AKI) poses significant risks, including high mortality and progression to chronic kidney disease. Effective treatment modalities include peritoneal dialysis (PD), intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). While each modality has specific advantages, CRRT is particularly vital for critically ill patients with severe AKI and contraindications for IHD. Despite its clinical benefits, the high cost of CRRT presents challenges, especially in resource-limited settings like Thailand.</div><div>This manuscript reviews the process of integrating CRRT into Thailand's Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS). Initial proposals in 2017 highlighted CRRT's importance, yet its high costs posed barriers to inclusion. A rigorous policy development process, emphasizing evidence-based and participatory decision-making, led to the proposal's acceptance in 2018. Key recommendations included optimizing reimbursement rates and increasing budget allocations.</div><div>By 2022, CRRT reimbursement was incorporated into the UCS, significantly improving access to treatment for patients with AKI. Specific outcomes from our 2-year policy implementation, including patient outcomes such as mortality, renal recovery, length of hospital stay, and complications, as well as cost-saving outcomes reflecting the need for intensive care resources, are ongoing. These cost-benefit analyses, along with policy adjustments, are necessary to ensure continued equitable and effective treatment. This case underscores the importance of aligning reimbursement strategies with clinical needs and financial realities to enhance both healthcare outcomes and system sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 155089"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lesson learnt from implementing a CRRT reimbursement program in a resource-limited setting\",\"authors\":\"Prit Kusirisin ,&nbsp;Sadudee Peerapornratana ,&nbsp;Jiratorn Sutawong ,&nbsp;Yot Teerawattananon ,&nbsp;Nattachai Srisawat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Acute kidney injury (AKI) poses significant risks, including high mortality and progression to chronic kidney disease. Effective treatment modalities include peritoneal dialysis (PD), intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). While each modality has specific advantages, CRRT is particularly vital for critically ill patients with severe AKI and contraindications for IHD. Despite its clinical benefits, the high cost of CRRT presents challenges, especially in resource-limited settings like Thailand.</div><div>This manuscript reviews the process of integrating CRRT into Thailand's Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS). Initial proposals in 2017 highlighted CRRT's importance, yet its high costs posed barriers to inclusion. A rigorous policy development process, emphasizing evidence-based and participatory decision-making, led to the proposal's acceptance in 2018. Key recommendations included optimizing reimbursement rates and increasing budget allocations.</div><div>By 2022, CRRT reimbursement was incorporated into the UCS, significantly improving access to treatment for patients with AKI. Specific outcomes from our 2-year policy implementation, including patient outcomes such as mortality, renal recovery, length of hospital stay, and complications, as well as cost-saving outcomes reflecting the need for intensive care resources, are ongoing. These cost-benefit analyses, along with policy adjustments, are necessary to ensure continued equitable and effective treatment. This case underscores the importance of aligning reimbursement strategies with clinical needs and financial realities to enhance both healthcare outcomes and system sustainability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 155089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125000760\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125000760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性肾损伤(AKI)具有显著的风险,包括高死亡率和进展为慢性肾脏疾病。有效的治疗方式包括腹膜透析(PD)、间歇血液透析(IHD)、持续低效率透析(SLED)和持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)。虽然每种方式都有其特定的优势,但CRRT对于患有严重AKI和IHD禁忌症的危重患者尤为重要。尽管有临床效益,但CRRT的高成本带来了挑战,特别是在泰国等资源有限的国家。本文回顾了将CRRT纳入泰国全民覆盖计划(UCS)的过程。2017年的初步提案强调了CRRT的重要性,但其高昂的成本对纳入构成了障碍。严格的政策制定过程强调循证和参与性决策,导致该提案于2018年获得通过。主要建议包括优化偿还率和增加预算拨款。到2022年,CRRT报销被纳入UCS,显著改善了AKI患者的治疗可及性。我们2年政策实施的具体结果,包括死亡率、肾脏恢复、住院时间和并发症等患者结果,以及反映重症监护资源需求的成本节约结果,正在进行中。这些成本效益分析以及政策调整对于确保持续的公平和有效治疗是必要的。这个案例强调了调整报销策略与临床需求和财务现实的重要性,以提高医疗保健结果和系统的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lesson learnt from implementing a CRRT reimbursement program in a resource-limited setting
Acute kidney injury (AKI) poses significant risks, including high mortality and progression to chronic kidney disease. Effective treatment modalities include peritoneal dialysis (PD), intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). While each modality has specific advantages, CRRT is particularly vital for critically ill patients with severe AKI and contraindications for IHD. Despite its clinical benefits, the high cost of CRRT presents challenges, especially in resource-limited settings like Thailand.
This manuscript reviews the process of integrating CRRT into Thailand's Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS). Initial proposals in 2017 highlighted CRRT's importance, yet its high costs posed barriers to inclusion. A rigorous policy development process, emphasizing evidence-based and participatory decision-making, led to the proposal's acceptance in 2018. Key recommendations included optimizing reimbursement rates and increasing budget allocations.
By 2022, CRRT reimbursement was incorporated into the UCS, significantly improving access to treatment for patients with AKI. Specific outcomes from our 2-year policy implementation, including patient outcomes such as mortality, renal recovery, length of hospital stay, and complications, as well as cost-saving outcomes reflecting the need for intensive care resources, are ongoing. These cost-benefit analyses, along with policy adjustments, are necessary to ensure continued equitable and effective treatment. This case underscores the importance of aligning reimbursement strategies with clinical needs and financial realities to enhance both healthcare outcomes and system sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信