重大胃肠外科手术后持续监测生命体征:患者、护士和医生的观点

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elize W. Lockhorst, Milicia van Noordenne, Linda Klouwens, Klaas M. Govaert, Eva de Bruijn, Paul D. Gobardhan, Jennifer M. J. Schreinemakers
{"title":"重大胃肠外科手术后持续监测生命体征:患者、护士和医生的观点","authors":"Elize W. Lockhorst,&nbsp;Milicia van Noordenne,&nbsp;Linda Klouwens,&nbsp;Klaas M. Govaert,&nbsp;Eva de Bruijn,&nbsp;Paul D. Gobardhan,&nbsp;Jennifer M. J. Schreinemakers","doi":"10.1111/jep.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing major abdominal surgical procedures are at risk of postoperative complications, requiring early recognition. Clinical deterioration is preceded by changes in vital sings, which are measured three times a day by a nurse. Due to the intermittent measuring, this may result in a delay in the recognition of clinical deterioration. Continuous vital sign monitoring through wireless sensors offers a potential solution for earlier recognition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate user satisfaction of a new wireless monitoring system measuring vital signs continuously, by both patients and healthcare providers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective, questionnaire-based study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>From December 2021 to November 2022, user experience questionnaires were administered to patients who underwent major abdominal surgical procedures and received the patch postoperatively. Questionnaires were administered as well to nurses and physicians working on a surgical ward with the patch. Continuous measurements of heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature were taken using the Sensium wireless patch.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 298 respondents completed the questionnaire, 191 patients, 88 nurses, and 19 physicians. Of the patients, 69% had a positive experience with the patch, and 74% felt safer. Sixty-three percent of the nurses were positive, and 65% had the feeling that they could monitor the patients better this way. Of the physicians, 63% were positive, 32% believed clinical deterioration could be identified earlier.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The use of the Sensium wireless patch for continuous monitoring of vital signs postoperatively was found to be feasible and well-tolerated. Patients, nurses, and physicians reported a positive experience with its use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70099","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring Vital Signs With Continuous Monitoring After Major Gastrointestinal Surgical Procedures: The Patient, Nurse and Physician Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Elize W. Lockhorst,&nbsp;Milicia van Noordenne,&nbsp;Linda Klouwens,&nbsp;Klaas M. Govaert,&nbsp;Eva de Bruijn,&nbsp;Paul D. Gobardhan,&nbsp;Jennifer M. J. Schreinemakers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients undergoing major abdominal surgical procedures are at risk of postoperative complications, requiring early recognition. Clinical deterioration is preceded by changes in vital sings, which are measured three times a day by a nurse. Due to the intermittent measuring, this may result in a delay in the recognition of clinical deterioration. Continuous vital sign monitoring through wireless sensors offers a potential solution for earlier recognition.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate user satisfaction of a new wireless monitoring system measuring vital signs continuously, by both patients and healthcare providers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A prospective, questionnaire-based study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>From December 2021 to November 2022, user experience questionnaires were administered to patients who underwent major abdominal surgical procedures and received the patch postoperatively. Questionnaires were administered as well to nurses and physicians working on a surgical ward with the patch. Continuous measurements of heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature were taken using the Sensium wireless patch.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 298 respondents completed the questionnaire, 191 patients, 88 nurses, and 19 physicians. Of the patients, 69% had a positive experience with the patch, and 74% felt safer. Sixty-three percent of the nurses were positive, and 65% had the feeling that they could monitor the patients better this way. Of the physicians, 63% were positive, 32% believed clinical deterioration could be identified earlier.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of the Sensium wireless patch for continuous monitoring of vital signs postoperatively was found to be feasible and well-tolerated. Patients, nurses, and physicians reported a positive experience with its use.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70099\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70099\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受重大腹部外科手术的患者存在术后并发症的风险,需要早期识别。临床恶化之前是生命体征的变化,由护士每天测量三次。由于测量是间歇性的,这可能会导致对临床恶化的识别延迟。通过无线传感器进行的连续生命体征监测为早期识别提供了潜在的解决方案。目的评估患者和医疗服务提供者对一种新型连续测量生命体征的无线监测系统的满意度。设计一项前瞻性、基于问卷的研究。方法于2021年12月至2022年11月,对接受腹部重大外科手术并术后使用贴片的患者进行用户体验问卷调查。调查问卷也发给了在外科病房工作的护士和医生。使用Sensium无线贴片连续测量心率、呼吸频率和体温。结果共收集问卷298份,其中患者191份,护士88份,医生19份。在患者中,69%的人对贴片有积极的体验,74%的人觉得更安全。63%的护士是积极的,65%的护士认为这样可以更好地监控病人。63%的医生持肯定态度,32%的医生认为可以更早地发现临床恶化。结论应用Sensium无线贴片进行术后生命体征持续监测是可行且耐受性良好的。患者、护士和医生报告了使用它的积极体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring Vital Signs With Continuous Monitoring After Major Gastrointestinal Surgical Procedures: The Patient, Nurse and Physician Perspective

Background

Patients undergoing major abdominal surgical procedures are at risk of postoperative complications, requiring early recognition. Clinical deterioration is preceded by changes in vital sings, which are measured three times a day by a nurse. Due to the intermittent measuring, this may result in a delay in the recognition of clinical deterioration. Continuous vital sign monitoring through wireless sensors offers a potential solution for earlier recognition.

Aim

To evaluate user satisfaction of a new wireless monitoring system measuring vital signs continuously, by both patients and healthcare providers.

Design

A prospective, questionnaire-based study.

Methods

From December 2021 to November 2022, user experience questionnaires were administered to patients who underwent major abdominal surgical procedures and received the patch postoperatively. Questionnaires were administered as well to nurses and physicians working on a surgical ward with the patch. Continuous measurements of heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature were taken using the Sensium wireless patch.

Results

A total of 298 respondents completed the questionnaire, 191 patients, 88 nurses, and 19 physicians. Of the patients, 69% had a positive experience with the patch, and 74% felt safer. Sixty-three percent of the nurses were positive, and 65% had the feeling that they could monitor the patients better this way. Of the physicians, 63% were positive, 32% believed clinical deterioration could be identified earlier.

Conclusion

The use of the Sensium wireless patch for continuous monitoring of vital signs postoperatively was found to be feasible and well-tolerated. Patients, nurses, and physicians reported a positive experience with its use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信