{"title":"基于集成的不同土工格栅抗拔力自动预测方法","authors":"Vaishnavi Bherde , Samay Kumar Attara , Umashankar Balunaini","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Determination of the pullout resistance of geogrid, an essential parameter in MSE wall design, is time-consuming and expensive. The present study applies ensemble methods, namely, random forest, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and light gradient boosting to predict the pullout resistance factor (<em>F∗</em>) of geogrid. An extensive review resulting in a large pullout test dataset of 759 data points encompassing various influencing features such as normal stress, relative compaction, fines content, average particle size of fill material, embedment length, ultimate tensile strength, and longitudinal and transverse spacing of ribs of the geogrid, and pullout displacement rate is used to evaluate models. Results showed that the XGB (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.91 and RMSE = 0.18) outperformed the other ensemble approaches. Based on the feature importance analysis on the best-performing XGB model, normal stress, reinforcement embedment length, and relative compaction are found to be the most influencing parameters affecting <em>F∗</em>. A simplistic model to predict <em>F∗</em> as a function of only these three influencing parameters is proposed considering the ensemble model. Furthermore, limited laboratory pullout experiments are performed to evaluate these models. The proposed machine learning models fitted very well with the laboratory <em>F∗</em> values with an error within ±3 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 1035-1047"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ensemble-based approach for automatic prediction of pullout resistance of geogrids in different soil types\",\"authors\":\"Vaishnavi Bherde , Samay Kumar Attara , Umashankar Balunaini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Determination of the pullout resistance of geogrid, an essential parameter in MSE wall design, is time-consuming and expensive. The present study applies ensemble methods, namely, random forest, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and light gradient boosting to predict the pullout resistance factor (<em>F∗</em>) of geogrid. An extensive review resulting in a large pullout test dataset of 759 data points encompassing various influencing features such as normal stress, relative compaction, fines content, average particle size of fill material, embedment length, ultimate tensile strength, and longitudinal and transverse spacing of ribs of the geogrid, and pullout displacement rate is used to evaluate models. Results showed that the XGB (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.91 and RMSE = 0.18) outperformed the other ensemble approaches. Based on the feature importance analysis on the best-performing XGB model, normal stress, reinforcement embedment length, and relative compaction are found to be the most influencing parameters affecting <em>F∗</em>. A simplistic model to predict <em>F∗</em> as a function of only these three influencing parameters is proposed considering the ensemble model. Furthermore, limited laboratory pullout experiments are performed to evaluate these models. The proposed machine learning models fitted very well with the laboratory <em>F∗</em> values with an error within ±3 %.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1035-1047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000342\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000342","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ensemble-based approach for automatic prediction of pullout resistance of geogrids in different soil types
Determination of the pullout resistance of geogrid, an essential parameter in MSE wall design, is time-consuming and expensive. The present study applies ensemble methods, namely, random forest, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and light gradient boosting to predict the pullout resistance factor (F∗) of geogrid. An extensive review resulting in a large pullout test dataset of 759 data points encompassing various influencing features such as normal stress, relative compaction, fines content, average particle size of fill material, embedment length, ultimate tensile strength, and longitudinal and transverse spacing of ribs of the geogrid, and pullout displacement rate is used to evaluate models. Results showed that the XGB (R2 = 0.91 and RMSE = 0.18) outperformed the other ensemble approaches. Based on the feature importance analysis on the best-performing XGB model, normal stress, reinforcement embedment length, and relative compaction are found to be the most influencing parameters affecting F∗. A simplistic model to predict F∗ as a function of only these three influencing parameters is proposed considering the ensemble model. Furthermore, limited laboratory pullout experiments are performed to evaluate these models. The proposed machine learning models fitted very well with the laboratory F∗ values with an error within ±3 %.
期刊介绍:
The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.